Crimesider
November 6, 2009 11:30 AM

Jeremy Aikman and Porn Star Wife Janine Lindemulder Battle Sandra Bullock for Custody of Kids

(MySpace Photo)
Photo: Jeremy Aikman and Janine Lindemulder.

NEW YORK (CBS/AP) Sandra Bullock has some concerns not only over her husband's porn star ex-wife Janine Lindemulder, but of Lindemulder's new lover, ex-con Jeremy Aikman.

PICTURES: Sandra Bullock vs. Porn Star

According to ABC News, court records show Aikman has a record of "several convictions involving alcohol, guns and manufacture of narcotics."

(MySpace Photo)
Photo: Janine Lindemulder.
PICTURES: Sandra Bullock vs. Porn Star

Bullock and husband Jesse James are fighting Lindemulder in court for custody of James' and Lindemulder's five-year-old girl.

James has had sole guardianship of the child since Lindemulder, an adult film star and director, was jailed for tax evasion.

Federal prosecutors on August 22, 2008 said Lindemulder, 39, of Huntington Beach, Calif., failed to pay more than $200,000 in taxes owed to the Internal Revenue Service.

(AP Photo/Jeff Christensen)
Photo: Sandra Bullock on MTV in 2006.
PICTURES: Sandra Bullock vs. Porn Star

She served six months behind bars and was recently released.

Now she wants her daughter back and went on Good Morning America Tuesday to make her case. "What would give her the right to take away my daughter?" Lindemulder asked. "I am the best mother I can be."

But Lindemulder also admitted, "I absolutely have made horrific choices in the past."

According to court papers filed by James, those choices include "allowing the child around pornographers, drug addicts, guns and firearms, felons and other unsafe environments."

Lindemulder's new man, Aiken,

PICTURES: Sandra Bullock vs. Porn Star

MORE ON CRIMESIDER
November 4, 2009 - Sandra Bullock Custody Battle (Photos) with Porn Star Janine Lindemulder
October 29, 2009 - Sandra Bullock Battles Porn Star Janine Lindemulder for Child Custody

Tags:
sandra bullock ,
janine lindemulder ,
jeremy aikman ,
jesse james ,
porn star ,
custody battle ,
crimesider
Topics:
Daily Blotter
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 25 Comments
by tonlo November 22, 2009 2:46 PM EST
I remember hearing about Janine's arrest a while back for assaulting Jesse James & she was on a show with him where she was throwing things and acting strange. In my opinion not paying taxes is not a reason to lose custody, but a violent past & allowing a criminal around your child is different. Sandra Bullock should not even be mentioned. It should be about the welfare of the child not their step mother's fame or $. Janine said she made bad choices, well she could fix that by not dating ex con's.
Reply to this comment
by missme4 November 9, 2009 11:01 AM EST
These people are nothing more than white trailer trash. This is Jerry Springer content. Of course, it reflects the mentality of the typical american. That is why it is considered news worthy here.
Reply to this comment
by sonofsummarex November 9, 2009 4:09 AM EST
It's unbelievable that this woman could lose her kid because she got on the wrong side of the IRS.
Reply to this comment
by missme4 November 9, 2009 10:59 AM EST
No it isn't
by sheryl1946 November 9, 2009 1:09 AM EST
Just in case you live in a crystal house, and have no idea what this world really is about,you need to grow up a tad bit more,before You start casting stones!!!

Anyone that walks around our world with 3 legs, will never have enough blood flow to make it up to their brain! I admire Jesse and Sandra for standing up and keeping the fight going! For the childrens sake they are doing exactly what "they" believe, is in the best interest of the Child! That's what normal adult do....they put the childs mental and physical health above even themselves...That is LOVE!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Some of you might be well served to get a lil help yourselves!! Ellen and stryker, I get the felling that you both have done U R share of whoring around in your lifetime! No compassion for the child at all!!
IF I remember my scripture correctly:
He who is without sin..let him throw the first stone!
Reply to this comment
by duskay13 November 8, 2009 5:47 PM EST
Lindemulder says, she's the best mother that she can be. Are you kidding? Please...let Jesse have full custody. Then you would be the best mother.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 November 8, 2009 6:25 PM EST
Lindemulder and her new guy are just looking for money from Bullock. They do not want the child, (she would just be in the way, and people would be watching to catch them doing something wrong (so they could sell the story)
Extortion, pure and simple.....
by ibsteve2u November 8, 2009 5:02 PM EST
This sad situation totally distracts me from my disappointment over the fact that Sandra Bullock is unavailable.

(Thought I'd inject a little self-centered fantasy.)
Reply to this comment
by confused2byu November 8, 2009 1:15 PM EST
Jeremy Aikman and Porn Star Wife Janine Lindemulder Battle Sandra Bullock for Custody of Kids....I'm a little confused. Aren't the porn star and Jesse James battle ling for custody? Isn't Sandra Bullock only guilty by association? Jesse James already has custody but I guess Sandra Bullock's name get more attention. If the court felt it was necessary to give Jesse James sole custody I don't see where the porn star has much of a legal fight. Guess that is why she is using Sandra Bullock?s name to get her noticed and sympathy. For the record I don't feel sorry for you and think the kid should stay with her father; who just happens to be married to Sandra Bullock.
Reply to this comment
by l0nd0n3 November 8, 2009 3:40 PM EST
Why is she "Entitled" to child support?
by sean66x November 8, 2009 12:52 PM EST
Janine is entitled to a modest child support payment and part time with the child. Morality is not a relevant issue. Sunny should know both parents.
Reply to this comment
by barcar55 November 8, 2009 5:11 PM EST
Entitled to child support?? For what? She is not the legal guardian and does not have custody of the child. Any judge with good sense would only allow supervised visits.
by skeezix06 November 8, 2009 7:53 PM EST
Morality IS a relevant issue. It may not be the only issue but it is definitely relevant. Sunny should have as little contact with her mother as possible. She didn't take care of Sunny when she had her. She was a porn star. Apparently her husband has a criminal record and the large number of tattoos all over her arms and back make me wonder if she has other issues as well. The child belongs with her father and stepmother if she is to have any chance at a normal life. Janine needs stop thinking about herself, start thinking about what's best for Sunny, and Janine needs to let go.
by DawnBroderick40 November 8, 2009 8:42 AM EST
I would be so ashamed to have such a dirty, diseased woman for a "mother". Her filthy, piece of trash, felonious boyfriend should stay away from that little girl. That poor little girl brought into this world by these people.
Reply to this comment
by ToolMangler1 November 8, 2009 6:17 PM EST
Sorry,to say this missy, If you had been raised under those circumstances, you wouldn't think anything was wrong with it.
by o_nolan1 November 8, 2009 2:40 AM EST
Sandra Bullock should be very worried about involving herself with a man who has had very questionable judgement in the past. Bad judgement never goes away, it just rears it's ugly head when you least expect it.
Reply to this comment
by Gin99G November 7, 2009 10:42 PM EST
I think the child's long term safety both physical and emotional well being should be the deciding factor. What parent doesn't want the best for their child. I say bravo! to Sandra Bullock and hubby.
Reply to this comment
by sheryl1946 November 9, 2009 12:27 AM EST
I my friend am with you 100%!!!! Jesse and Sandra have been called white trash(see below.).........by someone who to me, makes hasty decisions...........then let's the mouth RUN before putting brain in gearit's seems has not a moral ONE! Stupid is..as stupid does!
by mejordelahistoria November 7, 2009 9:04 PM EST
this why jessee james, and bullock are considered white trash.
Reply to this comment
by stryker54 November 8, 2009 12:20 AM EST
Think they would be better parents than an excon and porn star. I can imagine the company they keep. Good roll models for a kid.
by fdx22 November 6, 2009 7:58 PM EST
If she only paid her taxes. Stupid girl. Her daughter would have had a stable family life.
Reply to this comment
by bpai99 November 6, 2009 3:16 PM EST
This has Lifetime Channel movie treatment written all over it.
Reply to this comment
by ellensmithee November 6, 2009 2:31 PM EST
What the heck was Jesse James thinking marrying and having a child with a porn star?

Why do guys want to sleep with women who have slept with every scumball in town??

I pity the child who has a wh#re for a mother and an idiot for a father.
Reply to this comment
by stryker54 November 8, 2009 12:18 AM EST
She gives good head and is a **** in the bedroom. Other than that who would want her?
by rebekah_s24 November 6, 2009 1:41 PM EST
Janine Lindemulder is worried about what kind of woman is raising her daughter?? Lindemulder's boyfriend is an ex-con that has tatoos all over his body including his head. She should be worried about growing up herself and surrounding herself with people that would be good for her. Oh wait what am I talking about? She's a porn star. The ideal parent for a child.
Reply to this comment
See all 25 Comments

Crimesider Topics

Crimesider is the ultimate destination for true-crime fans: riveting crimes, exclusive 911 calls, police interrogations, expert forensics, and more. It's in our DNA. Now it's in yours.

BOOK 'EM

Book 'Em: It Happens Every Day

Inside the World of a Sex Crimes D.A.

Photos
Scroll Left Scroll Right