GOP Candidates Seek Distance From Bush
Republican Candidates In Tight Races Highlight Independence In Ads
-
Play CBS Video
Video
War Threatens GOP Control
Only On The Web: In the run-up to the November elections, the unpopularity of the Iraq war is threatening Republican control of Congress. Bill Plante reports.
-
Video
War Debate In Election Run-Up
As Congress returns to work, both parties are battling for control of Capitol Hill in the November elections. Bill Plante reports.
-
Video
The Run-Up To The Election
With the 2006 midterm elections coming up, Democrats plan to use the war in Iraq to regain control of Congress. Randall Pinkston has more details.
-
Photo
Rep. Deborah Pryce, R-Ohio, speaks in Clintonville, Ohio, Tuesday, April 18, 2006. In 2004, her campaign Web site featured a banner of her and Bush sitting together, smiling. But in her latest television ad, Pryce is described as "independent." (AP (file))
-
Interactive
Campaign 2006
Complete coverage and analysis of Senate and key House races, plus gubernatorial elections.
Consider Rep. Deborah Pryce, the fourth-ranking House Republican struggling to hold onto her seat in an evenly split district in central Ohio, near Columbus.
In 2004, her campaign Web site featured a banner of her and Bush sitting together, smiling. But in her latest television ad, Pryce is described as "independent." The spot also highlights how she "stood up to her own party" and the president to support increased federal funds for embryonic stem-cell research.
As chairwoman of the House Republican Conference, Pryce rallies colleagues to the party message.
With the election in about two months and Bush's approval ratings still low — 33 percent in the most recent Associated Press-Ipsos poll — Republicans involved in tight races are avoiding party labels and playing down their ties to the president. On issues from the Iraq war to Amtrak spending, GOP candidates are trying to argue that they don't follow in lockstep.
Among some of the ads:
In Pennsylvania, Republican Rep. Jim Gerlach tells voters: "When I believe President Bush is right, I'm behind him. But when I think he's wrong, I let him know that, too." Gerlach is in a close contest with Democrat Lois Murphy, who nearly beat him in 2004.
In Minnesota, where an open Senate seat is at stake, Republican Rep. Mark Kennedy has an ad titled, "Crossing Party Lines," in which he says: "I'm a Republican. On issues like taxes and spending, I vote like it. But on other issues, I cross party lines." In 2002, in his run for the House, a Kennedy ad showed him walking and shaking hands with Bush at the White House. Today, he lists the issues on which he has split from the president.
In South Florida, heavily populated by retirees, Republican Rep. Clay Shaw criticizes the president's stalled plans to change Social Security and says in his ad, "I represent the state of Florida, not a political party."
Ed Patru, a spokesman for the House Republican campaign committee, shrugged off the latest ads.
"That's nothing new, that's just being a smart campaigner," said Patru, who argued the candidates were reinforcing the moderate positions that have helped them win in swing districts.
Democrats, naturally, have a different view.
"What we're seeing is a number of candidates who embraced Bush in previous elections are now treating him like a leper," said Phil Singer, spokesman for the Senate Democratic campaign organization.
Shanto Iyengar, a campaign advertising expert at Stanford University, said the 1974 midterm elections, in the immediate aftermath of President Nixon's Watergate-driven resignation, were similar to today's advertising atmosphere.
"In most congressional races the conventional wisdom is it's all local," Iyengar said. "But every now and then, it is possible to nationalize these races, and I believe all the stars are in place for that in 2006."
New Mexico pollster Brian Sanderoff, who is closely watching the re-election campaign of Rep. Heather Wilson, a moderate Republican, said that as the president's approval ratings drop, "incumbents are becoming even more clear in expressing their independence or distance from the White House."
In Pennsylvania, Republican Sen. Rick Santorum, No. 3 in the GOP Senate leadership, has stood with the president on scores of issues, from abortion to same-sex marriage to taxes. Trailing his Democratic challenger Bob Casey in the polls, Santorum brags about breaking with the administration on Amtrak money.
"And the White House probably called me a lot of things when I fought their efforts to cut Amtrak funding," Santorum says.
Another vulnerable Senate incumbent, Ohio Republican Mike DeWine, has welcomed the president for two events that raised $2 million. Yet his ads have touted his independence and ability to work with Democrats.
In Missouri, Republican Sen. Jim Talent's first ad of 2006 said: "Most people don't care if you're red or blue, Republican or Democrat ... They care about getting things done."
Talent's opponent, Democrat Claire McCaskill, argues that Talent is trying to "reinvent himself" from 2002, when an ad showed Bush praising Talent.
©MMVI, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.



Time to get rid of these people, and find candidates with some balls, as well as brains.
Those values and honor America had were sadly, your grandfathers. And how to do respect that? You let yourselves be constantly reminded of the sacrifices of the Israelis and their struggle, but haplessly forget to mention or show equal respect for the greater sacrifices of your grandfathers, my grandfather included - to save them. Many multiples of Christian Allied Soldiers died saving persecuted Jews than actual Jewish victims, but do those that were saved now celebrate Remeberance Day like they do their Holocaust Day? No. Do they show respect to the sacrifices and courage of your fathers and grandfathers? No, and you dont mind either. You have done nothing to deserve what your grandfathers and forefathers built, yet you also dont protect it either. You are just their lazy, petulant, undereducated, overprivileged offspring callously throwing away all of your inherited freedom and prosperity as if you earned it.
You didnt. You hit the global genetic lotto by somehow being born in the USA and not some fly infested African village without running water, and now you need to pay back your forefathers and fight to keep what they died to keep for you.
But you won't. Its too 'inconvenient' for todays Americans and may offend too many people if you face the reality of the situation, and too much like hard work to get rid of these shameless thieves and liars you call a White House.
What a magical place it seemed.
What happened to you? What happened to the America we loved and admired? The land of the free and home of the brave. 50 yrs ago, your beloved JFK had to prove to the American public in a National Forum debate that the Vatican would not influence the White House foreign, social or domestic policy because he was a Catholic. That is how badly you wanted to protect your civil rights, and rightly so. Now your President runs on the premise of being 'sent by his faith and God'.......and the American public are too busy watching 'Surreal Life' to care about Real Life, and too ignorant to know or see the threat.
This latest Supreme Court Justice cronyism light on US ethics, or what is left of it, shows me the US is now for sale on every level and the human values and morality that made America once so great have Bush, Cheney, Rumsfeld and Rove working the checkout counters as fast as they can and you are doing nothing about it. Nothing. American heros? Save yourselves. Your enemy is within and the propoganda fear tactics blind you to that reality.
Your tax system, social security, military spending, racial, sexual and religious rights, homeland security, foreign policy, supreme court, free speach and electoral rules have all been sold, leased or stolen in the last 6 years and the American public does nothing about it. Pathetic. You look like fools. A sadly battered wife that makes excuses for brutality to stay, instead of facing the facts and making tough changes you know are needed to defend the sacrifices of your fathers. And no, it doesnt need a bullet or any killing of Muslims. The enemy you face is comically, your own fear and what it lets your 'leaders' get away with, like the obviously Islamophobic propoganda that curiously coicides with that inconsistent justification we now call 911. The $300 billion spent on the war could have funded a national education strategy or guarantee your social security, but fear made you give it all to Bechtel, Halliburton, Raytheon and Lockheed.
Your constitution is next, and they arent scared to show it either.
While your statement that "Many multiples of Christian Allied Soldiers died saving persecuted Jews than actual Jewish victims" seems to have been painted with a broad brush, your comments otherwise are fascinating. Despite all evidence to the contrary from this White House, the opinion of the world does matter.
We Americans have gotten lost in the chaos and hubris of the last six years. Thank you for putting an outsider's perspective on our experience. I wish every citizen could read what you wrote.
If there's a "clean sweep" in Nov., we need to write letters & emails to our Congressmen urging the impeachment of Bush. I'd like to see Cheney impeached even more than Bush. Would it be possible for impeachment charges to be brought against both of them @ the same time? Cheney has always been the real President; he is the mastermind behind nearly all of this adm. policies/actions.
I too want to say thank-you to johnhardy21 for his outsider's perspective. I'd also say to you that there are many thousands of Americans who never voted for Bush/Cheney. We've worked (& are working) to press our Congressmen to have both of them impeached.
We're not afraid of any of them & we're not afraid to speak out against them! So much of what we're trying to accomplish has been blunted by the Repub. dominated Senate/House. That's why it's so important to vote out the Repub. incumbents in Nov.; they're a "rubber stamp" for the policies of this adm.
I would urge johnhardy21 to read "The United States of Cheney". It's posted @ this CBS website under the Opinion section.
Also , look up the Project for the New American Century (PNAC) & The Caryle Group.
-
by houser123
September 5, 2006 12:47 PM PDT
- This brings new meaning to the catch phrases "Cut and Run", "defeatist" and that favorite one " Appease the Enemy".It is amazing to see how far some GOP candidates will go to distance themselves from this administration.
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 17 Comments