February 16, 2006 11:12 AM
- Text
Few Would Choose Baby's Sex
U.S. scientists warned back in 2008 that Port-au-Prince was ripe for a catastrophic earthquake, but they had no way of predicting exactly when. Advances are being made, but that kind of precision is still in the future. (CBS)
(WebMD)
Given the chance, most people wouldn't choose the sex of their baby before conception, a new survey shows.
The study, published in Fertility and Sterility, is based on an Internet survey of 1,197 men and women aged 18-45 years old. The survey has a sampling error of plus or minus 3 percent.
Between 8 percent and 18 percent of participants stated that they would use medical technology described in the survey to choose whether to have a boy or girl.
"Perhaps this speaks to the fact that people still want to leave things up to chance and not rely on science for everything," researcher Tarun Jain, MD, says in a news release from the University of Illinois at Chicago, where Jain works.
Choosing Boy Or Girl
The survey stated that "it may soon be possible for parents to choose the sex of their children" and described three hypothetical scenarios:
Boy-Girl Preference
The survey also gauged preferences for baby boys or girls.
Participants were asked if they would rather have a boy or girl as their first child. Their answers:
Reality Check
"There can sometimes be quite a difference between what people say and what they actually do," the researchers write, adding that they find it "quite reassuring" to have found similar results in other studies.
"It is only a matter of time before preconception sex selection technology becomes widely available and marketed throughout the United States," write Jain and colleagues.
"With the numerous ethical issues posed by use of such technology, our study provides some reassurance that preconception sex selection is unlikely to be used by the majority of the population and is unlikely to have a significant impact on the natural sex ratio."
Sources: Dahl, E. Fertility and Sterility, February 2006; vol 85: pp 468-473. News release, University of Illinois at Chicago.
By Miranda Hitti
Reviewed by Brunilda Nazario, MD
© 2006, WebMD Inc. All rights reserved
The study, published in Fertility and Sterility, is based on an Internet survey of 1,197 men and women aged 18-45 years old. The survey has a sampling error of plus or minus 3 percent.
Between 8 percent and 18 percent of participants stated that they would use medical technology described in the survey to choose whether to have a boy or girl.
"Perhaps this speaks to the fact that people still want to leave things up to chance and not rely on science for everything," researcher Tarun Jain, MD, says in a news release from the University of Illinois at Chicago, where Jain works.
Choosing Boy Or Girl
The survey stated that "it may soon be possible for parents to choose the sex of their children" and described three hypothetical scenarios:
- Scenario No. 1: Go to a fertility center, provide a sperm sample, undergo 3 to 5 cycles of intrauterine insemination, and pay a fee of about $2,500.
- Scenario No. 2: Get one cycle of intrauterine insemination at any doctor's office, with full coverage by health insurance.
- Scenario No. 3: Take a blue pill to ensure the birth of a boy or a pink pill for a girl.
- Scenario No. 1: 8 percent said yes, 74 percent said no, and 18 percent were undecided
- Scenario No. 2: 12 percent said yes, 64 percent said no, and 24 percent were undecided
- Scenario No. 3: 18 percent said yes, 59 percent said no, and 22 percent were undecided
Boy-Girl Preference
The survey also gauged preferences for baby boys or girls.
Participants were asked if they would rather have a boy or girl as their first child. Their answers:
- No preference: 42 percent
- Boy: 39 percent
- Girl: 19 percent
- Equal numbers of boys and girls: 50 percent
- No preference: 27 percent
- More boys than girls: 7 percent
- More girls than boys: 6 percent
- Only boys: 5 percent
- Only girls: 4 percent
Reality Check
"There can sometimes be quite a difference between what people say and what they actually do," the researchers write, adding that they find it "quite reassuring" to have found similar results in other studies.
"It is only a matter of time before preconception sex selection technology becomes widely available and marketed throughout the United States," write Jain and colleagues.
"With the numerous ethical issues posed by use of such technology, our study provides some reassurance that preconception sex selection is unlikely to be used by the majority of the population and is unlikely to have a significant impact on the natural sex ratio."
Sources: Dahl, E. Fertility and Sterility, February 2006; vol 85: pp 468-473. News release, University of Illinois at Chicago.
By Miranda Hitti
Reviewed by Brunilda Nazario, MD
© 2006, WebMD Inc. All rights reserved
Popular Now in Health
- Cancer drug reverses Alzheimer's in mice: Study
- 4.5 million Americans over 50 have artificial knees
- Marijuana-smoking motorists twice as likely to crash
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- HealthPop: Online dating and jaw engraving
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- Christina Hendricks: Too Big for Hollywood?
- Whitney Houston back in rehab: Why?
- John Dye Dies: What Killed "Angel" Star?
- Online dating downsides, romantic tattoo gone wrong: HealthPop Valentine's Day video
- Woman spotlights uterus didelphys on talk show
- 8 Tips For Losing Weight After Pregnancy
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
- Demi Moore's hospitalization spotlights whippets
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- Anti-Rape Condoms Fight World Cup Sex Assault
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Induced labor allows dying man to see daughter
- List of Grammy winners in select major categories
- US Airways jet makes emergency landing in NC
- Airbus CEO warns of trade conflict over carbon tax
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






