February 11, 2009 9:01 PM
- Text
Suit Vs. Wal-Mart Made Class Action
(CBS)
A federal judge has granted class-action status to a lawsuit that claims Wal-Mart's denial of health insurance coverage for birth control is unfair to female employees.
U.S. District Judge Julie Carnes said Friday that all women working for the nation's largest retailer after March 2001 could pursue claims against the company if they were using prescription contraceptives.
Lisa Smith Mauldin, a customer-service manager at a Wal-Mart store in Hiram, filed the lawsuit in October asking the court to declare the company's health plan illegal and to order Wal-Mart to reimburse her and other employees for uninsured prescription contraceptives.
Her lawyer, George Stein, called the judge's decision to grant class-action status "a major victory for the working women of America."
"A lot of working women in this country are single and have children and have to pinch their pennies to make ends meet," he said. He said the company saves about $5 million a month by denying birth control coverage.
Wal-Mart attorney Mark Casciari noted that the judge had yet to address the merits of the lawsuit and had declined to include male Wal-Mart employees whose spouses use birth control.
"For that reason, I don't see this as a major victory for anybody," Casciari told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
The company is reviewing the ruling and hasn't decided whether to appeal, Wal-Mart spokesman Bill Wertz said Saturday.
U.S. District Judge Julie Carnes said Friday that all women working for the nation's largest retailer after March 2001 could pursue claims against the company if they were using prescription contraceptives.
Lisa Smith Mauldin, a customer-service manager at a Wal-Mart store in Hiram, filed the lawsuit in October asking the court to declare the company's health plan illegal and to order Wal-Mart to reimburse her and other employees for uninsured prescription contraceptives.
Her lawyer, George Stein, called the judge's decision to grant class-action status "a major victory for the working women of America."
"A lot of working women in this country are single and have children and have to pinch their pennies to make ends meet," he said. He said the company saves about $5 million a month by denying birth control coverage.
Wal-Mart attorney Mark Casciari noted that the judge had yet to address the merits of the lawsuit and had declined to include male Wal-Mart employees whose spouses use birth control.
"For that reason, I don't see this as a major victory for anybody," Casciari told The Atlanta Journal-Constitution.
The company is reviewing the ruling and hasn't decided whether to appeal, Wal-Mart spokesman Bill Wertz said Saturday.
Popular Now in Health
- Cancer drug reverses Alzheimer's in mice: Study
- Marijuana-smoking motorists twice as likely to crash
- 4.5 million Americans over 50 have artificial knees
- Skin cancer self-exam: What to look for (PHOTOS)
- Norovirus outbreak hits Rider University in N.J
- America's pets also have an obesity epidemic
- Things You Didn't Know About Your Penis
- America's sodium problem: Not from salty snacks?
- PICTURES: 15 Shocking Sexual Fetishes
- Caffeine inhalers - the next club drug?
- Let's Move! campaign turns 2 today: Is it working?
- Chinese mom gives birth to 15-pound baby
- John Dye Dies: What Killed "Angel" Star?
- Woman spotlights uterus didelphys on talk show
- Christina Hendricks: Too Big for Hollywood?
- 8 Tips For Losing Weight After Pregnancy
- Measles patient at Super Bowl prompts health alert
Latest CBS News Headlines
on Facebook
on CBS News
- Holliday leads 76ers past short-handed Cavs 99-84
- Nuggets upend Pacers 113-109
- Griffin, Paul lead Clippers over Bobcats 111-86
- Whitney Houston died in Beverly Hills hotel room
on Facebook
- Adele sings a cappella for Anderson Cooper
- Occupy protestors kicked out of CPAC
- CPAC: Will Sarah Palin spring a surprise?
- Beyonce and Jay-Z post first photos of Blue Ivy Carter
on CBS News






