On the Hustings Vs. On the Job

(CBS)
(My fave? Tulis’ The Rhetorical Presidency, closely followed by Neustadt’s Presidential Power.)
Turns out the argument over ‘what makes a good president’ is as old as the country itself. And that debate continued on this week, with ABC’s Mark Halperin writing in the Sunday New York Times that he was rethinking whether good campaigners made for good presidents, prompting CBS News White House Correspondent Mark Knoller – in one of his irregularly scheduled dispatches – to write in to Public Eye, basically asking Halperin ‘What took you so long?’
I was surprised to read the Op-Ed piece in Sunday New York Times by Mark Halperin.
Over the years, we both covered the White House and presidential campaigns when he worked as a producer and political director at ABC News. Now, he’s editor-at-large and senior political analyst at Time Magazine. I know him to be an astute and incisive political observer.
He now writes that his long-time view of presidential campaigns as predictors of leadership in office is wrong.
“For most of my time covering presidential elections, I shared the view that there was a direct correlation between the skills needed to be a great candidate and a great president,” wrote Halperin.
Frankly, I can’t believe he ever felt that way. It has always seemed self-evident that the best campaigners are not necessarily the best Presidents.






Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more.