Coop's Corner
October 30, 2009 3:32 PM

File Sharing's Mysteries Again Stump Uncle Sam

The accidental disclosure of a House ethics investigation has kicked up quite a fuss on Capitol Hill as it turns out that more than 30 congressman and aides are under investigation. But after committee chairman, Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), disclosed the breach on the House floor late Thursday, her colleague, Rep. Jo Bonner (Ala.), who is the committee's ranking Republican, spoke next, telling fellow members that the breach was an isolated incident.

Not exactly.

In February, a company that monitors P2P networks said that it had found blueprints and avionics about the president’s helicopter, Marine One, on a computer in Tehran. An investigation later found that a third-party defense contractor with access to that data was using a computer that also had P2P file sharing software on its hard drive.

Peer-to-peer file sharing lets people transmit data over a network without the need for a central server. Peer-to-peer, or P2P as it's more generally known, first earned wide public attention in the late 1990s with the emergence of Napster and the practice of illegal file sharing of music over the Internet.

In this case, the breach occurred because a junior staffer saved the document on her home PC, which reportedly also had Gnutella file sharing software. One congressional source familiar with the inquiry says that she saved the document on her home PC but failed to realize the folder could be shared with other users on the P2P network.

Following Lofgren's announcement, she and Bonner issued a brief statement that underscored the depth of the challenge Congress may face keeping its secrets under wraps in the future. "No matter how robust our cybersecurity systems are, they remain subject to individual error."

Lofgren, who represents Silicon Valley, knows this stuff and she's quite right to note how hard it is to maintain a failsafe system. Even in the corporate world, where billions of dollars in spending on security software, everything comes to naught if a single employee ignores best practices memo and simply spaces out - which often happens.

"The problem is that whatever your policies are, human errors will always be your Trojan Horse," said a Congressional source. "You're talking about human error."

Which is why we'll likely be writing more stories like this in the future.

It's unclear who would be in charge of setting up best practices for the House of Representatives. Vivek Kundra is the Federal Chief Information Office. But because the federal CIO is in the executive branch, he has no jurisdiction or responsibility for legislative branch information technology policies or management. (If you have any idea, send me an email at charles.cooper@cbs.com.)

Tags:
coop's corner ,
charles cooper ,
p2p
Topics:
In The News
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by Ms_enza October 31, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
Whadya know, the savior of democracy may very well turn out to be the Microsoft Windows OS.
Reply to this comment
by Void_Master October 31, 2009 8:56 AM EDT
With Gnutella you assign what folders get shared and which ones don't. That is how ALL P2P software works. This genius must have installed the program then allowed it to "share" her entire hard drive. Then she was permitted (by the government, no less) to save classified documents on that same hard drive. What is most frightening of all is that this individual was allowed access to classified materials in the first place.

No wonder there are blueprints to Marine One in Tehran.
Reply to this comment
by 1notrub11 October 31, 2009 9:24 AM EDT
Void_Master - I could not agree more. I do not consider myself highly proficient in software handling, but even I could have figured this one out. If I can keep my business and personal files separated, certainly someone entrusted with classified materials should be able to do so.
by nojoy01 October 31, 2009 9:51 AM EDT
by Void_Master October 31, 2009 8:56 AM EDT

"Then she was permitted (by the government, no less) to save classified documents on that same hard drive."
------------------------------------------------------------------------
I would almost be willing to bet that the "junior staffer" was not "permitted" to download the classified documents to her home PC. Very likely she downloaded & saved the material IN VIOLATION of departmental rules/regulations concerning the handling of classified material. In short, some junior staffer thought that 1. The rules didn't apply to her. or 2. The rules were getting in the way of doing her job. or 3. She just didn't think. This only goes to prove the saying that "you can't schedule stupidity". And, trying to legislate against stupidity merely brings to light even more incredibly stupid ways to behave. :)
by AOCGUY November 5, 2009 12:41 PM EST
nojoy is correct that it is highly unlikely that the USG authorized sensitive data to be loaded on a personal computer. At the same time don't mistake sensitive for classified. They are two differnet things. The information was more than likley proprietary data that neither the USG nor the company would want leaked. Had it been classified data it would either have to be maintained on a USG owned and controlled computer system or on a contractor site under control of the USG. In either case the employee violated any number of security rules and regulations.
by bobnjersey October 30, 2009 7:04 PM EDT
["The problem is that whatever your policies are, human errors will always be your Trojan Horse," said a Congressional source. "You're talking about human error." ]

no you're not.

technology is a scam ... promises to increase productivity ... assurances of security. it's all about getting you to buy the next thing ... each time the new thing is the solution to all your problems ... replacing the last 'inadequate' thing you're now using. of course ... that inadequate thing was the thing the very same people sold you two years ago.

license agreements that absolve the vendors of any and all liability ... directly or indirectly as a result of the use of their product. new products that promise one thing ... and rarely deliver.

it's right behind the advertising and financial industries ability to sell you something ... it be a complete 'bust' ... and it's an 'oh well' scenario.
Reply to this comment

About Coop's Corner

Still searching for a no baloney point of view to put the daily stream of news headlines into their proper context? You've come to the right place.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR