Prime Suspect
Will New Evidence Give Marty Tankleff A Second Chance?
-
Play CBS Video Video Moriarty's Reporter's Notebook Only On The Web: 48 Hours correspondent Erin Moriarty talks about the case of Marty Tankleff, a Long Island teenager, who was convicted of murdering his parents.
-
-
Tankleff is incarcerated at the Great Meadow Correctional Facility in Comstock, New York. (CBS)
-
Marty Tankleff was a teenager when he confessed to killing his parents. (CBS/48 Hours)
-
-
Interactive Under The Gun Learn more about some interrogation techniques used by police.
-
Interactive Forensics 101 Find out more about forensics, DNA and some cases in which DNA has made a difference.
"The judge described many of the witnesses that came forward as a 'cavalcade of nefarious scoundrels' paraded before this court. What was your reaction?" Moriarty asks Salpeter.
"How dare him," he replies. "These are people who came forward, for what? To be called names? They came forward to help free an innocent man … Do they have a past? Do they have records? Yes. So what?"
The judge even dismissed the testimony of Joe Creedon's son, saying that the 17-year-old may have been trying to protect his mother, who had long been abused by Creedon.
"There's no way if a jury, a new jury, heard what we brought forward into this hearing, that they would not acquit Marty," says Salpeter.
Meanwhile, in prison Marty says he could be doing a lot better. "I was hoping we wouldn't be doing this interview in a prison," he says.
Marty admits he is bitter about the judge's decision. "I think all along I kind of always knew in the back of my head that was probably going to happen, because of all the letdowns, because of Suffolk County. But still, hearing that I was denied a new trial was hard."
"You came in when you were 19 and you're about to turn 35. Is there a side of you that's afraid that you may never get out of here?" Moriarty asks.
"No," Marty says.
And now, Marty and his supporters have new reason to hope. In May 2006, a New York State appeals court agreed to review the judge’s decision. It’s good news for Marty but he’s afraid to get his hopes up.
"There's no level of excitement in any of this. I'm still in prison, my parents were murdered, so there's no excitement or joy in any of this. There's signs of relief, signs of encouragement," he says.
If Marty wins that appeal, he may yet get his chance at freedom. "I'm not afraid of a new trial. I'm not. I think I have more than enough witnesses to prove my innocence, let a jury of my peers evaluate the new evidence," says Marty.
Oral arguments are expected to begin late in 2007.
Marty Tankleff, as a "jailhouse lawyer," helped free an inmate convicted on a false confession.
Tankleff turns 36 later this month. He’s been in prison for nearly 17 years.
©MMVII, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.
- I am a retired police detective and it is true, the Supreme Court says its alright for officer's to lie in order to get a confession, howevere, not to lie in court to get an convection. Sounds to me this guy was in a hurry, did not investigate the crime as he should have, and got the easy person to pick on for a confession. His supervisor is also at blame!
- Reply to this comment
- I have followed this case since the original trial. Back then I was convinced that Marty was innocent (not simply not guilty), and in the past few years as the truth has come out about the real events of that night, it has become even more apparent. I have heard the witnesses speak in the recent hearings, and I believe that they have given us the truth about who did what.
Someone asked about DNA. I believe that there actually is DNA available, but the judge has suppressed it and refuses to allow it to be tested because of a technicality. Others know the details better than I do on this.
As for the DA being "stupid," that is unfair. Before he was elected, he used to say that he believed Marty to be innocent. He was right then. But having been the defense attorney for Todd Steuerman AND for Detective McCready, both of whom were tried for serious offenses, he may be "partial" and unwilling to open up a case that would obviously lead to other guilty parties. It is easier to keep one innocent person in prison than it is to expose former defendants and call into question everything the police did back in those days.
I look forward to meeting Marty face to face, out of prison. God grant that that day come soon. - Reply to this comment
- THIS IS ABSOLUTELY CRIMINAL(!!) ACTION ON THE BEHALF OF MCCREADY AND LATO!! THEY WERE AFRAID OF EXPOSING THEIR INCOMPETENCE AND STUPIDITY (NOW THAT HAS BEEN DONE FOR THEM) AND SO COVERED THEMSELVES BY RUINING A YOUNG MAN'S LIFE. MAY GOD GIVE THEM THEIR DUE!!!!!!!
- Reply to this comment
- I agree these "Public Servants" who work on taxpayers $$$ should be held accountable but since they are not they do whatever they want knowing there are no consequences. I have a brother who is wrongfully convicted as well and his son was murdered. He was run down by the son of the people he was living with? Coincidence? NO Murder! Public officials here turn a blind eye as the murderers father is the DJ for all of the local police functions for free. www.paullitchfield.com
- Reply to this comment
- This case should be reopened, completely redone, with an unbiased team that was not and will not be associated with the arrogant turds that did the first investigation. Who hired that closed minded idiot who lead the primary investigation? He believes he can tell a liar better than scientifically PROVEN methods? I was seriously rolling my eyes at this story. I just feel so bad that this guy never had a chance to truly mourn his parents passing. I do say kudo's to his family for rallying their support. Prayers will be that you come out on top in the end.
- Reply to this comment
- It is hard to believe that Mr McCready said, the Supreme Court says its alright for officer's to lie in order to get a convection. Please tell me I did not hear him say that, Last night 8/11/2007
Jewel681 - Reply to this comment
- Is there no DNA from the mother? She obivously fought her attacker. Just goes to show ... even our justice system can be bought.
- Reply to this comment
- JUDGES, JUDGES, what are we to do with the imbeciles on the bench in this United States, look at the case in New Jersey the guy that is under arrest is an illegal he has been to that court they say 6 times and not once did this judge turn him into the Immigration dept. let alone try and deport him, I feel our justice system is KUPUT!!! Even the Wash.D.C. Justice dept if that is what you want to call it. Not the U.S.Attorneys the people running it. If they finally convict that guy in New Jersey and deport him how many want to make a bet he will be back in the USA pronto.
- Reply to this comment
- My gut feeling is Marty is innocent. McCready and Lato should be penalized for their stupidity. When people lack intelligence they are overflowing with deception. And that is how this system keeps its department at 94% with threats, manipulation and deception. The kid was living in the utmost comfort, he was going to get his inheritance when he was 25 like Prince William. Lato and McCready, are paying lip service to the affluent.Whether the convictions were based on truth or not, these people are not looking for truth, they are looking for that loophole that will enable them to get their conviction and their paycheck. Never allow any cop to interview you without a lawyer present. Effective interrogation takes an intelligent interrogator to get the truth and clearly McCready is extremely lacking in this skill. I mean these guys are so lacking in frontal lobe substance, their conscious allows them to sleep at night.
- Reply to this comment
- I have never been so disgusted about a conviction as this one. This guy is clearly innocent. Was Lato watching the interview with the original detective. That moron should be in jail for a travesty of justice. It is obvious who killed his parents. The partner is living in luxury in Boca.I think the original jury must have been on drugs. This guy needs a new trial soon.
- Reply to this comment
- I agree with DeborahCox05, also from personal experience. Innocent until proven guilty is a myth. When you are chosen as a suspect, no matter what the reason or whim, without a lot of money, you're going to prison. Even this boy, with money, is the victim of blatant obstruction of justice. Even with the amount of people being proven innocent through DNA, the prosecutor's are complaining that they should stay in jail. This is outright showing how unbalanced our criminal justice system is. I think the only way this can correct itself is for us to hold prosecutor's like this one criminally responsible for their actions.
- Reply to this comment
- My son's dad was part of a "false confession" and received 20 yrs because of it. He was told that if he went to trial that a jury would sentence him to death. He had a court appointed attorney that turned out to be his ex-wife's divorce attorney. No one told him that he could request another attorney. He has gotten a raw deal all the way around and no one will help him. Medical evidence didn't add up to prove he was guilty. He didn't get good advice.
- Reply to this comment
I have never before felt compelled to speak out for people that I%u2019ve never met and mean nothing to me. However, I%u2019ve never known of a situation in which an assistant District Attorney so blatantly disregarded his responsibility to seek the truth.
I do not know whether Marty Tankleff is innocent or guilty of murdering his parents. However, it is abundantly clear that Leonard Lato is actually hindering the process of discovering who should pay for the horrible murder of the Tankleff%u2019s, by not allowing a new trial.
%u2022 The police never investigated anyone other than Tankleff
%u2022 Too many people, with too little ulterior motive are speaking up on behalf of Tankleff and against Creedon
%u2022 It is absurd not to give immunity to Glenn Harris and hear what he has to say about the gloves and his involvement
Whoever is found guilty by a jury, who has all of the new information and witnesses, should pay for the crime.- Reply to this comment
- You know what you have to have for probably cause to arrest someone in the U.S.?
NOTHING!! The police do NOT have to investigate anything. That is the big joke about our system.
You know what an attorney told me once? Here you go:
If he and I had a meeting that morning and he had cut his face shaving, and for whatever reason he decided to give a sworn statement to the police that I had cut his face in an attack, the police would have probable cause to arrest me!
It is then my responsibility to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that I was innocent!
You are not innocent until proven guilty! You are guilty until you can prove yourself innocent!
Our justice system is the "just-us" system and the cops are out of control!
They are not here to serve and protect. They are all about getting a conviction - RIGHT OR WRONG!
This is my PERSONAL EXPERIENCE! - Reply to this comment


