Picking The New White House Press Secretary

(AP)
But it's worth looking closely at Dickerson's other suggestions. He claims that "[t]he new press secretary needs not only to be in the room when the decisions are being made, but he needs to be empowered to talk about what he's seen." In theory that's great – transparency is our guiding principal, after all – and there's certainly something to giving the press secretary enough access so that he or she knows, for example, when Scooter's not telling him the truth. But it would be political suicide for any White House to empower a press secretary to offer too much candor about "what he's seen."
Let's turn it around – does the press corps offer up its own secrets so readily? Does it tell the government the identities of the anonymous sources it sometimes relies on or reporters' personal feelings about the people they cover? Of course not, because journalists have reason to keep some secrets. The same goes for the government. The government may sometimes overreach in defining what it can justifiably keep secret – a tendency that the journalists are empowered to try to correct – but it would be foolish to simply throw the doors open and expose every mistake or instance of internal strife. If Dickerson simply wants more candor, I'm with him. But an all access pass? The press corps might want to take a good long look in the mirror before making such a request.