Don't Marry Career Women? Not So Fast!
Forbes Opinion Piece Roils Cyberspace
-
Photo
(CBS/AP)
-
Section
Blogophile
CBSNews.com's Melissa McNamara samples the best of the blogs.
-
Video
Digital Dan Dubno's Video Blog
The hottest, coolest, weirdest, smartest,(or dumbest) gadgets! Exclusive video blogs go behind the scenes of the greatest tech shows on earth.
What's a surefire way to attract attention to your story? Call it: "Don't Marry Career Women."
Forbes.com pulled down an article by its executive news editor about career women after it provoked a heated response from bloggers, and reposted the story with a "rebuttal" from a female reporter in their Silicon Valley bureau. The point-counterpoint has bloggers buzzing. "Forbes" is the second most popular search term on Technorati on Thursday, with over 194,000 links.
The article by Michael Noer contains reasons for men not to marry "career women." Noer relies primarily on dry sociological studies – not controversial in themselves and unlikely to spark online furor– but Noer's take on it is undoubtedly provocative. For example, his article begins:
"Guys: A word of advice. Marry pretty women or ugly ones. Short ones or tall ones. Blondes or brunettes. Just, whatever you do, don't marry a woman with a career.
"A recent study in Social Forces, a research journal, found that women–even those with a ‘feminist’ outlook–are happier when their husband is the primary breadwinner. Not a happy conclusion, especially given that many men, particularly successful men, are attracted to women with similar goals and aspirations. And why not? After all, your typical career girl is well-educated, ambitious, informed and engaged. All seemingly good things, right? Sure…at least until you get married. Then, to put it bluntly, the more successful she is the more likely she is to grow dissatisfied with you. Sound familiar?"
And if that sentiment weren't enough fodder for the blogosphere, the article originally appeared with a handy sidebar of "Nine Reasons To Steer Clear Of Career Women," illustrated with pictures of some sad-looking men. The sidebar no longer appears on the site but the blog Pandagon includes it here.
In her counterpoint, "Don't Marry A Lazy Man," Elizabeth Corcoran calls Noer's article "downright frightening."
"Studies aside, modern marriage is a two-way street," Corcoran writes. "Men should own up to their responsibilities, too."
Corcoran also points out that despite being a career woman, she and her husband are about to celebrate 18 years of a happy marriage. It's a point that resonates with many female bloggers who consider themselves career women and not surprisingly, took issue with Noer's piece.
"Articles like this are obviously insulting to women because they reinforce outdated and highly sexist notions of what a 'good woman' is, and they imply that if you don’t fit the Suzie Homemaker mold (which most stay-at-home moms don’t even fit) then your marriage prospects are shot," Jill at Feministe blogs. "And they reinforce the idea that marriage is the highest goal that women should seek."
"I'm still trapped in the house and perhaps going a little stir crazy, but I'm pretty damn sure it's still 2006," bitsandgiggles adds.
Other bloggers point out that Noer isn't one to shirk attention when writing about marriage. After all, he wrote an earlier piece about the economics of getting married versus hiring a prostitute. That article also contained references to several studies on "career women” and how they don't make for an ideal marriage.
Gawker notes that perhaps Noer has a few "issues with the institution of marriage."
But perhaps publicity was partly the intent of writing a potentially inflammatory piece?
"The latest rumor about the Forbes article by conveniently unreachable Michael Noer is that the piece was deliberately provocative. Not to inspire intelligent debate, mind you - but to drive traffic from the hip, highly-female blogger demographic to a publication to which they (I’m projecting here) would not ordinarily purchase a subscription," Jennifer writes at The New Charm School.
Readers on Forbes.com also weighed in. Some question what all the fuss is about. "I can't understand why women are getting so upset with this article. It is just examines statistical trends about social and economical aspects of gender equality," VegasMike writes. "The article is just informative to the reader. Men AND Women should have all the statistical knowledge facing the institution marriage today."
But Newbie disagrees. "Contrary to popular belief on this message board, a highly-educated, motivated, high-earning career woman can be 1/2 of a happy, well-functioning, productive marriage," Newbie writes. "Here's the winning formula - we support each other."
Sure many more people are reading Forbes.com today, but could it backfire? Perhaps. "It's incredibly disappointing to see them publish a piece that makes such gross generalizations about working women," Travelocity president and CEO Michelle Peluso, who has been featured in Forbes, told Salon.com. And she also said she planned to approach the magazine directly about the piece.
By Melissa McNamara ©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.



How many career women and baby factories have you been married to? The Forbes article was about marrying a career woman, not dating one. From your comment, I would hazard to guess that you have never been married. I would prefer to date intelligent, educated, ambitious, witty, charming career women. The question is whether that woman will be happy married to you.
Let's put a different spin on the discussion. It's not a matter of whether a man would be satisfied with a career woman. The real question is whether a career woman (a euphemism for intelligent, ambitious, successful) will be disappointed with the average loser that manhood has to offer in our society. The underlying message coming from Forbes is a warning that most men don't measure up and they are headed for trouble if they actually marry that tantalizing dream of a woman whose talents and virtues are manifested by outward career success.
Of course, some men can make the grade and the rebuttals by their wives are wonderful. The truth is that there are a lot more women with their acts together than there are comparable men to marry. It is proverbial to hear successful women lament "Where are all the good men?" The answer is that a large proportion of them never grew up and they don't exist in a par ratio to the women hoping to find them and live happily every after.
Everyone can save themselves a lot of heartache if they avoid being "unequally yoked together."
Perhaps he should write an article entitled "guys: don't marry, date, or sleep with women."
Granted it is scary to see the conservative agenda at work in the media which is promoting the stay at home little woman thing, but anyone with an education and a brain would know that it is a choice and not something women are subjugated to any longer. This article archaicly states the reason marriages fail is because the woman chooses to be a productive member of society as well as a wife and mother if she so chooses, and does not as usual give any responsibilty to the man in the relationship.
A little research into the facts he presented would probably have shown very different results. Oh the poor husband! Put upon to pick up the kid, shop at the store, or maybe even put on dinner, after a long day at work. Pal, those days are over and good riddence.
Buck up for gods sake and stop being threatened by your wifes success. If she makes more money than you, it really isn't emasculating.
I will have to say that the days that I was a stay at home Mom were a heck of a lot EASIER than working!!
It's a dirty little secret that moms who don't work want everyone to belive.
With the exception of raisng 5 to 10 kids than, god bless!!
However most American households have 1 to 3 children and it's not such a bad job to stay home!
So stop complianing at home Mom's trust me you have it easy compared to the Rat Race of the real world!!
A Career woman really does not need a Man that can't stand the heat of the kitchen!!
RH
RH
RH
RH
RH
RH
Oh, and ronny - it's "riddance", not "riddens"
I am a 24 year old female in law school who exemplifies everything Mr. Noer istrying to convey. I do not want to have kids (they are inconvenient and will ruin my party life); do not want to get married (why do so when there are so many guys to sleep around with); and will value my career more than anything else (what satisfaction do friends and family really bring?). Sadly, I am one of thousands of young women who feel this way. This is due to the bad ideas brought on by the feminist movement.
We are now living in a time when dogs/cats are replacing actual children. This is also a time in which there is an increase in the number of divorces occurring. In a few years, there will be more kids in America born of foreign parents than American parents. In addition, there is an increasing number of American men becoming more interested in foreign females.
Career women tend to be conniving, uncreative and unpleasant. I have found female bosses to be less pleasant than male bosses. The reason for that is that women in "power" feel that they have to prove themselves, therefore they tend to be overly aggressive.
It is ironic that despite this being a time in which freedom of speech is touted, the comments of one individual can spark so much uproar, leading to him having to recant his statements. The women who are upset are just too dishonest with themselves and others to admit that Noer may have a point.
- Elle
-
by elle_1
August 27, 2006 10:13 PM PDT
- WOMEN--GET REAL AND BE HONEST
-
Reply to this comment
-
See all 24 CommentsI am a 24 year old female in law school who exemplifies everything Mr. Noer istrying to convey. I do not want to have kids (they are inconvenient and will ruin my party life); do not want to get married (why do so when there are so many guys to sleep around with); and will value my career more than anything else (what satisfaction do friends and family really bring?). Sadly, I am one of thousands of young women who feel this way. This is due to the bad ideas brought on by the feminist movement.
We are now living in a time when dogs/cats are replacing actual children. This is also a time in which there is an increase in the number of divorces occurring. In a few years, there will be more kids in America born of foreign parents than American parents. In addition, there is an increasing number of American men becoming more interested in foreign females.
Career women tend to be conniving, uncreative and unpleasant. I have found female bosses to be less pleasant than male bosses. The reason for that is that women in "power" feel that they have to prove themselves, therefore they tend to be overly aggressive.
It is ironic that despite this being a time in which freedom of speech is touted, the comments of one individual can spark so much uproar, leading to him having to recant his statements. The women who are upset are just too dishonest with themselves and others to admit that Noer may have a point.
- Elle