February 11, 2009 7:31 PM
- Text
Auto Safety Or Auto Privacy?
(AP)
Raymon Holmberg didn't know his new sedan came equipped with the long arm of the law. The dealer hadn't bothered to mention the "black box," a computer chip that stores information on speed and seat belt use.
"When I bought my car," he said, "I didn't realize I was also buying a highway patrolman to sit in the back seat."
Holmberg, a state senator, believes his privacy was violated and is taking aim at black boxes. Lawmakers in 10 other states are also hoping to regulate black boxes, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The bill Holmberg is sponsoring — now up for Senate consideration after being approved Wednesday by the House — would require buyers to be told if their new car or truck is equipped with a black box. It would also prohibit the data from being used in court unless there is a court order. Subscription services such as OnStar, which can be used to track a vehicle's movements, would be exempt.
Its most vocal critics are auto manufacturers. For General Motors, said lobbyist Thomas Kelsch, it makes no sense to bar information from the computer chip from being used in court.
"What's the societal good that would result from the suppression of valuable crash data?" Kelsch asked.
But Holmberg, a Grand Forks Republican, again raises the privacy issue. He worries the data could be used to track driving habits or be used against a driver who has an accident.
"When I bought my car," he said, "I didn't realize I was also buying a highway patrolman to sit in the back seat."
Holmberg, a state senator, believes his privacy was violated and is taking aim at black boxes. Lawmakers in 10 other states are also hoping to regulate black boxes, according to the National Conference of State Legislatures.
The bill Holmberg is sponsoring — now up for Senate consideration after being approved Wednesday by the House — would require buyers to be told if their new car or truck is equipped with a black box. It would also prohibit the data from being used in court unless there is a court order. Subscription services such as OnStar, which can be used to track a vehicle's movements, would be exempt.
Its most vocal critics are auto manufacturers. For General Motors, said lobbyist Thomas Kelsch, it makes no sense to bar information from the computer chip from being used in court.
"What's the societal good that would result from the suppression of valuable crash data?" Kelsch asked.
But Holmberg, a Grand Forks Republican, again raises the privacy issue. He worries the data could be used to track driving habits or be used against a driver who has an accident.
- 1
- 2
- 3
- Next Page »
Popular Now in SciTech
- Retro Duo will play your old Nintendo games
- Apple iPad 3 rumors: thicker, sharper, coming soon
- Happy 50th to computer game Spacewar
- Tesla's Model X: Finally, an electric car we all want
- Apple iPhone 5 rumors, reports say June release
- iPad 3 mini on the way, says analyst
- Apple iPad 3 rumors resurface, sources say March release
- Facebook required for Spotify account, here's a trick
- Obama's 2012 campaign playlist now on Spotify
- Facebook graffiti artist David Choe, from homeless to millions
- Google TV announcements slated for Monday
- How to get the Diablo III beta test
- Google developing home entertainment system
- Ethical iPhone 5 petitions head to Apple stores
- Apple iPad 3 rumors, let's get real
- SOPA is dead, Smith pulls bill
- World Helium Supply Could Be Gone in 30 Years
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Syria's rebels "disillusioned" with America
- Search resumes at recycling center in Powell case
- Zambia celebrates as team wins African Cup
- Mickelson snags 40th PGA win at Pebble Beach
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News






