All Blog Posts from Public Eye

GOOOAAAAL! There you have it, my complete depth of knowledge about World Cup Soccer, or any soccer really. Apparently I missed class the day they taught Franklin Foer’s ground-breaking theory of “How Soccer Explains The World.” Fortunately, we all get a make-up chance courtesy of Foer’s new blog. What good is being the editor of an intellectually high-brow magazine like The New Republic if you can’t use its Web site to blog about World Cup Soccer. Foer explains:

What will this blog cover? Whatever the hell interests us--the political economy of Mexican soccer, Argentina's porous defense, Michael Essien's dirty tackles, Lionel Messi's paunch. The participants include intellectuals, a great American film director, foreign correspondents, a Mexico soccer journalist, and a humorist. I hope that it's an alchemy that yields unique takes, or at least delightfully madcap conversation.

Having already solved such vexing issues like Iraq’s economy, the “porous” U.S.-Mexican border, al Qaeda’s “dirty tricks” and, well, Dick Cheney’s “paunch,” there simply isn’t anything left but to put this massive amount of brainpower to the task of analyzing the World Cup. Maybe I’m being too rough on soccer aficionados. After all, they say soccer is the most popular sport in the world. Just one question though: How many Rhodes Scholars does it really take to figure out that Brazil is likely to win it all?

Read full post…

In the New Republic, Franklin Foer has a warning for left-wing bloggers who seek to take down the MSM. Foer says they’re playing right into the hands of the right-wing bloggers (tip of the hat to Romenesko). Read the entire piece, it should stoke the debate:

“There's another reason that liberals shouldn't be so quick to help conservatives crush old media. Because of the right's alliance with business, it simply has more resources to shovel at its institutions--and it has been doing exactly that for the last 40 years. And, unlike liberals, conservatives have already proved themselves masters of partisan media, where they reduce their political program into highly saleable, entertaining populism. If the battle of ideas doesn't have credible, neutral arbiters like the so-called MSM--and liberals jump into an ideological shoving match with bigger, badder, conservative outlets--there's no question which side will prevail.”

Read full post…