The My Lai Comparison

(AP)
The My Lai comparison has been invoked quite a bit in recent days. "My Lai on the Euphrates?," asked the Guardian Unlimited. "Massacre in Iraq just like My Lai" said the Daily Telegraph. In the New York Times, Maureen Dowd called Haditha a "My Lai acid flashback." There are many more such examples.
But is the comparison legitimate? The My Lai massacre, as it has come to be known, refers to the killing of hundreds of Vietnamese civilians by U.S. soldiers on March 16, 1968, during the Vietnam War. What began as a "search and destroy" mission ended with the massacre of more than 300 apparently unarmed residents of My Lai, among them women, children, babies, and the elderly. Some were reportedly tortured and raped. The incident, notes PBS, "sent shockwaves through the U.S. political establishment, the military's chain of command, and an already divided American public."
There are some obvious similarities here, should the allegations in Haditha bear out, chief among them the fact that both incidents involved the massacre of apparently mostly unarmed innocents by an occupying U.S. military force. There is also the fact that both involved an apparent cover-up of the facts, and both are the types of incidents that can have a serious impact on public opinion, both in America and abroad.
There are also differences. For one, even if the worst of the allegations are true, this was not a massacre on the scale of My Lai. That does not lessen the horror, but it should also not go ignored.
Author Thomas Friedman on Obama's Afghanistan plan and the war on terror.