February 11, 2009 7:50 PM
- Text
Arthritis Drug Vioxx Recalled
(CBS/AP)
Pharmaceutical giant Merck & Co. is pulling its blockbuster arthritis drug Vioxx from the market worldwide because new data from a clinical trial found an increased risk of heart attack and stroke.
Merck said Thursday that data from the trial showed the increased risk of heart attack and other cardiovascular complications began 18 months after patients started taking Vioxx.
The data comes from a three-year study aimed at showing that Vioxx at a 25 milligram dose prevents recurrence of polyps in the colon and rectum. The trial was stopped after Merck discovered the higher heart risk compared to patients taking dummy pills.
"We're taking this action because we believe it best serves the interest of patients," Ray V. Gilmartin, Merck's chairman, president and chief executive officer, said in a prepared statement.
"Although we believe it would have been possible to continue to market Vioxx with labeling that would incorporate these new data, given the availability of alternative therapies and the questions raised by the data, we concluded that a voluntary withdrawal is the responsible course to take," he said.
The Wall Street Journal reported last month that a study financed by the federal government has found that Vioxx may cause serious heart problems.
As a result, a large HMO, Kaiser Permanente, was reconsidering its use of the drug.
The study added to the mounting safety questions surrounding Vioxx, and is expected to boost its biggest rival, Pfizer's Celebrex.
CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports experts flagged a heart issue as far back as 1999, when Merck's own pre-trial study of Vioxx revealed significantly more heart attacks and strokes than a competitor.
"If I were sitting on the FDA what I think what I would do is really urge physicians not to use higher doses of this agent Vioxx, and really reconsider even using the lower doses," said Dr. Deepak L Bhatt, a Cleveland Clinic cardiologist.
Dr. David Graham, the lead FDA scientist on the government study, was so concerned, he told reporters: "I don't think doctors should prescribe high doses of Vioxx, and patients shouldn't take it."
The FDA last month told CBS News it planned no immediate action on Vioxx, and that heart risks are already mentioned on the drug's label.
Vioxx is one of Merck's most important drugs, with $2.5 billion in sales in 2003. But sales dipped 18 percent in the second quarter of this year to $653 million.
Merck said Thursday that data from the trial showed the increased risk of heart attack and other cardiovascular complications began 18 months after patients started taking Vioxx.
The data comes from a three-year study aimed at showing that Vioxx at a 25 milligram dose prevents recurrence of polyps in the colon and rectum. The trial was stopped after Merck discovered the higher heart risk compared to patients taking dummy pills.
"We're taking this action because we believe it best serves the interest of patients," Ray V. Gilmartin, Merck's chairman, president and chief executive officer, said in a prepared statement.
"Although we believe it would have been possible to continue to market Vioxx with labeling that would incorporate these new data, given the availability of alternative therapies and the questions raised by the data, we concluded that a voluntary withdrawal is the responsible course to take," he said.
The Wall Street Journal reported last month that a study financed by the federal government has found that Vioxx may cause serious heart problems.
As a result, a large HMO, Kaiser Permanente, was reconsidering its use of the drug.
The study added to the mounting safety questions surrounding Vioxx, and is expected to boost its biggest rival, Pfizer's Celebrex.
CBS News Correspondent Sharyl Attkisson reports experts flagged a heart issue as far back as 1999, when Merck's own pre-trial study of Vioxx revealed significantly more heart attacks and strokes than a competitor.
"If I were sitting on the FDA what I think what I would do is really urge physicians not to use higher doses of this agent Vioxx, and really reconsider even using the lower doses," said Dr. Deepak L Bhatt, a Cleveland Clinic cardiologist.
Dr. David Graham, the lead FDA scientist on the government study, was so concerned, he told reporters: "I don't think doctors should prescribe high doses of Vioxx, and patients shouldn't take it."
The FDA last month told CBS News it planned no immediate action on Vioxx, and that heart risks are already mentioned on the drug's label.
Vioxx is one of Merck's most important drugs, with $2.5 billion in sales in 2003. But sales dipped 18 percent in the second quarter of this year to $653 million.
Popular Now in Health
- America's sodium problem: Not from salty snacks?
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
- Chinese mom gives birth to 15-pound baby
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- Electric shocks to brain may boost memory: Study
- STD rates rise among elderly: Why?
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Scottish twins, 102, are world's oldest: Guinness
- Measles patient at Super Bowl prompts health alert
- America's pets also have an obesity epidemic
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- Drinking soda raises risk for asthma, COPD: Study
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- Dr. Liar? Study finds dishonest docs common
- Egg recall in 34 states over Listeria concerns
- College sells morning-after pill in vending machine
- McDonald's scraps "pink slime" from burgers
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Oscar lands in Los Angeles after Chicago flight
- Democrats renew push for campaign finance overhaul
- SKoreans visit jointly run factory park in NKorea
- Judge allows 2 claims in archdiocese bankruptcy
on Facebook
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- "Person to Person" with George Clooney
on CBS News






