February 28, 2005 12:50 PM
- Text
Riskier Sex By HIV-Infected
- Adele's Grammy Comeback After Vocal Cord Surgery
- Treating Sleep Apnea in Kids Improves Behavior, Quality of Life
- Chemo May Not Harm Unborn Baby
- C-Sections Not Always Best for Small Babies
- CDC: Doctors Increasingly Prescribe Exercise
- Osteoporosis Medication Linked to Unusual Thigh Fractures
- More from WebMD »
AIDS graphic generic general (AP / CBS)
(WebMD)
Young Americans living with HIV are worse off — and having much more risky sex — since powerful AIDS drugs came along.
You might think that the drugs, known as highly active antiretroviral therapy or HAART, would make life better for HIV-infected youths. You might think that when teens learn they have the AIDS virus, they would be more careful about unsafe sex and substance abuse. But you would be wrong.
"Post-HAART youth living with HIV were more likely to engage in unprotected sex and substance abuse, to be more emotionally distressed, and to have lower quality of life than were pre-HAART youth living with HIV," UCLA researcher Marguerita Lightfoot, PhD, and colleagues report in the February issue of the American Journal of Health Behavior.
Lightfoot's team made an extraordinary effort to find young Americans living with HIV — and to get honest information from them. In Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, and Miami, they recruited young people aged 13 to 24 through social service agencies, medical clinics, street outreach, and community advertisements.
From 1994 to 1996 — before HAART became available — they recruited 349 youths. From 1999 to 2000, well after the 1997 advent of HAART, they recruited another 175 youths. All underwent standardized two-hour interviews. In both time periods, the average study participant was 21 years old.
Youths in the before-HAART era averaged about six sex partners, with whom they had unprotected sex 27 percent of the time. In the era after HAART became available, this number shot up to more than 10 sex partners and unprotected sex 42 percent of the time. The HAART-era youth also were twice as likely to report sex with an injection drug user.
Surprisingly, youths in the HAART era were sicker than the kids interviewed before HAART became available. They were twice as likely to have AIDS (21 percent vs. 10 percent) and significantly more likely to have had symptoms of HIV disease (49 percent vs. 39 percent).
"It is surprising that the post-HAART youth experienced more symptoms," Lightfoot says, in a news release. "This suggests that although they are being identified as HIV positive at a younger age, these youth are being identified later in the progression of disease. Therefore, it is also likely they were infected at a younger age."
Given these findings, it's not surprising that the HAART-era youth were two to three times more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, more likely to be clinically distressed, had worse coping skills, and were more likely to commit delinquent acts or spend time in jail.
Although three-fourths of the HAART-era youth had been prescribed HAART drugs, only about half were still taking the lifesaving drugs.
"Targeted interventions for youth living with HIV that address risk behaviors and aim to improve quality of life are needed now more than ever before," Lightfoot and colleagues conclude.
Sources: Lightfoot, M. American Journal of Health Behavior, February 2005; vol 29: pp 162-171. News release, Center for the Advancement of Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
By Daniel J. DeNoon
Reviewed by Michael W. Smith, MD
© 2005, WebMD Inc. All rights reserved
You might think that the drugs, known as highly active antiretroviral therapy or HAART, would make life better for HIV-infected youths. You might think that when teens learn they have the AIDS virus, they would be more careful about unsafe sex and substance abuse. But you would be wrong.
"Post-HAART youth living with HIV were more likely to engage in unprotected sex and substance abuse, to be more emotionally distressed, and to have lower quality of life than were pre-HAART youth living with HIV," UCLA researcher Marguerita Lightfoot, PhD, and colleagues report in the February issue of the American Journal of Health Behavior.
Lightfoot's team made an extraordinary effort to find young Americans living with HIV — and to get honest information from them. In Los Angeles, San Francisco, New York, and Miami, they recruited young people aged 13 to 24 through social service agencies, medical clinics, street outreach, and community advertisements.
From 1994 to 1996 — before HAART became available — they recruited 349 youths. From 1999 to 2000, well after the 1997 advent of HAART, they recruited another 175 youths. All underwent standardized two-hour interviews. In both time periods, the average study participant was 21 years old.
Youths in the before-HAART era averaged about six sex partners, with whom they had unprotected sex 27 percent of the time. In the era after HAART became available, this number shot up to more than 10 sex partners and unprotected sex 42 percent of the time. The HAART-era youth also were twice as likely to report sex with an injection drug user.
Surprisingly, youths in the HAART era were sicker than the kids interviewed before HAART became available. They were twice as likely to have AIDS (21 percent vs. 10 percent) and significantly more likely to have had symptoms of HIV disease (49 percent vs. 39 percent).
"It is surprising that the post-HAART youth experienced more symptoms," Lightfoot says, in a news release. "This suggests that although they are being identified as HIV positive at a younger age, these youth are being identified later in the progression of disease. Therefore, it is also likely they were infected at a younger age."
Given these findings, it's not surprising that the HAART-era youth were two to three times more likely to abuse drugs and alcohol, more likely to be clinically distressed, had worse coping skills, and were more likely to commit delinquent acts or spend time in jail.
Although three-fourths of the HAART-era youth had been prescribed HAART drugs, only about half were still taking the lifesaving drugs.
"Targeted interventions for youth living with HIV that address risk behaviors and aim to improve quality of life are needed now more than ever before," Lightfoot and colleagues conclude.
Sources: Lightfoot, M. American Journal of Health Behavior, February 2005; vol 29: pp 162-171. News release, Center for the Advancement of Health, University of California, Los Angeles.
By Daniel J. DeNoon
Reviewed by Michael W. Smith, MD
© 2005, WebMD Inc. All rights reserved
Popular Now in Health
- Cancer drug reverses Alzheimer's in mice: Study
- Marijuana-smoking motorists twice as likely to crash
- 4.5 million Americans over 50 have artificial knees
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- America's pets also have an obesity epidemic
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- John Dye Dies: What Killed "Angel" Star?
- America's sodium problem: Not from salty snacks?
- Let's Move! campaign turns 2 today: Is it working?
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
- Chinese mom gives birth to 15-pound baby
- Woman spotlights uterus didelphys on talk show
- Christina Hendricks: Too Big for Hollywood?
- 8 Tips For Losing Weight After Pregnancy
- Online dating downsides, romantic tattoo gone wrong: HealthPop Valentine's Day video
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Richardson hits nine 3s, Magic top Bucks 99-94
- Smith stops 38 shots, Coyotes top Blackhawks 3-0
- Whitney Houston's voice will never be forgotten
- Reactions to Whitney Houston's death
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






