Jail Next Stop For 2 Journalists?
High Court Ruling Could Put Time's Cooper, NYT's Miller Behind Bars
-
Play CBS Video Video Court: File Sharing Illegal The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that those who download music and movies, along with their Web sites, are liable for illegal swapping. CBS News' Alexis Chistoforous reports.
-
Video Court Split On Commandments The Supreme Court ruled that the Ten Commandments may be displayed on the grounds of the Texas capitol, but they may not be placed in Kentucky courthouses. CBS News' Jennifer Donelan reports.
-
Video Reporters Could Be Jail Bound The Supreme Court turned aside their appeals, and now two reporters could soon go to jail for refusing to identify their sources. Jim Axelrod spoke to one of them, the New York Times' Judith Miller.
-
New York Times reporter Judith Miller, left, and Time Magazine reporter Matt Cooper talk to reporters outside federal court in Washington. (2004 photo) (AP)
-
Interactive The Leak: Key Players People, events and connections in the leak of a CIA operative's name.
-
Interactive The Supreme Court History, traditions and key cases, plus what it takes to get on the bench.
-
Interactive History Of Press Freedom Follow the evolving struggles over press freedom in the United States.
But Fitzgerald said in his own filing that the federal government is different. "Local jurisdictions do not have responsibility for investigating crimes implicating national security, and reason and experience strongly counsel against adoption of an absolute reporter's privilege in the federal courts," he said.
"That 49 states and many countries around the globe provide broad protection for journalists who have promised confidentiality to their sources, makes today's decision even more disappointing," said Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr., publisher of The New York Times.
In the last journalist source case at the Supreme Court, the 1972 Branzburg v. Hayes, a divided court ruled against a Louisville, Ky., reporter who had written a story about drug trafficking and was called to testify about it. Justices said that requiring journalists to reveal information to grand juries served a "compelling" state interest and did not violate the First Amendment.
That decision has been interpreted differently and clarification is needed because dozens of reporters around the country have been subpoenaed over the past two years, said Washington lawyer Miguel Estrada, representing Time magazine.
Still pending before a federal appeals court is a contempt ruling against five journalists — including Associated Press reporter H. Josef Hebert — who have refused to identify their sources for stories on Wen Ho Lee, the nuclear scientist whose career was cut short when his name surfaced as an espionage suspect.
Lee is suing the government for leaking his name to the news media during a political frenzy late in the Clinton administration when Republicans accused the White House of ignoring China's alleged theft of U.S. nuclear secrets. The other journalists include Los Angeles Times reporter Robert Drogin, James Risen and Jeff Gerth of The New York Times, and Pierre Thomas, formerly of CNN and now of ABC.
©MMV, The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.




