Last Updated Dec 2, 2010 10:23 AM EST
An FCC proposal to institute a form of net neutrality already faces political assault. Whether the plan moves into effect or is scuttled by a Republican House majority only changes the cause of the pain for tech corporations. They will find that new strategy is necessary as we undergo significant reshaping of how business is done on the Internet.
FCC chairman's wish listYesterday, FCC Chairman Julius Genachowski circulated a set of draft net neutrality rules to the other agency commissioners. They include:
- Broadband providers would have to tell consumers and businesses how they manage their networks.
- Consumers and businesses have a right to send and receive lawful traffic, so broadband providers could not block content, apps, services, or the connection of devices.
- No public or private entity could unreasonably discriminate in transmitting traffic so as not to effectively decide which businesses would win or lose.
- Broadband providers would have flexibility to manage their networks and to implement usage-based pricing, something that they've wanted for years.
- For now, it would be hands off wireless broadband other than requirements for transparency and a no-traffic-blocking rule.
Net neutrality? DOABut the chance of this going through is iffy. The remaining four commissioners are split -- the Democrats are for it and the Republicans are against, with Robert McDowell calling it "highly interventionist" and Attwell Baker urging a halt to any progress until the new Congress has had time to address the issue.
Yup, good luck with that. Contenders to become chairman of the House Commerce and Energy Committee, which has oversight on these issues, oppose the suggested rules and the way Genachowski wants to adopt them. The talking point mantra, reflected in statements both by House Republican Whip Eric Cantor and McDowell, is that the FCC has looked only at "bad" (Internet regulation) and "worse" (reclassifying broadband as regulated telecommunications services) options.
Of course, the fact that high tech often favors Democrats, while telecommunications typically leans towards Republications, has no influence in the situation.
Tech screwed either wayAt this point, you might also call bad or worse the likely options for high tech. If Genachowski has his way, consumers will end up paying more, and that will make them more conscious about usage and likely cause them to scale back. That's bad. Worse would be groups in Congress blocking net neutrality. Such a move would make carriers into king makers with the power to advance some companies over others, depending on what they were willing to pay. The sums would likely be chicken feed for a large business like Google and prohibitive for start-ups. On the one hand, we'll see consumers pull back. On the other, innovation gets bruised. Either way, it would require some significant strategic rethinking by many companies.
- Why Net Neutrality Means Consumers Should Pay More -- but Won't
- Net Neutrality? Good Luck After These Elections
- FCC Loses Broadband Authority, But May Get the Last Laugh
- Networks Versus Google TV -- Just Another Name for Net Neutrality
- Congress Punts Net Neutrality back to the FCC. Get Ready for Carrier Reclassification
- Bye-bye, Mobile Internet: Verizon, AT&T, Others Hold Secret Net Neutrality Talks
- Google and Verizon Want To Emasculate the FCC