February 11, 2009 8:48 PM
- Text
Army Probes Afghan Prisoners' Deaths
(CBS)
Military coroners have ruled as homicides the deaths in December of two prisoners at a U.S. base in Afghanistan, a military spokesman said.
A U.S. Army investigation of the deaths continues, said Col. Roger King, a spokesman for U.S. forces at the base in Bagram, Afghanistan.
The two prisoners died last Dec. 3 and Dec. 10 at the makeshift prison in the U.S. compound at the Afghan base north of Kabul. The autopsies that labeled the deaths as homicides found that the men had been beaten, and one had a blood clot in his lung, King said.
American forces are holding an unknown number of prisoners at Bagram. A Pakistani official has said the prisoners include Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the top al Qaeda leader captured over the weekend in Pakistan.
A human rights group called in December for an independent investigation of allegations of torture at Bagram.
U.S. officials insist they eschew physical, violent torture. But rights groups claim that prisoners at Bagram are subjected to other methods of influence, including covering prisoner's eyes or faces, forcing them to stand or sit in uncomfortable positions and sleep deprivation.
"We don't sanction torture but there are psychological and other ways that we can get most of what we need," Sen. Jay Rockefeller, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said after Mohammed's arrest.
The detention of prisoners at Bagram and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has itself drawn scorn from rights advocates, who assert that the United States has contravened international law by failing to charge them with crimes or release them — as typically occurs with prisoners of war once hostilities cease.
U.S. plans to hold military tribunals for some detainees have also been criticized. Tribunals would be closed to the public and provide fewer rights to the accused.
The Bush administration contends that the "war on terrorism" is not over: that with thousands of American troops still in the country, hunting pockets of al Qaeda and Taliban remnants, hostilities have not ceased.
The administration contends tribunals are necessary to protect evidence with national security implications.
A U.S. Army investigation of the deaths continues, said Col. Roger King, a spokesman for U.S. forces at the base in Bagram, Afghanistan.
The two prisoners died last Dec. 3 and Dec. 10 at the makeshift prison in the U.S. compound at the Afghan base north of Kabul. The autopsies that labeled the deaths as homicides found that the men had been beaten, and one had a blood clot in his lung, King said.
American forces are holding an unknown number of prisoners at Bagram. A Pakistani official has said the prisoners include Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, the top al Qaeda leader captured over the weekend in Pakistan.
A human rights group called in December for an independent investigation of allegations of torture at Bagram.
U.S. officials insist they eschew physical, violent torture. But rights groups claim that prisoners at Bagram are subjected to other methods of influence, including covering prisoner's eyes or faces, forcing them to stand or sit in uncomfortable positions and sleep deprivation.
"We don't sanction torture but there are psychological and other ways that we can get most of what we need," Sen. Jay Rockefeller, vice chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, said after Mohammed's arrest.
The detention of prisoners at Bagram and Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, has itself drawn scorn from rights advocates, who assert that the United States has contravened international law by failing to charge them with crimes or release them — as typically occurs with prisoners of war once hostilities cease.
U.S. plans to hold military tribunals for some detainees have also been criticized. Tribunals would be closed to the public and provide fewer rights to the accused.
The Bush administration contends that the "war on terrorism" is not over: that with thousands of American troops still in the country, hunting pockets of al Qaeda and Taliban remnants, hostilities have not ceased.
The administration contends tribunals are necessary to protect evidence with national security implications.
Popular Now in CBSNews.com
- Texas woman gives birth to 16-lb., 1-oz. boy
- Americans Are Obsessed with Fast Food: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal
- CBS News.com On Your Phone
- The Science Of Sleep
- EgyptAir 990 Passenger List
- CBS Evening News
- 60 Minutes Archive
- Local Weather
- Who Killed Alexander Litvinenko?
- France: Less Work, More Time Off
- School Cell Phone Ban Causes Uproar
- Bullying: Do Schools Need a New Approach?
- CBS News On Twitter
- On Elephant Sanctuary, Unlikely Friends
- States Urged To Raise The Driving Age
- Hello, New Hillary And Old McCain
- What Really Happened At Columbine?
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Advocates want no weakening of Ind. smoking ban
- Money fund assets fall to $2.657 trillion
- A look at economic developments around the globe
- Key developments in Intel's antitrust tangles
on Facebook
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- Tenn. father charged with murdering couple who"unfriended" daughter on Facebook
- Mo. teen gets life in prison for murder of 9-year-old girl
- "American Idol": Jim Carrey's daughter out, and then disaster
on CBS News





