February 11, 2009 6:52 PM
- Text
Md. Pushes Wal-Mart On Health Care
(AP)
Maryland has become the first state in the nation to require Wal-Mart to spend more on employee health care or pay the difference into the state's Medicaid fund. Similar laws may be coming elsewhere.
The measure approved Thursday requires companies with more than 10,000 Maryland employees to spend at least 8 percent of their payroll on employee health care or pay the difference into the state-supported Medicaid program. Of the state's large employers, only Wal-Mart spends less than 8 percent on health care.
Labor unions, who heavily pushed for the bill, said they would pursue similar legislation in at least 30 other states, focusing first on Colorado, Connecticut and Washington.
"The tide is turning because working people are not just fed up they are ready to get active to set our country in a different direction, one state at a time," AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said in a statement.
Maryland's Democratic-controlled Legislature overrode a veto by Republican Gov. Robert Ehrlich.
Critics of the legislation called it a dangerous precedent that ultimately would cost Maryland jobs.
The company employs about 17,000 Maryland residents at more than 40 Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores, and about 1.3 million people nationwide.
A Wal-Mart executive called the bill a poorly worded mandate for a single company. Mia Masten, a director of corporate affairs, said the bill "could be the beginning of a slippery slope."
"We believe everyone should have access to affordable health insurance, although this legislation does nothing to accomplish that," said Masten, who said the retailing giant may partially pull out of the state if the bill becomes law.
She said Wal-Mart was unfairly singled out because of "partisan politics" and that Medicaid's problems go beyond the behavior of one company.
"This does nothing to accomplish this goal of providing everyone access to affordable health care insurance," said Sarah Clark, a spokeswoman for the Bentonville, Ark.-based company.
A spokesman for Ehrlich said the governor was disappointed in the vote and that it may put in jeopardy a planned Wal-Mart distribution center slated for Maryland's Eastern Shore.
The measure approved Thursday requires companies with more than 10,000 Maryland employees to spend at least 8 percent of their payroll on employee health care or pay the difference into the state-supported Medicaid program. Of the state's large employers, only Wal-Mart spends less than 8 percent on health care.
Labor unions, who heavily pushed for the bill, said they would pursue similar legislation in at least 30 other states, focusing first on Colorado, Connecticut and Washington.
"The tide is turning because working people are not just fed up they are ready to get active to set our country in a different direction, one state at a time," AFL-CIO President John Sweeney said in a statement.
Maryland's Democratic-controlled Legislature overrode a veto by Republican Gov. Robert Ehrlich.
Critics of the legislation called it a dangerous precedent that ultimately would cost Maryland jobs.
The company employs about 17,000 Maryland residents at more than 40 Wal-Mart and Sam's Club stores, and about 1.3 million people nationwide.
A Wal-Mart executive called the bill a poorly worded mandate for a single company. Mia Masten, a director of corporate affairs, said the bill "could be the beginning of a slippery slope."
"We believe everyone should have access to affordable health insurance, although this legislation does nothing to accomplish that," said Masten, who said the retailing giant may partially pull out of the state if the bill becomes law.
She said Wal-Mart was unfairly singled out because of "partisan politics" and that Medicaid's problems go beyond the behavior of one company.
"This does nothing to accomplish this goal of providing everyone access to affordable health care insurance," said Sarah Clark, a spokeswoman for the Bentonville, Ark.-based company.
A spokesman for Ehrlich said the governor was disappointed in the vote and that it may put in jeopardy a planned Wal-Mart distribution center slated for Maryland's Eastern Shore.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Latest Now in MoneyWatch
- Greek pols approve harsh austerity after riots
- Unpopular austerity package ignites Greece protests
- This week: Budget, Greece, housing, and inflation
- Previewing Obama's 2013 budget: Politics rule
- Clashes as Greek Parliament debates bailout law
- Ohio unemployment hits 3-year-low
- Jill on Money: Retirement investing, allocation, long term care
- Could "web-lining" be dangerous?
- Insurers respond cautiously to contraceptive plan
- Judge: Legally, breastfeeding not related to pregnancy
- Budget deficit drops to $27 billion in January
- Why the Powerball Jackpot is part of my investment strategy
- Is the new VW Beetle diesel worth the money?
- Consumer sentiment highlights risks to recovery
- Valentine blues? 10 best cities to be single
- December trade deficit widens to $48.8 billion
- Alcatel-Lucent returns to profit in 2011
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Adele tells Vogue she's done with break-up music
- Jefferson leads Jazz to 98-88 win over Grizzlies
- Trial opens 2 years after feds break up militia
- Pastor's daughter accidentally shot at Fla. church
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






