February 11, 2009 6:55 PM
- Text
Gonzales Defends Domestic Spying
(CBS/AP)
Responding to a congressional uproar, Attorney General Alberto Gonzales said Monday that Congress had essentially given President Bush the authority for domestic surveillance after the Sept. 11 attacks.
In a round of television appearances, Gonzales provided a more detailed legal rationale for Mr. Bush's decision authorizing the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on international phone calls and e-mails of people within the United States without seeking warrants from courts.
Gonzales said he had begun meeting with members of Congress on the Bush administration's view that Congress' authorization of the use of military force after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks was ample authorization for the surveillance.
"Our position is that the authorization to use military force which was passed by the Congress shortly after Sept. 11 constitutes that authority," Gonzales said on CBS News' The Early Show.
It was the most detailed legal explanation given by an administration official since the New York Times reported Thursday that since October 2001 Mr. Bush had authorized the NSA to conduct the surveillance.
Gonzales said Congress' action after Sept. 11 essentially "does give permission for the president of the United States to engage in this kind of very limited, targeted electronic surveillance against our enemy."
The domestic spying revelations have outraged members of Congress, with Democrats and Republicans alike calling for an investigation.
The president has, I think, made up a law that we never passed," said Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis.
Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he intends to hold hearings.
"They talk about constitutional authority," Specter said. "There are limits as to what the president can do."
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada also called for an investigation, and House Democratic leaders asked Speaker Dennis Hastert to create a bipartisan panel to do the same.
President Bush, in a rare live address, said congressional leaders have been apprised of the secret order "more than a dozen times."
First Amendment legal expert Floyd Abrams told CBS News correspondent Randall Pinkston the president is attempting to mitigate his sidestepping of Congress by saying he had informed some lawmakers.
"It is mitigated in the sense that Congress was not completely uninformed," Abrams said. "As a legal matter though, what the president has authorized 30 times may have been illegal 30 times."
Read excerpts of CBS News correspondent Randall Pinkston's interview with Abrams.
"It's been briefed to the Congress over a dozen times, and, in fact, it is a program that is, by every effort we've been able to make, consistent with the statutes and with the law," Vice President Dick Cheney said Sunday in a televised interview to be broadcast Monday evening: "It's the kind of capability if we'd had before 9/11 might have led us to be able to prevent 9/11."
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said there were no objections raised by lawmakers who were told about it.
"That's a legitimate part of the equation," McCain said. But he said President Bush still needs to explain why he chose to ignore the law that requires approval of a special court for domestic wiretaps.
In a round of television appearances, Gonzales provided a more detailed legal rationale for Mr. Bush's decision authorizing the National Security Agency to eavesdrop on international phone calls and e-mails of people within the United States without seeking warrants from courts.
Gonzales said he had begun meeting with members of Congress on the Bush administration's view that Congress' authorization of the use of military force after the Sept. 11, 2001 attacks was ample authorization for the surveillance.
"Our position is that the authorization to use military force which was passed by the Congress shortly after Sept. 11 constitutes that authority," Gonzales said on CBS News' The Early Show.
It was the most detailed legal explanation given by an administration official since the New York Times reported Thursday that since October 2001 Mr. Bush had authorized the NSA to conduct the surveillance.
Gonzales said Congress' action after Sept. 11 essentially "does give permission for the president of the United States to engage in this kind of very limited, targeted electronic surveillance against our enemy."
The domestic spying revelations have outraged members of Congress, with Democrats and Republicans alike calling for an investigation.
The president has, I think, made up a law that we never passed," said Sen. Russell Feingold, D-Wis.
Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee, said he intends to hold hearings.
"They talk about constitutional authority," Specter said. "There are limits as to what the president can do."
Senate Democratic Leader Harry Reid of Nevada also called for an investigation, and House Democratic leaders asked Speaker Dennis Hastert to create a bipartisan panel to do the same.
President Bush, in a rare live address, said congressional leaders have been apprised of the secret order "more than a dozen times."
First Amendment legal expert Floyd Abrams told CBS News correspondent Randall Pinkston the president is attempting to mitigate his sidestepping of Congress by saying he had informed some lawmakers.
"It is mitigated in the sense that Congress was not completely uninformed," Abrams said. "As a legal matter though, what the president has authorized 30 times may have been illegal 30 times."
Read excerpts of CBS News correspondent Randall Pinkston's interview with Abrams.
"It's been briefed to the Congress over a dozen times, and, in fact, it is a program that is, by every effort we've been able to make, consistent with the statutes and with the law," Vice President Dick Cheney said Sunday in a televised interview to be broadcast Monday evening: "It's the kind of capability if we'd had before 9/11 might have led us to be able to prevent 9/11."
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said there were no objections raised by lawmakers who were told about it.
"That's a legitimate part of the equation," McCain said. But he said President Bush still needs to explain why he chose to ignore the law that requires approval of a special court for domestic wiretaps.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Popular Now in Politics
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Sarah Palin revs up CPAC faithful
- Mitt Romney wins Maine GOP caucuses
- CPAC: Anti-Obama beats pro-Romney
- Ann Coulter riles up the CPAC crowd
- Romney takes on hecklers at Maine town hall
- Romney on Obama: I will "knock him on his heels"
- Mitt Romney wins CPAC straw poll
- Gov. Jindal prepping for national stage
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- Immigration speaker sparks controversy at CPAC
- Santorum infers straw poll-rigging at CPAC
- What Does 'GOP' Stand For?
- Health Care Bill: What's In It?
- Timothy Dolan: Birth control tweak a "first step"
- After uproar, Obama tweaks birth control rule
- Santorum: Women could bring "emotions" to combat
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Armstrong finishes 2nd in ironman, snubs winner?
- Houston's cousin Dionne Warwick postpones Pa. show
- Spain court shelves bribery probe of star judge
- Cameron to hold talks on Scotland independence
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






