February 11, 2009 7:10 PM
- Text
Poll: Opinion Of Roberts Undecided
(CBS)
As confirmation hearings begin on the nomination of John Roberts as Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, many Americans haven't yet made up their minds about the nominee. According to a CBS News Poll taken from Aug. 29 - Aug. 31, 49 percent of those surveyed could not say whether they thought Roberts should or should not be confirmed. Thirty-five percent said he should be, and 10 percent said he should not.
The change of Roberts' nomination from Associate Justice to Chief Justice hasn't made much difference in those views. They are similar to last week when a CBS News Poll from Aug. 29-31 asked Americans if Roberts should be confirmed as an Associate Justice: then, as now, most could not say.
SHOULD ROBERTS BE CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE AS…?
Chief Justice, Sept. 6-7
Yes
35%
No
10%
Can't say
49%
Associate Justice, Aug. 29-31
Yes
26%
No
9%
Can't say
60%
Almost two-thirds of Republicans today want Roberts confirmed, with another third unable to say yet. Most Democrats are withholding judgment, with six in ten unable to say what should happen yet. Just one in five Democrats is opposed to the nomination right now.
Recent history suggests that the public is reluctant to weigh in on a particular nominee before confirmation hearings commence. Prior to confirmation hearings for then-nominee Clarence Thomas, 59 percent couldn't say whether or not he should be confirmed. Also, before Robert Bork's confirmation hearings in 1987, 66 percent couldn't say decide whether he should be confirmed or not.
SHOULD ... BE CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE?
Roberts, Sept. 6-7
Yes
35%
No
10%
Can't say
49%
Thomas, Sept. 1991
Yes
24%
No
11%
Can't say
59%
Bork, Sept. 1987
Yes
14%
No
13%
Can't say
66%
Thinking ahead to what topics hearings ought to be covered, most Americans say a Court nominee's positions on issues – and not just his or her legal background - should be considered in the hearings. In the late August poll, 57 percent said a nominee's opinions on issues should be considered in a nomination process, while 33 percent thought the Senate should consider only a nominee's legal qualifications and background. This marks a change from July, when fewer Americans wanted such considerations, and also higher than during the nomination processes of Clarence Thomas and Robert Bork.
WHEN EVALUATING A COURT NOMINEE, SENATE SHOULD CONSIDER:
Roberts, Aug. 29-31
Legal qualifications only
33%
Positions on issues also
57%
Roberts, July 2005
Legal qualifications only
46%
Positions on issues also
46%
Thomas, Sept. 1991
Legal qualifications only
39%
Positions on issues also
49%
Bork, Sept. 1987
Legal qualifications only
39%
Positions on issues also
52%
The change of Roberts' nomination from Associate Justice to Chief Justice hasn't made much difference in those views. They are similar to last week when a CBS News Poll from Aug. 29-31 asked Americans if Roberts should be confirmed as an Associate Justice: then, as now, most could not say.
SHOULD ROBERTS BE CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE AS…?
Chief Justice, Sept. 6-7
Yes
No
Can't say
Associate Justice, Aug. 29-31
Yes
No
Can't say
Almost two-thirds of Republicans today want Roberts confirmed, with another third unable to say yet. Most Democrats are withholding judgment, with six in ten unable to say what should happen yet. Just one in five Democrats is opposed to the nomination right now.
Recent history suggests that the public is reluctant to weigh in on a particular nominee before confirmation hearings commence. Prior to confirmation hearings for then-nominee Clarence Thomas, 59 percent couldn't say whether or not he should be confirmed. Also, before Robert Bork's confirmation hearings in 1987, 66 percent couldn't say decide whether he should be confirmed or not.
SHOULD ... BE CONFIRMED BY THE SENATE?
Roberts, Sept. 6-7
Yes
No
Can't say
Thomas, Sept. 1991
Yes
No
Can't say
Bork, Sept. 1987
Yes
No
Can't say
Thinking ahead to what topics hearings ought to be covered, most Americans say a Court nominee's positions on issues – and not just his or her legal background - should be considered in the hearings. In the late August poll, 57 percent said a nominee's opinions on issues should be considered in a nomination process, while 33 percent thought the Senate should consider only a nominee's legal qualifications and background. This marks a change from July, when fewer Americans wanted such considerations, and also higher than during the nomination processes of Clarence Thomas and Robert Bork.
WHEN EVALUATING A COURT NOMINEE, SENATE SHOULD CONSIDER:
Roberts, Aug. 29-31
Legal qualifications only
Positions on issues also
Roberts, July 2005
Legal qualifications only
Positions on issues also
Thomas, Sept. 1991
Legal qualifications only
Positions on issues also
Bork, Sept. 1987
Legal qualifications only
Positions on issues also
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Popular Now in CBSNews.com
- The Decline and Fall of the American Empire
- Top Twelve Most Patriotic Songs Ever
- Bush's Final Approval Rating: 22 Percent
- Time For Marijuana Legalization?
- Here's Why People Don't Buy Global Warming
- Poll: Majority Believe In Ghosts
- Fake War Stories Exposed
- Poll: Majority Reject Evolution
- The Football Legacy Of Joe Namath
- Make Marijuana Legal
- The Best Health Care System in the World?
- The Trouble With Tall People
- Poll: Blacks See Improved Race Relations
- Poll: Creationism Trumps Evolution
- America's Eighth Amendment Absurdity
- Autoworkers Making $70 An Hour? Not Really
- How And Where America Eats
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Pakistan top court charges PM with contempt
- Taliban announce death of ex-defense minister
- AT&T customers surprised by 'unlimited data' limit
- Vodafone ponder bids for Cable & Wireless
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






