February 11, 2009 8:56 PM
- Text
A Political Aptitude Test
(CBS)
A weekly commentary by CBS News correspondent Andy Rooney.
No one but the candidates really paid much attention to the elections this year. Fewer than 40 percent of eligible Americans voted. There's something wrong with that, and I have an idea: Forget voting.
Make everyone running for office take a written test. Never mind the political speeches. Students take SATs - Scholastic Aptitude Tests to get into college. Every candidate would take a PAT - a Political Aptitude Test to get into office.
It would test them on their knowledge of the issues and on their intelligence. The candidate who got the highest score on the test would win.
Voters have been getting turned off lately because there are a lot of things wrong with our elections. To begin with, the average voter doesn't pick the candidates. We get them handed to us by professional politicians. In the primary election, we choose between several candidates we didn't pick. That's wrong.
This year 98 percent of the candidates already in the House of Representatives were re-elected. They won because they can do favors for people and for businesses who give them money. That's wrong. Unknown challengers don't have anything to offer.
In New York State, three candidates spent $140 million trying to get to be governor. You wonder what's in it for them. One business tycoon spent $65 million of his own money trying to buy the election. That's wrong.
The President didn't go into work 56 times this year because he was out making speeches for Republicans. He raised $140 million for them. Wrong. Not what we elected him to do.
It's not a party matter. President Clinton did the same thing in 2000.
We don't really know what the candidates believe and if we gave them a test, maybe we'd find out. They hate to answer YES or NO to anything so this Political Aptitude Test would have maybe 50 YES or NO questions.
I put down just a few sample questions.
Someone asked me who would mark the tests and give the politicians their score.
Well, I'll do that.
Written By ANDY ROONEY
No one but the candidates really paid much attention to the elections this year. Fewer than 40 percent of eligible Americans voted. There's something wrong with that, and I have an idea: Forget voting.
Make everyone running for office take a written test. Never mind the political speeches. Students take SATs - Scholastic Aptitude Tests to get into college. Every candidate would take a PAT - a Political Aptitude Test to get into office.
It would test them on their knowledge of the issues and on their intelligence. The candidate who got the highest score on the test would win.
Voters have been getting turned off lately because there are a lot of things wrong with our elections. To begin with, the average voter doesn't pick the candidates. We get them handed to us by professional politicians. In the primary election, we choose between several candidates we didn't pick. That's wrong.
This year 98 percent of the candidates already in the House of Representatives were re-elected. They won because they can do favors for people and for businesses who give them money. That's wrong. Unknown challengers don't have anything to offer.
In New York State, three candidates spent $140 million trying to get to be governor. You wonder what's in it for them. One business tycoon spent $65 million of his own money trying to buy the election. That's wrong.
The President didn't go into work 56 times this year because he was out making speeches for Republicans. He raised $140 million for them. Wrong. Not what we elected him to do.
It's not a party matter. President Clinton did the same thing in 2000.
We don't really know what the candidates believe and if we gave them a test, maybe we'd find out. They hate to answer YES or NO to anything so this Political Aptitude Test would have maybe 50 YES or NO questions.
I put down just a few sample questions.
- If you thought it was necessary, would you raise taxes?
- Should we attack Iraq?
- Should there be prayer in schools to God or Allah?
- Should we spend less on education and more on the military?
- Should we spend less on the military and more on education?
Someone asked me who would mark the tests and give the politicians their score.
Well, I'll do that.
Written By ANDY ROONEY
Popular Now in 60 Minutes
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Adele opens up about vocal cord surgery
- What will Adele's voice sound like at the Grammys?
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Adele on her body image
- "60 Minutes" Presents: Three Remarkable Women
- The Pope and his Jewish maestro
- Helen Mirren talks nudity and her career
- Can hunting endangered animals save the species?
- The Debate On Lowering The Drinking Age
- Katharine Hepburn at her best
- Meryl's men: How does she feel about her co-stars?
- Preview: India's Gold
- Lara Logan breaks silence on Cairo assault
- Classic Morley Safer interviews on "60 Minutes"
- Defense Secretary, NFL Commissioner, Big Game Hunting
- Jake: Math prodigy proud of his autism
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Egypt's military rulers warn of conspiracies
- Israel successfully tests missile defense system
- Egypt bars British woman from leaving country
- Blasts hit security HQs in Syrian city Aleppo
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
on CBS News






