WASHINGTON, July 14, 2004
NY Times Sued For Anthrax Columns
Steven Hatfill Says Newspaper Stories Ruined His Reputation
-
Dr. Steven J. Hatfill defended himself during a news conference outside his lawyers office Aug. 11, 2002, in Alexandria, Va. (AP)
-
Interactive Anthrax Follow the search for the anthrax attacker, learn about the bacteria's use as a bio-weapon and find out how you can get infected and what it does to your body.
-
Interactive Biological / Chemical Weapons Take a crash course in biological and chemical weapons. Get more info on everything from ricin to smallpox to VX gas.
-
Interactive Dark Days For Gray Lady Events and key players in the journalistic fraud scandal at the New York Times.
Steven J. Hatfill filed the lawsuit Tuesday in U.S. District Court in Alexandria, Va. He charged that a series of columns by Pulitzer Prize-winning columnist Nicholas Kristof was irresponsible by failing to seek, or rejecting, statements of denials from Hatfill.
In several columns in 2002, Kristof faulted the FBI for not actively investigating a scientist he identified as "Mr. Z." Descriptions of the "Mr. Z" were detailed enough that readers could recognize him as Hatfill and subsequent columns later identified him, the complaint states.
"It was inconsequential to defendant Kristof whether it turned out that his designated culprit was guilty or innocent, how reckless his allegations and insinuations were, or how injurious they were to his victim," the lawsuit alleges. "What was at issue ... was to help 'light a fire' under the federal investigators."
The lawsuit said the newspaper declined to print a letter to the editor and an op-ed article from Hatfill's lawyer, Victor Glasberg, that responded to the charges, according to the complaint.
A Times spokesman, Toby Usnik, said the lawsuit lacked merit. He noted that Hatfill had already been identified by government authorities as a "person of interest" by the time Kristof's columns ran.
"While encouraging the FBI to investigate the matter, Mr. Kristof was careful to note that Dr. Hatfill was presumed to be innocent," Usnik said. "We believe in a case like this, the law protects fair commentary on an important public issue."
Hatfill also has a lawsuit pending against Attorney General John Ashcroft and other government authorities who named him as a "person of interest." U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton in Washington is expected to rule soon on a government request to have that lawsuit dismissed.
İMMIV The Associated Press. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
The road ahead in Afghanistan, and the crucial decision Obama faces.
