February 11, 2009 8:41 PM
- Text
What Are Grandparents' Rights?
(CBS)
Bonnie Miller, who lost her husband Jeff last year, wants to start a new life with her new fiancé, but Rose and Ronald Miller, Jeff's parents, want her - and their grandfchild - to stay nearby.
The 32-year-old widow said she never intended to prevent her in-laws from seeing their grandson. But a year after her husband died of leukemia, it was time for her to start fresh.
She told The Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith she met her fiancé in August while chatting on the Internet. She never thought this was going to be an issue.
But a judge's temporary order on April 29, says she can't move more than 25 miles from the home she's already sold, at least until a June 4 hearing.
Talking about her in-laws, she said, "I think that he (her fiance) is part of the problem for them. He is a wonderful man. They state that they don't know him. That nobody knows him. I know him. He is wonderful to my son. My son has much love for this man. Everybody that has met my fiancé absolutely adores him."
The judge also gave the grandparents more time with their grandson than they previously had.
The paternal grandmother, Rose Miller, said to Smith that, though her daughter-in-law has a right to start a new life, her grandson Kevin has a life, too. "We're his only blood relatives, and I think that he has the right to grow up knowing us and knowing that we all love him," Rose Miller said.
After she and her husband were unable to get in touch with their grandson for a period of three weeks, she said, they filed a custody suit.
Bonnie Miller's response to that was, "The reason that contact was cut off is because the paternal grandmother would not stop smoking in her home - that my son has asthma. Then she was invited over to home to visit with her grandchild. The grandfather and the grandmother were invited to my home to visit with their grandchild. The paternal grandfather declined to come. The paternal grandmother came over to my home, visited for about 40 minutes then became belligerent with me, threatened to take my child from my home. The police had to be called."
Noting the conversation had started to sound like something between Dr. Phil and Judge Judy, Smith asked the grandparents' attorney Carol Hanna why she believes the grandparents could make Bonnie Miller and her son stay in Pittsburgh.
"Pennsylvania law permits grandchildren to remain in contact with their grandparents. Pennsylvania recognizes that even though parents may be starting a new life, that doesn't mean that the children have to lose their history and divorce their past," Hanna explained.
Bonnie Miller's attorney, Karen L. Ferri, said the grandparents don't have a leg to stand on legally.
"Section 5311 of the Pennsylvania statutes gives grandparents the right to seek partial custody. What they're trying to do is, we believe, impermissibly and unconstitutionally expand that right to prohibit relocation. If you look at the United States Supreme Court Law it says parents have a primary and basic right to the care, custody and control of a child. It's just an expansion way beyond what the legislators intended. There's no case law that supports what they're trying to do, Ferri said.
June is 4 is the hearing.
The 32-year-old widow said she never intended to prevent her in-laws from seeing their grandson. But a year after her husband died of leukemia, it was time for her to start fresh.
She told The Early Show co-anchor Harry Smith she met her fiancé in August while chatting on the Internet. She never thought this was going to be an issue.
But a judge's temporary order on April 29, says she can't move more than 25 miles from the home she's already sold, at least until a June 4 hearing.
Talking about her in-laws, she said, "I think that he (her fiance) is part of the problem for them. He is a wonderful man. They state that they don't know him. That nobody knows him. I know him. He is wonderful to my son. My son has much love for this man. Everybody that has met my fiancé absolutely adores him."
The judge also gave the grandparents more time with their grandson than they previously had.
The paternal grandmother, Rose Miller, said to Smith that, though her daughter-in-law has a right to start a new life, her grandson Kevin has a life, too. "We're his only blood relatives, and I think that he has the right to grow up knowing us and knowing that we all love him," Rose Miller said.
After she and her husband were unable to get in touch with their grandson for a period of three weeks, she said, they filed a custody suit.
Bonnie Miller's response to that was, "The reason that contact was cut off is because the paternal grandmother would not stop smoking in her home - that my son has asthma. Then she was invited over to home to visit with her grandchild. The grandfather and the grandmother were invited to my home to visit with their grandchild. The paternal grandfather declined to come. The paternal grandmother came over to my home, visited for about 40 minutes then became belligerent with me, threatened to take my child from my home. The police had to be called."
Noting the conversation had started to sound like something between Dr. Phil and Judge Judy, Smith asked the grandparents' attorney Carol Hanna why she believes the grandparents could make Bonnie Miller and her son stay in Pittsburgh.
"Pennsylvania law permits grandchildren to remain in contact with their grandparents. Pennsylvania recognizes that even though parents may be starting a new life, that doesn't mean that the children have to lose their history and divorce their past," Hanna explained.
Bonnie Miller's attorney, Karen L. Ferri, said the grandparents don't have a leg to stand on legally.
"Section 5311 of the Pennsylvania statutes gives grandparents the right to seek partial custody. What they're trying to do is, we believe, impermissibly and unconstitutionally expand that right to prohibit relocation. If you look at the United States Supreme Court Law it says parents have a primary and basic right to the care, custody and control of a child. It's just an expansion way beyond what the legislators intended. There's no case law that supports what they're trying to do, Ferri said.
June is 4 is the hearing.
Popular Now in CBS News
- Teen's Facebook Sex Scam
- The Best Pregnancy Tests
- Cyberbullying Continued After Teen's Death
- Eight Delicious Foods That Help Fight Belly Fat
- Which Yogurts Are Healthiest?
- Perks of Five-Hour Energy Put to Test
- How Long Foods Stay Fresh In Fridge
- "Designer Babies" Ethical?
- Ten Healthiest Fast Food Chains
- Could Protein Shakes Harm Your Health?
- Best Low-Tech Cell Phones Suitable for Seniors
- Best Sleep Positions To Rid Aches, Pains
- Can Exercise Make You Gain Weight?
- Electronic Cigarettes: Are They Safe?
- How to Stop a Cold Before It Takes Hold
- Countertop Makeover In A Paint Can
- Cooking Oils That Are Good For You
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Heather Mills says McCartney calls were hacked
- Oscar statues fly from Chicago to Los Angeles
- Oscar statues fly from Chicago to Los Angeles
- TV producer lands in Mexico to face murder charges
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Josh Powell had "incestuous" images on his home computer, authorities say
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
on CBS News





