All Blog Posts from Public Eye

Read all 'Post' posts in Public Eye

December 6, 2007 3:35 PM

Helen Thomas Bah-Humbugs Bloggers

(CBS)
The other day I kicked the tires of a theory espoused by a freelance journalist from up in Boston. He was suggesting that anybody – whether blogger or “citizen journalist” or YouTube uploader – should be considered a ‘journalist’ if they do something that “genuinely looks like journalism.”

More important than labeling, in the author’s mind, was the thought that these ‘genuine-seeming journalists’ should be afforded the legal protections granted to accredited media members.

Well, not that it should come as too much of a surprise, but old school White House scribe Helen Thomas isn’t drinking that “everybody’s a journalist!” kool-aid.

Read full post…

Tags:
Helen Thomas ,
Huffington Post
Topics:
4th Estate Debate
December 5, 2007 11:37 AM

Front Page Falsehoods

(AP)
Welcome to the snowglobe that is Washington, DC this morning.

(Yes, those of you playing “Holiday News Bingo,” feel free to block off the center top square.)

And one of the minor little media flurries we’re mucking through? A dubious Washington Post front page story last week entitled “Foes Use Obama's Muslim Ties to Fuel Rumors About Him.”

According to to The Politico the piece has become a huge point of contention:
The Washington Post is accustomed to criticism of its coverage from the right and left blogospheres, but a Nov. 29 front page story about Barack Obama’s rumored Muslim ties came with a twist: Many voices within its own newsroom joined in the firestorm…

Since Thursday, there have been angry e-mails, Hamilton said, and allegations that the Post is swift-boating the Illinois senator by discussing rumors at length, without mentioning whether they’ve been thoroughly discredited by other media.
The Columbia Journalism Review folks jumped in as well:
In the front-page piece, [author Perry] Bacon muses over how the chances of Barack Obama getting elected president might be affected by the fact that he’s not Muslim. Seriously. To build his case, Bacon stumbles artlessly through all manner of rumor, innuendo, and xenophobic smear—never bothering to refute any of it, even though there is plenty of well-documented evidence to knock down much of this stuff.

Read full post…

Tags:
Barack Obama ,
Perry Bacon ,
Washington Post ,
Howard Kurtz
Topics:
4th Estate Debate
October 29, 2007 12:32 PM

Ombudsmania!

(CBS/AP)
What’s more meta than a blog about blogs and funner than a barrel of monkeys? An ombudsman column roundup of other ombudsmen’s columns, of course!

Today, Public Eye continues its semi-regular look at the issues at play in Print MediaLand -- at least the ones that seem worth passing along. (As sometimes these things get too insider-y even for us.) So keep your hands inside the car at all times, and we’re off:

Heads or Tales:

Quick. Tell me what’s going on in Iraq in six words. Or explain the Red Sox sweep in five. Go ahead and try.

Both Deborah Howell at the Washington Post and David House at the Fort Worth Star-Telegram used their columns to talk about how difficult it is to boil down journalism into short, pithy, attention-grabbing headlines. Here’s Howell’s take:
As a former copy editor, I know it's tough work, especially on a tight deadline and in a tight count. As Vince Rinehart, Editorial copy desk chief, said: "Perhaps the greatest challenge in copy editing is reading 1,000 sophisticated words on a complex topic and finding six words to tell the story and convey its nuance and tone, often with less than five minutes to do so."
And House describes it this way:
Headline content often relies on connect-the-dots skills in which editors and readers assume shared knowledge and anticipate exchanges of information. As Lutz noted, "Often a headline writer is asked to convey one or more themes in a story in 3, 4, or 5 words."

That can be a mind-bending task, particularly when a copy editor is bearing in mind the Star-Telegram's mission ("Earning the people's trust daily") while dealing with supersensitive topics such as illegal immigration -- a complex, emotionally charged issue that permeates our nation's mind and pulls high readership, increasing the need for accuracy.

Read full post…

Tags:
Ombudsman ,
Kansas City Star ,
Washington Post ,
Chicago Tribune
Topics:
Across The Media Universe
October 16, 2007 12:32 PM

General Attack, Specific Focus

(AP Photo)
It was the verbal shot heard ‘round the world on Saturday morning, echoing long into the Sunday morning talk shows: Former US Commander Calls Iraq a "Nightmare."

Lt. General Ricardo Sanchez – the top military commander in Iraq from 2004-2006, who resigned after Abu Ghraib – pulled no punches in his speech to the Military Reporters and Editors conference Friday.

The New York Times coverage led off:
In a sweeping indictment of the four-year effort in Iraq, the former top commander of American forces there called the Bush administration’s handling of the war “incompetent” and said the result was “a nightmare with no end in sight.”

Lt. Gen. Ricardo S. Sanchez, who retired in 2006 after being replaced in Iraq after the Abu Ghraib prisoner abuse scandal, blamed the Bush administration for a “catastrophically flawed, unrealistically optimistic war plan” and denounced the current addition of American forces as a “desperate” move that would not achieve long-term stability.

Read full post…

Tags:
Ricardo Sanchez ,
New York Times ,
Washington Post ,
AP ,
BBC.
Topics:
In The News
September 19, 2007 4:29 PM

Fact Checking in Washington

By this point, I guess you can tell I'm ever-so-fixated on how journalists can improve the accuracy of their work and clean up political discourse.

Whether it's the Associated Press editor pushing for "accountability journalism" or that NPR segment from last week where they discussed how debunking misinformation merely solidifies the incorrect perception most of the time, the newsmedia implicitly has admitted they need to get more careful.

Today's well-intentioned journalistic initiative to make the campaign trail less cluttered?

The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" story
section, with the following goal:
The purpose of this website, and an accompanying column in the Post, is to "truth squad" the national political debate in the period leading up to the 2008 presidential election. Our goal is to shed as much light as possible on controversial claims and counter-claims involving important national issues, such as the war in Iraq, immigration, health care, social issues, the economy, and the records of the various presidential candidates. When we come across a statement or claim that is at variance with the facts, as best we can establish them, we will point that out.
While it's clear they're taking their job very seriously, they still keep it readable with features like "The Pinocchio Test" where they score misstatements or exaggerations on a scale of one to four Pinocchios. (And reward fully truthful statements with the mark of "Geppetto.")

And, unsurprisingly, I'm a fan. Sort of. So far, it looks as if they're getting the hang of things by picking on some political low-hanging fruit.

Read full post…

Tags:
Washington Post ,
fact checker ,
Hillary Clinton ,
Barack Obama
Topics:
In The News
September 19, 2007 4:29 PM

Fact Checking Fixation

(AP)
By this point, you can probably infer I'm ever-so-fixated on how journalists can improve the accuracy of their work and clean up political discourse.

Whether it's that Associated Press editor pushing for "accountability journalism" or that NPR segment from last week where they discussed how debunking misinformation merely solidifies the incorrect perception most of the time, the newsmedia is acknowledging they need to get more careful.


Today's well-intentioned journalistic initiative to make the campaign trail less cluttered?

The Washington Post's "Fact Checker" story
section, with the following goal:
The purpose of this website, and an accompanying column in the Post, is to "truth squad" the national political debate in the period leading up to the 2008 presidential election. Our goal is to shed as much light as possible on controversial claims and counter-claims involving important national issues, such as the war in Iraq, immigration, health care, social issues, the economy, and the records of the various presidential candidates. When we come across a statement or claim that is at variance with the facts, as best we can establish them, we will point that out.
While it's clear they're taking their job very seriously, they still keep it readable with features like "The Pinocchio Test" where they score misstatements or exaggerations on a scale of one to four Pinocchios. (And reward fully truthful statements with the mark of "Geppetto.")

And, unsurprisingly, I'm a fan. Sort of. So far, it looks as if they're getting the hang of things by picking on some political low-hanging fruit.

Read full post…

Tags:
Washington Post ,
fact checker ,
Hillary Clinton ,
Barack Obama
Topics:
In The News
September 11, 2007 1:52 PM

Myth-Busting Mistake

(CBS/The Early Show)
Down with fact checkers!

Well no, not really. But still … sort of. Fact checking in the media may be doing more harm than good, it turns out.

A lot is made by this writer and other media types who presume to take the side of Truth and Light and, ahem, "Set the Record Straight" and fact check when it comes to misperceptions in the media. We're the irritating (but well-meaning) souls who spout out lines like "… but it turns out shark attacks aren't up but down in Florida this summer."

But it turns out we're a little off on that.

According to an interview from this past weekend's NPR "On the Media" it seems that every time a reporter takes the time to bring up something in order to correct it, the mere recitation of the original flawed fact only serves to reinforce it, even if your entire point was to debunk it. As the interview began:
Bob Garfield: Americans may or may not be as sleep-deprived as drug makers claim, but if it were a myth you could try to quash it with the truth. That's what the Centers for Disease Control Prevention recently did. They sent out a flyer listing various facts and myths about the flu vaccine and labeled them "true or false." But a study at the University of Michigan found that the CDC flyer actually did nothing to change people's minds and may have even spread vaccine myths to more people.

Shankar Vedantam, a reporter for The Washington Post, explains that right after reading the flyer, people mostly remembered the false statements as false.

Shankar Vedantam: But about 30 minutes later, older people started to remember some of the false statements as true, and three days later, very large numbers of older people and significant numbers of younger people also started remembering increasing numbers of myths as true.

The true statements did not suffer the same kind of deterioration with time. In other words, over time we tend to remember false things as true but not true things as false.

Read full post…

Tags:
Vedantam ,
Washington Post ,
Bob Garfield ,
On the Media
Topics:
Media Issues
September 11, 2007 1:25 PM

Myth Making ...

Down with fact checkers!

Well no, not really. But still … sort of. Fact-checking in the media may be doing more harm than good, it turns out.

A lot is made by this writer and other media types who presume to take the side of Truth and Light and, ahem, "Set The Record Straight" and fact-check when it comes to misperceptions in the media. We're the irritating (but well-meaning) souls who spout out lines like "… but it turns out shark attacks aren't up but down in Florida this summer."

But it turns out we're a little off on that.
According to an interview from this past weekend's NPR "On the Media" it seems that every time a reporter takes the time to bring up something to correct it, the mere recitation of the original flawed fact only serves to reinforce it, even if your entire point was to debunk it. As the interview began:
Bob Garfield: Americans may or may not be as sleep-deprived as drug makers claim, but if it were a myth you could try to quash it with the truth. That's what the Centers for Disease Control Prevention recently did. They sent out a flyer listing various facts and myths about the flu vaccine and labeled them "true or false." But a study at the University of Michigan found that the CDC flyer actually did nothing to change people's minds and may have even spread vaccine myths to more people.
Shankar Vedantam, a reporter for The Washington Post, explains that right after reading the flyer, people mostly remembered the false statements as false.

Shankar Vedantam: But about 30 minutes later, older people started to remember some of the false statements as true, and three days later, very large numbers of older people and significant numbers of younger people also started remembering increasing numbers of myths as true.
The true statements did not suffer the same kind of deterioration with time. In other words, over time we tend to remember false things as true but not true things as false.

Read full post…

Tags:
Vedantam ,
Washington Post ,
Bob Garfield ,
On the Media
Topics:
Media Issues
August 28, 2007 10:47 AM

<i>Post</i> Radio Pulled. Why?

(CBS)
You ever get sick of radio because it’s too shrill or too ideological? Or you’re not quite the NPR type?

Well, bad news. A highly-publicized attempt at breaking out of that mold is going under.

The grand experiment of Washington Post Radio (WTWP) – dubbed “NPR with caffeine” at its outset – has failed. According to the Post’s Paul Farhi:
Washington Post Radio, which brought the newspaper's journalists to the local airwaves, will go off the air next month after failing to attract enough listeners and losing money during its 17-month existence.
Washington Post columnist Marc Fisher weighed in early this morning on the “difficult marriage of two very different news cultures,” offering why he thought the station never fulfilled its potential:

  • Radio requires different skills. Skills that most print reporters don’t have. (Just as print demands different skills of its practitioners.)
  • The station’s slogan “There’s always more to the story” suggested that listeners could expect more, but focus groups sponsored by a rival NPR station found that listeners weren’t getting more. (Full disclosure: That NPR station is WAMU, where I frequently guest-host. But then again, I was a frequent guest on WTWP, so make of that what you will.)
  • When the initial format didn’t work, the station went for quicker hits on “a more populist and lowbrow selection of stories.”

    Read full post…

  • Tags:
    Washington Post Radio ,
    Marc Fisher ,
    Paul Farhi
    Topics:
    In The News
    August 21, 2007 12:42 PM

    Botched Blog-Bashing

    (AP/HO)
    Elon Professor Micheal Skube skewered bloggers Sunday in an op-ed column published in the Los Angeles Times entitled “Blogs: All The Noise That Fits.” And in doing so, he invoked the name and words of the eminent cultural critic Christopher Lasch to support his thesis. Wrote Skube:
    "What democracy requires," Lasch wrote in "The Lost Art of Argument," "is vigorous public debate, not information. Of course, it needs information too, but the kind of information it needs can only be generated by debate. We do not know what we need until we ask the right questions, and we can identify the right questions only by subjecting our own ideas about the world to the test of public controversy.”

    There was something appealing about this argument -- one that no blogger would reject -- when Lasch advanced it almost two decades ago. But now we have the opportunity to witness it in practice, thanks to the blogosphere, and the results are less than satisfying. One gets the uneasy sense that the blogosphere is a potpourri of opinion and little more. The opinions are occasionally informed, often tiresomely cranky and never in doubt. Skepticism, restraint, a willingness to suspect judgment and to put oneself in the background -- these would not seem to be a blogger's trademarks.

    But they are, more often than not, trademarks of the kind of journalism that makes a difference.
    So what Skube is trying to say is that bloggers are cheapening public debate – in the Laschian sense – because they are too opinionated, unrestrained and self-righteous. Now, it’s not as if I’m Will Hunting and Lasch is Vickers’ “Work in Essex County,” but Skube is guilty of a little bit of selective quoting when it comes to Mr. Lasch.

    Read full post…

    Tags:
    Christopher Lasch ,
    Michael Skube ,
    Talking Points Memo ,
    Huffington Post
    Topics:
    4th Estate Debate

    About Public Eye

    Description for Public Eye