February 11, 2009 8:55 PM
- Text
Where's That Food From?
(AP)
A new system of labeling food so consumers can see in which country it was grown and processed could cost farmers and the food industry an estimated $2 billion, according to the Agriculture Department.
The estimate was published Nov. 21 in the Federal Register. The government is seeking public comment on ways to minimize the cost of the program.
The Food Marketing Institute said Monday that the program is expensive for farmers and manufacturers who have to keep records so meat, fish and other products can be labeled with their country of origin. The institute warned consumers' wallets will get hit as the food industry tries to offset the costs.
"Much of the burden will fall ultimately on consumers in higher costs for the hundreds of products that must be labeled in this program," said Tim Hammonds, president and CEO of the institute, an organization of retailers and wholesalers.
The government issued guidelines in October for the food industry to mark products with their country of origin - a system set up by the farm bill approved in May. The program is voluntary for two years but will become mandatory.
The guidelines allow retailers to mark designated goods as products of the United States if they meet certain standards. For meat such as beef, it means the animals must be born, raised and slaughtered in this country.
Food products of mixed origin would carry labels noting the separate countries, according to the guidelines.
Hammonds said the system is confusing for consumers because some food is raised and slaughtered or processed in different countries. Some beef, for example, is born in the United States, raised in Canada and slaughtered by U.S. packers.
Farm groups such as the American Farm Bureau Federation favored the labeling program because it would allow consumers to distinguish U.S.-made food from products made by competitors.
The Nebraska-based farm group, Organization for Competitive Markets, said the program's benefits will outweigh the costs.
"Producers will now have the opportunity to showcase U.S.-produced products which are produced and processed under the most demanding food safety system in the world," the group's president, Fred Stokes, said in a statement Monday.
By Emily Gersema
The estimate was published Nov. 21 in the Federal Register. The government is seeking public comment on ways to minimize the cost of the program.
The Food Marketing Institute said Monday that the program is expensive for farmers and manufacturers who have to keep records so meat, fish and other products can be labeled with their country of origin. The institute warned consumers' wallets will get hit as the food industry tries to offset the costs.
"Much of the burden will fall ultimately on consumers in higher costs for the hundreds of products that must be labeled in this program," said Tim Hammonds, president and CEO of the institute, an organization of retailers and wholesalers.
The government issued guidelines in October for the food industry to mark products with their country of origin - a system set up by the farm bill approved in May. The program is voluntary for two years but will become mandatory.
The guidelines allow retailers to mark designated goods as products of the United States if they meet certain standards. For meat such as beef, it means the animals must be born, raised and slaughtered in this country.
Food products of mixed origin would carry labels noting the separate countries, according to the guidelines.
Hammonds said the system is confusing for consumers because some food is raised and slaughtered or processed in different countries. Some beef, for example, is born in the United States, raised in Canada and slaughtered by U.S. packers.
Farm groups such as the American Farm Bureau Federation favored the labeling program because it would allow consumers to distinguish U.S.-made food from products made by competitors.
The Nebraska-based farm group, Organization for Competitive Markets, said the program's benefits will outweigh the costs.
"Producers will now have the opportunity to showcase U.S.-produced products which are produced and processed under the most demanding food safety system in the world," the group's president, Fred Stokes, said in a statement Monday.
By Emily Gersema
Popular Now in SciTech
- Apple iPad 3 rumors: thicker, sharper, coming soon
- Tesla's Model X: Finally, an electric car we all want
- Retro Duo will play your old Nintendo games
- iPad 3 mini on the way, says analyst
- Apple iPad 3 rumors resurface, sources say March release
- Apple iPhone 5 rumors, reports say June release
- Obama's 2012 campaign playlist now on Spotify
- Happy 50th to computer game Spacewar
- Google developing home entertainment system
- Apple faces $1.6 billion iPad trademark lawsuit
- Facebook graffiti artist David Choe, from homeless to millions
- FBI releases Steve Jobs background report
- Facebook required for Spotify account, here's a trick
- Apple iPad 3 rumors, let's get real
- Ethical iPhone 5 petitions head to Apple stores
- Hackers release Symantec pcAnywhere source code
- Shocking Stats on Texting While Driving
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Whitney Houston, superstar of records, films, dies
- Fashion Week trends: Military looks and drama
- AP NewsAlert
- 'Phantom of the Opera' marking 10,000 shows in NYC
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






