Humans On Display At London's Zoo

(AP)  At London Zoo, you can talk to the animals — and now some of them talk back.

Caged and barely clothed within a rocky enclosure, eight British men and women monkeyed around Friday for an amused, bemused crowd behind a sign reading "Warning: Humans in their Natural Environment."

The captives in the Human Zoo exhibit sunned themselves on a rock ledge, clad in bathing suits and pinned-on fig leaves. Some played with hula hoops, some waved. A signboard informed visitors about the species' diet, habitat, worldwide distribution and threats.

Visitors stopped to point and laugh, and several children could be heard asking "why are there people in there?"

London Zoo spokeswoman Polly Wills said that's exactly the question the zoo wants to answer.

"Seeing people in a different environment, among other animals ... teaches members of the public that the human is just another primate," Wills said. It also, she conceded, lets them "have a gawk at people."

The exhibit, which opened Friday, puts the three male and five female Homo sapiens side by side with their primate relatives — though separated from them by an electric fence. While their neighbors might enjoy bananas and a good scratch, these eight — chosen from 30 applicants who entered an online contest — have diverse interests, from a chemist hoping to raise awareness about apes to a self-described actor/model and fitness enthusiast.

Chemist Tom Mahoney, 26, decided to participate after his friend sent him an e-mail about the contest as a joke. Anything that draws attention to apes, he said, has his support.

"A lot of people think humans are above other animals," he said. "When they see humans as animals, here, it kind of reminds us that we're not that special."

Actor Brendan Carr, 25, won his place by submitting a spot of anthropomorphic verse: "I'm funky like a monkey and as cool as a cat, talk more than a parrot, up all night like a bat."

Visitors' reactions to the spectacle varied Friday. Pointing at one heavily muscled and gleaming body on the ledge, a visitor joked that the zoo should consider a breeding program.

• 1
• 2
• Next Page »

[bsrasmus]

Who do they think they are kidding? It's absolutely obvious that people are not "just another primate". Those people may be in a cage, but they don't live there. Those people in the cage are legally answerable for their conduct because they are capable of making moral decisions. If a human "captive" were to kill one of the other human "captives" they would rightly have to answer for their conduct. But a monkey that kills another monkey may just be segregated from the other monkeys for a crime. Why the different standards? Because a monkey doesn't and can't know right from wrong. But people can. People have a conscience that the "other" primates don't have. It could be pointed out that people are far more intelligent, far more capable of adapting to their environment, far more valuable than "other" primates. And each of those points are all equally obvious. But the moral dimension of mankind is sufficiently, overwhelmingly, significant. Enough of the "man is just another animal" garbage.

[bsrasmus]

That is... But a monkey that kills another monkey may just be segregated from the other monkeys for a *time*.

[rf35]

I'm actually a little surprised the Brits made them wear swimsuits under the fig leaves...or even the fig leaves, for that matter.