AOL Ousts Technology Chief

3 Axed In Wake Of Search-Data Disclosure Controversy

(CBS/AP)  Three America Online employees, including AOL's chief technology officer, are workplace casualties of a recent search-data breach that infuriated some members.

Two employees were fired and its chief technology officer, Maureen Govern, has left the company following a privacy breach in which the Internet search terms of more than 650,000 subscribers were publicly released.

Govern will be replaced on an interim basis by John McKinley, who had held that position before becoming AOL's president for digital services. The change takes effect immediately, according to a memo AOL Chief Executive Jonathan Miller sent to employees on Monday.

AOL says the search-data disclosure was a mistake.

The researcher who released the data and that employee's direct supervisor were fired, said one person familiar with the company's decisions. The person, who spoke on condition of anonymity because release of personnel information was not authorized, would not say whether Govern's departure was voluntary.

Earlier in August, AOL released the Internet search terms that more than 650,000 of its subscribers entered over a three-month period and has admitted that what it originally intended as a gesture to researchers amounted to a privacy breach and a mistake.

Although AOL had substituted numeric IDs for the subscribers' real user names, the company acknowledged the search queries themselves may contain personally identifiable data.

For example, many users type their names to find out whether sites have dirt on them and then separately search for online mentions of their phone, credit card or Social Security numbers.

A few days later, they may search for pizzerias in their neighborhoods, revealing their locations, or for prescription drug prices, revealing their medical conditions. All those separate searches would be linked to the same numeric ID.

"Search query data can contain the sum total of our work, interests, associations, desires, dreams, fantasies and even darkest fears," said Lauren Weinstein, a privacy advocate.

The company apologized for the disclosure.

"This was a screw up, and we're angry and upset about it," AOL spokesman Andrew Weinstein said. "It was an innocent enough attempt to reach out to the academic community with new research tools, but it was obviously not appropriately vetted, and if it had been, it would have been stopped in an instant."

He could not say whether anyone has been disciplined, saying an internal investigation was continuing.

[ronniehm]

Why is AOL recording this information in the first place?

[verybadkitte]

I'm not at all convinced that the "screw up" was merely due to a "gesture" toward "researchers". Who are these researchers? People who want to know our blood-type in order to provide scientific breakthroughs or, marketing fullfillment agencies looking how to push-sell one million bottles of Viagra? The providing of marketing lists is a violation of public trust, however it's done all the time by the small, sharky businesses. It is viewed as a particularly dirty practice when carried out by a giant of the internet portals such as AOL. Hope others take the time to clarify their policy to their employees and don't wait for a "screw up"