Study: Low-Fat Diet Big Letdown
Data On Older Women: It Hardly Mattered Vs. Some Cancers, Heart Disease
-
Play CBS Video
Video
Are Low-Fat Diets Ineffective?
New research shows that a low-fat diet may not have any significant health benefits, especially for post-menopausal women. Dr. Emily Senay explained the shocking results of the 8-year study.
-
Video
HealthWatch
Melissa McDermott reports on a study that says low-fat diets may not reduce cancer risks in older women, encouraging long-term signs for premature infants, and calcium deficiency in kids and teens.
-
Video
Is Cutting The Fat Overrated?
A study on the link between a low-fat diet and disease in women has turned up results that seem to challenge conventional wisdom. Elizabeth Kaledin has more.
-
Photo
(AP/CBS)
-
Interactive
Diet And Nutrition
Are you eating right? See the government's guidelines, calculate your body mass index and quiz yourself on healthy food choices.
-
Interactive
Cancer
Learn about the most common cancers, who gets them and how they are treated.
-
Interactive
Heart Disease
Learn more about different types of heart disease, explore different treatments and assess your own risk.
And, yet, after spending $415 million trying to get nearly 20,000 mostly overweight postmenopausal women to radically change their eating habits in hopes of reducing cancer and heart disease, researchers are acknowledging less than spectacular results.
After an average of roughly eight years, there was little difference in rates of breast cancer, colorectal cancer and heart disease in women who reduced their fat consumption than among nearly 30,000 study participants who didn't.
"I was surprised," said LaCour, a 66-year-old Seattle-area participant. "I thought there would be more definitive answers about the value of the low-fat diet."
The researchers did, too. Even so, scientists say the results don't mean dieters should just throw up their hands and eat cake.
Researchers suggested that the participants — with an average age of 62 — may have started their healthy eating too late. They also didn't reduce fats as much as the diet demanded. And while some initially lost a few pounds, the diet was not designed for weight loss and most remained overweight, a major risk factor for cancer and heart problems.
The results appear in Wednesday's Journal of the American Medical Association.
Heart and cancer specialists said the overall results were not surprising, since scientific thinking on the role different fats play in disease prevention has evolved since this study was designed.
The diet "focused on reduction in total fat and did not differentiate between the so-called good fats and bad fats," said Dr. Elizabeth Nabel, director of the National Heart, Lung and Blood Institute, the study's sponsor.
Reducing "bad" fats including saturated and trans fats found in processed and fried foods, and increasing consumption of "good fats" including olive oil, might have yielded better results, especially for heart disease, the researchers and other scientists said.
"These results do not suggest that people have carte blanche to eat fatty foods without health problems," said Dr. JoAnn Manson, chief of preventive medicine at Harvard's Brigham and Women's Hospital, a co-author of the study.
"Don't throw the baby out with the bathwater," stressed The Early Show medical correspondent Dr. Emily Senay Wednesday. "It would be a shame if women … read this and thought, "I can throw all my lifestyle interventions away. They don't matter.' They probably do, but maybe not exactly as they should, in this trial.
"We have to eat healthy. We have to exercise. We have to maintain a healthy weight. We have to not smoke. These things, in many other trials, have been shown over and over again to reduce the risk of all these diseases."
©MMVI, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.


