February 11, 2009 6:04 PM

Iran Defiant Ahead Of U.N. Deadline

(CBS/AP)  Iran's hardline president declared Saturday that his nation's controversial nuclear program poses no threat to any other country, even Israel "which is a definite enemy."

President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad spoke after inaugurating a heavy-water production plant, which went into operation despite U.N. demands that Iran roll back its nuclear program. Tehran says is for peaceful purposes, but Western countries fear it could eventually be used to develop a nuclear bomb.

During a speech, Ahmadinejad declared that Iran would never abandon its nuclear program and repeated that nuclear weapons is not the goal.

"Basically, there is no talk of nuclear weapons. There is no discussion of nuclear weapons," he said. "We are not a threat to anybody even the Zionist regime, which is a definite enemy for the people of the region."

Iran is under a Thursday deadline established by the U.N. Security Council to suspend uranium enrichment or face political and economic sanctions. Tehran has called the Security Council's resolution that set the deadline "illegal" and has insisted it won't give up its nuclear program.

"Iran's defiance of U.N. demands that it halt its nuclear program is particularly worrisome because of its involvement in the Middle East conflict," said CBS News Foreign Affairs Analyst Pamela Falk, "and divisions among the world powers about next steps makes the Security Council less able to send a united message to Tehran."

Iran also responded on Tuesday to an incentives package presented by the five permanent members of the Security Council plus Germany. Tehran said it would be open to negotiations but did not agree to the West's key demand for Tehran to halt uranium enrichment as a precondition to talks.

On Saturday, Ahmadinejad affirmed Iran's right to develop nuclear technology even if sanctions are imposed.

"They may impose some restrictions on us under pressure. But will they be able to prevent the thoughts of a nation? Will they be able to prevent the progress and technology to a nation? They have to accept the reality of a powerful, peace-loving and developed Iran. This is in the interest of all governments and all nations whether they like it or not," he said.

According to a Los Angeles Times report Saturday, Bush administration officials have indicated they are prepared to form an independent coalition to freeze Iranian assets and cut off trade to the Islamic nation if the U.N. Security Council declines to enact sanctions.

John Bolton, the U.S.'s ambassador to the United Nations, told the newspaper that Washington was focusing on banks in Europe and Japan to restrict business with Iran, because most of Tehran's transactions are done in U.S. dollars, British pounds and Japanese yen. "There aren't a lot of opportunities to sell in other currencies," Bolton said.

Though the West's main worry has been uranium enrichment, it also has called on Iran to stop the construction of a heavy-water reactor near the plant that Ahmadinejad inaugurated.

Iran has been a building the reactor for two years but is not scheduled to complete it until 2009.

Nuclear weapons can be produced using either plutonium or highly enriched uranium as the explosive core. Either substance can be produced in the process of running a reactor.

Reactors fueled by enriched uranium use regular — or "light" — water as a "moderator" in the chain reaction that produces energy. Reactors using "heavy water" contains a heavier hydrogen particle, which allow the reactor to run on natural uranium mined by Iran, forgoing the enrichment progress.

But the spent fuel from a heavy-water reactor can be reprocessed to extract plutonium for use in a bomb.

Vice President Gholamreza Aghazadeh, who also heads the Atomic Energy Organization of Iran, said the heavy-water plant's production is 16 tons of heavy water with a purity of 15 percent per year and 80 tons of heavy water with a purity of nearly 100 percent annually. He said the heavy-water facility will be used to treat AIDS and cancer and for other medicine and agricultural purposes.

Mohammed Saeedi, the deputy head of Iran's atomic organization, called the plant "one of the biggest nuclear projects" in the country, state-run television reported.

The Vienna, Austria-based International Atomic Energy Agency will report on the state of Iran's program by mid-September. If IAEA chief Mohamed ElBaradei's report finds that enrichment is continuing, the council is then likely to move toward sanctions.

© 2009 CBS Interactive Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.
  • Scott Conroy

    Scott Conroy is a National Political Reporter for RealClearPolitics and a contributor for CBS News.

Add a Comment
by heardenuff August 26, 2006 7:04 PM EDT
right tomflint69


except they are sure to place those sites in and or around residantial areas to shield themselves from just such an attack

or they will as has been show in the past relocate any mobile missle units to residential locations
Reply to this comment
by tomflint69 August 26, 2006 5:22 PM EDT
Dear, FARTNOCKER2 I am also against killings resulted from war, but the case is different in Iranian concern. A state that never tolerates the existence of other countries! A nation that writes on its missiles "crush US under feet" and similar violent language. See, in war where we achieve peace, we also have to pay for it. A few people would suggest that it would be better to only hit Iranian nuclear sites, preventing any threats we feel from its nuclear progress - without waging any full scale war.
Reply to this comment
by fartnocker2 August 26, 2006 3:54 PM EDT
Anyone really believe that the U>N>will really do anything ??? NO !! Will China and Russia back Iran ?? YES . Will nothing change )CORRECT
Would the American public ok a war with Iran )NO should they )YES while they don't have the Necular Bomb. Can any war be fought without civilians being killed or cities wiped off the map and win ?? 100% NO .How many times do we have to prove that . Israel just proved it also.So if you not ready to displace millions and kill hunders of thousands let not fight any more .
Reply to this comment
by ronniehm August 26, 2006 3:19 PM EDT
Well that's comical. A Democrat drops two nuclear bombs and somehow it's a Democratic talking point against Republicans.
Reply to this comment
by paul_pitcl August 26, 2006 2:57 PM EDT
Iran sits on a sea of oil and natural gas. They will not need nuclear power for another 50 years. Let's talk about Iran having nuclear power at that time.
Reply to this comment
by minutesaway August 26, 2006 1:35 PM EDT
We need to leave those people alone. If they want to develope nukes that's there business.
Besides no country has ever used nukes in a war.
Well, if you exclude hmmmm "the UNITED STATES".

They are just trying to protect themselves from
an overly agressive west.

Personally I think that everyone should give up nukes including hmmmm "the UNITED STATES"
Reply to this comment
by jag2ya August 26, 2006 1:34 PM EDT
I think we are ignoring the creator of 9/11 and that group's birth place. Recently we also heard where he is. If we continue to ignore them, they grow to an extent that can't be controlled. Then, who do we give the gift of the w*r to? By that time Iran becomes another Iraq...where are we going? Do we know? We went to Afghanistan that is the right place. Continue and find the lost there.
Reply to this comment
by tomflint69 August 26, 2006 12:22 PM EDT
Yeah, we will not put our restrictions on you like before this time. We'll put "new sanctions" plus a gift of w*r. Please don't over estimate us.
Reply to this comment
by tomflint69 August 26, 2006 12:06 PM EDT
I believe U.S is also willing Iran to pursue nuclear weapons. We fear more of cutting our oil as compared to Iran throwing nukes on us? is it justified? not at all.
Reply to this comment
.
Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
CBS News on Facebook