Court's Ten Commandments Statue Stays
Federal Judge Rules Haskell County Did Not Violate Constitution
-
(AP)
-
Interactive The Ten Commandments Facts about the biblical laws, different versions and other ancient codes.
-
Interactive The Supreme Court History, traditions and key cases, plus what it takes to get on the bench.
-
Interactive Eye on Religion Find out more about the beliefs, practices and history of some of the world's major religions.
U.S. District Judge Ronald A. White in Muskogee ruled that Haskell County did not violate the Constitution by erecting the monument. The county did not "overstep the constitutional line demarcating government neutrality toward religion," he wrote.
The county argued that the monument outside the Stigler courthouse was part of a historical display that included other monuments recognizing war veterans, the Choctaw Tribe and others. The Ten Commandments monument has the Mayflower Compact etched on the other side.
"A significant factor is that someone comes and looks at all the monuments on the lawn, they can't just single out the Ten Commandments monument and say, `Ah ha!' and that means government is impermissibly endorsing religion," said Kevin Theriot, an attorney for the Haskell County commissioners.
Micheal Salem, an attorney representing the American Civil Liberties Union and Stigler resident James W. Green, said he thought "the court's decision really represents a loss for religious freedom." He said he would have to thoroughly review White's decision before deciding whether to appeal.
The U.S. Supreme Court has ruled that religious displays on government property are not inherently unconstitutional and must be considered on a case-by-case basis.
©MMVI, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The secrets of tennis legend 



ANY municipality) spending its tax revenues on
statuary of ANY kind ???"
Can it not find more pressing needs?
If placed on grounds of any government, but not
government-funded, that's a different issue --
such as whether there remains room for diversity.
What part of "I am the Lord Thy God, Thou Shall Have No Other Gods Before Me" is religiously neutral? It's the Christian God proclaiming he's the only one. When a government builds a monument to that God the government is endorsing that God.
The only way we can remain a free nation is for the government to be secular and religiously neutral. Anything else is a gross violation of religious freedom and turns America into something else. Something vile that it has never been before. If we wanted to live like that we could move to the middle east.
Or wouldn't it just be better for all of us to take our collective beliefs to neutral areas where we can all celebrate our Democracy as equals, just as we are in the eyes of the real God and not the mentally deficient pseudo-gods.
- by sissy3753 August 19, 2006 7:43 PM EDT
- Why don't the people who are not happy about this monument just stop looking at it.This has to be the dumdest people on earth to gripe about such things that they are not forced to look at it if they don't like it do not go look at it.Is this all you people have to do,get a life.
- Reply to this comment
See all 11 Comments