February 11, 2009 7:51 PM
- Text
Dan Rather Statement On Memos
(CBS)
Below is the text of CBS News Anchor Dan Rather's statement on the documents purportedly written by President Bush's National Guard commander:
Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a "60 Minutes Wednesday" story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question-and their source-vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.
Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where-if I knew then what I know now-I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.
But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.
Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.
Last week, amid increasing questions about the authenticity of documents used in support of a "60 Minutes Wednesday" story about President Bush's time in the Texas Air National Guard, CBS News vowed to re-examine the documents in question-and their source-vigorously. And we promised that we would let the American public know what this examination turned up, whatever the outcome.
Now, after extensive additional interviews, I no longer have the confidence in these documents that would allow us to continue vouching for them journalistically. I find we have been misled on the key question of how our source for the documents came into possession of these papers. That, combined with some of the questions that have been raised in public and in the press, leads me to a point where-if I knew then what I know now-I would not have gone ahead with the story as it was aired, and I certainly would not have used the documents in question.
But we did use the documents. We made a mistake in judgment, and for that I am sorry. It was an error that was made, however, in good faith and in the spirit of trying to carry on a CBS News tradition of investigative reporting without fear or favoritism.
Please know that nothing is more important to us than people's trust in our ability and our commitment to report fairly and truthfully.
Popular Now in Politics
- CBS News: Romney wins Nevada
- Eastwood: No political spin to my Chrysler ad
- Was Chrysler's Super Bowl ad political?
- Hoekstra defends racially-charged Super Bowl ad
- Special Nevada caucus draws complaints
- Romney attacks Obama over "religious liberty"
- Dick Armey "feels bad" for Gingrich
- Obama sees negative campaign ahead
- How Romney won the Nevada caucuses
- Romney to Obama: "Not so fast"
- Romney ties Obama to Carter
- Romney team targets Santorum's conservative cred
- What Does 'GOP' Stand For?
- Komen denies partnership with gun retailer
- Poll: Obama edges Romney in hypothetical matchup
- Paul disputes latest jobs numbers
- Nevada entrance poll: Beating Obama matters most
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News
- Gov. Perry ventures back into Texas public eye
- Lawmakers' properties can benefit from earmarks
- Tim Tebow won't rule out a future in politics
- Earnings Preview: Use of cash in focus for News 2Q
on Facebook Most Discussed Stories
on CBS News



