February 11, 2009 7:23 PM
- Text
Merck Could Face 100K Vioxx Suits
A federal judge told dozens of lawyers crowded into a courtroom here Monday that there could ultimately be up to 100,000 cases filed against Merck over its now-withdrawn pain reliever Vioxx, and that he could hear a case as early as the fall.
There have been more than 2,000 cases filed against the New Jersey-based drugmaker so far. The pretrial issues for federal cases are being handled by U.S. District Court Judge Eldon Fallon, and lawyers from both sides met here for a monthly status conference.
Analysts have estimated that Merck's potential liability could reach $18 billion. Merck withdrew Vioxx from the market last September after a study showed it doubled patients' risk of heart attacks and stroke in people taking the drug longer than 18 months.
The plaintiff's attorneys are squabbling with Merck over records of thousands of company employees engaged in marketing the drug. A lawyer for Merck told the court Monday it would be "tremendously burdensome" to provide the information. The lead plaintiffs' lawyer, Russell Herman, countered afterward that Merck's sales representatives were "told to dodge" potentially awkward questions. Plaintiffs cite an internal Merck document with instructions to the representatives, referred to as "Dodge Ball Vioxx" in a court filing.
© 2009 The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. There have been more than 2,000 cases filed against the New Jersey-based drugmaker so far. The pretrial issues for federal cases are being handled by U.S. District Court Judge Eldon Fallon, and lawyers from both sides met here for a monthly status conference.
Analysts have estimated that Merck's potential liability could reach $18 billion. Merck withdrew Vioxx from the market last September after a study showed it doubled patients' risk of heart attacks and stroke in people taking the drug longer than 18 months.
The plaintiff's attorneys are squabbling with Merck over records of thousands of company employees engaged in marketing the drug. A lawyer for Merck told the court Monday it would be "tremendously burdensome" to provide the information. The lead plaintiffs' lawyer, Russell Herman, countered afterward that Merck's sales representatives were "told to dodge" potentially awkward questions. Plaintiffs cite an internal Merck document with instructions to the representatives, referred to as "Dodge Ball Vioxx" in a court filing.
- 1
- 2
- Next Page »
Add A Comment +
Popular Now in Health
- Report: 10-year-old Colombian girl gives birth
- NASA scientists develop new osteoporosis test
- Ga. woman battling flesh-eating bacteria speaks
- Less couch, more veggies tied to healthier habits
- Obesity stigma still lingers after weight loss
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Christina Hendricks: Too Big for Hollywood?
- Scientists reveal key childhood cancer data
- For Women, Beer and Psoriasis Link
- Being an optimist may lead to long life
- Consumer Reports rates top sunscreens for 2012
- Harold Dow's Death Blamed on Asthma
- Salmonella dog food scare causes recall
- Birth control pills more likely to fail than IUDs
- Report: S.C. mom contracts flesh-eating illness
- Time breastfeeding cover sparks debate






