Crimesider
July 28, 2009 10:48 AM

Dad Threw Daughter Off Cliff to Avoid Child Support, Says Prosecutor

(AP Photo/Daily Breeze)
LOS Angeles (AP) A father who had no interest in his 4-year-old daughter did the unimaginable - hurling her off a 120-foot cliff to avoid paying child support, a prosecutor said Monday during the man's murder retrial.

Cameron Brown, 47, was charged with one count of murder and the special circumstance allegations of murder while lying in wait and murder for financial gain in the death of Lauren Sarene Key in November 2000. Brown, a former American Airlines baggage handler, has pleaded not guilty and faces life in prison without parole if convicted.

Deputy District Attorney Craig Hum said during his opening statement that Brown killed Lauren because he didn't want to pay about $1,000 a month in child support.

Defense attorney Pat Harris countered that it was an accident when the girl fell from Inspiration Point in Rancho Palos Verdes.

Hum portrayed Brown as an uncaring father who tried to shirk his parental responsibility at nearly every turn. After Brown learned the girl's mother, Sarah Key-Marer, was pregnant with Lauren, he first wanted her to have an abortion and then sought a paternity test that eventually proved he was the father, Hum said.

"Does he show any interest in the child he fathered?" Hum asked. "Absolutely not."

Only when he was forced to pay child support did Brown finally see his daughter - about three years after she was born, Hum said, adding that the total number of hours Brown spent with his daughter during her life amounted to about two weeks.

Hum argued that Brown and Lauren went out to the cliff where nobody could see them, and he "hurled" her into the Pacific Ocean.

"This man picked up Lauren, whom he fathered but was never a father to, and threw her off a cliff into the water below," Hum said.

Brown, wearing a dark suit and a red tie, stared at Hum during his opening statement and showed no reaction.

Harris gave a different account of his client's relationship with his daughter, insisting the case was nothing more than "character assassination." He dismissed the prosecution's contention that it was a "good-versus-evil" struggle between Brown and Key-Marer.

"It was two parents trying to work out arrangements so they could have a happy child," Harris said.

Harris said Brown carried a picture of Lauren in his wallet, gave her gifts and toasted with his friends when he learned he would get visitation rights. Two weeks before her death, Brown filed court documents seeking more visits with Lauren, Harris said.

"It doesn't make sense," he said.

The prosecution's first witness was Key-Marer, a British immigrant, who described her relationship with Brown as amicable but deteriorated during the child custody dispute after she said in court documents that he was showing little interest in Lauren's life.

Key-Marer testified that her daughter wouldn't share what she did with Brown and said on the day she died, the child was upset once she learned Brown would pick her up at school.

"She said, 'No, no I don't want to see him today,'" Key-Marer said. "She was crying and I had trouble getting her out of the car seat."

In a wrenching moment, Key-Marer said after talking to her daughter on the phone she decided to leave work early and pick up Lauren. But she soon learned that Brown had arrived early and she wouldn't be able to get there in time.

She described waiting for Lauren that night, looking out her window for her daughter and Brown to return. Distraught, she and her husband decided to notify authorities because they thought Brown may have kidnapped Lauren.

"We knew something really bad had happened," she said.

Key-Marer broke into tears when she recounted how a female police detective told her that her daughter had died.

"I remember hearing the words 'cliff' and 'Lauren was dead,'" Key-Marer said before court recessed for the day. "I just couldn't believe it."

Brown was tried three years ago, but a mistrial was declared after a jury deadlocked on the severity of the crime. Some jurors favored a first-degree murder conviction, while others voted for second-degree murder or manslaughter.

Both sides intend to call experts to give their opinions on how Lauren died. Jurors will also take a trip to the cliff to see where the alleged crime occurred.



Tags:
Lauren Key ,
Los Angeles ,
Crimesider ,
Murder ,
Child Support ,
Cameron Brown ,
Craig Hum ,
Pat Harris ,
Sarah Key-Marer
Topics:
Daily Blotter
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 21 Comments
by jmarer August 25, 2009 5:26 PM EDT
God bless you sis<3


thinking of you... sometimes i wonder what youd be like today... Your in Gods hands now.. keep watching over us...love you sis.
Reply to this comment
by jokr8790 July 31, 2009 5:34 PM EDT
Ok-no the jury was not deadlocked over the sentence. Sentencing is up to the judge except in death penalty cases. They were deadlocked over the degree of homicide. The prosecution obviously had problems with proving intent. The guy does everything he can to disavow his daughter and then takes her to a dangerous place like Inspiration Point. There's no explanation as to how this "accident" happened. The prosecution should go over the forensics, for instance, if there were no footprints of her sliding off, or any of his trying to help her, that would go a long way towards proving that he pushed her or threw her. If that's the case, then it was premeditated, first degree murder and he should get life without parole, preferably being the girlfriend of every prison inmate who wants to take a whack at him. This guy reminds me of the guy in Indiana who injected his son with aids so he could avoid paying child support.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq July 28, 2009 9:16 PM EDT
Has he even denied it?
Reply to this comment
by jt92202 July 28, 2009 7:25 PM EDT
There are a lot of people that need to get to know who they are sleeping with before they have children and maybe the problems of child support would go away. Just because the woman says she's on Birth Control doesn't means she is!

Child support is to bring the child up not keep the mother in shoes but some people do not understand that the check that the mother is receiving from the father is paying her back for the expenses that she has already paid out. Don't get me wrong I do feel that the court system has failed our families but who else figures this stuff out? The mother, she'll take you for everything you have (anger towards the Father)! The father, I have seen so many fathers that wouldn't pay a dime even if they had too because they aren't giving anything to the mother (anger towards the Mother)! Who ends up getting hurt? The kids!! If it cost X amount to raise a kid then X divided by 1/2 is what each parent should pay! Keeping them in the lap of luxury should not be the courts choice but the parents choice as long as that child has what he/she needs that is all the parent should pay for UNLESS they want to give more! Both parents made them both parents are responsible for them, equally! I know in a perfect world! Back to the first paragraph, know who you are sleeping with before you sleep with them! If your married to them then that doesn't work but if your just messing around with them it's kinda your fault!!!

All most kids need is LOVE and SECURITY (along with the basics food, water shelter...), we teach our children they need 200.00 shoes and brand new cars when they get their license. We need to start teaching our children what is important and that is NOT material things! Teach them Responsiblity and maybe they won't get caught up in this mess themselves!!!!
Reply to this comment
by babooph July 28, 2009 6:19 PM EDT
Very glad I am not a jurist-he sounds guilty as hell without any proof,other than the state saying he is a bad person.
Reply to this comment
by roghil July 28, 2009 5:58 PM EDT
rdupuy11, AMEN!

After having been through this system I can tell you that a father can't feel like a father. I spent as much time as I could with my daughter. I went to all her school and scout functions. I was never late to pick her up when I had her. It was all about child support. My ex and I had agreed to alternate weeks until her lawyer "advised" her how much money she would get in child support with the standard every other weekend schedule. Suddenly, she didn't think alternating weeks was right. Of course the judge agreed.

Women are mercenaries. They go where the money is and the child's welfare be damned.
Reply to this comment
by rdupuy11 July 28, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
Most father's are correct in assuming that the role the court has envisioned for them, is a token role only.

1 weekend every two weeks, is a token role. If you are ordered into this situation, you have been forcibly separated from your family, by the government.

It is now illegal for you to be a true father. Any attempt to become a true father, will be labelled as 'kidnapping'. Because you cannot get equal time. You cannot expect equal financial duties.

You cannot teach your children anything about gender equality -- because it doesn't exist.

This system was imagined decades ago, in a very different time, and it has never been updated, and the people who support it, unfortunately, are not unlike the people who supported slavery years ago...they have their petty reasons for wanting to hold on, but they are not honorable, they are selfish, and completely uncaring about human dignity.

I think this guy, is at least guilty of failing to protect his child, and should go to jail.

But this tragedy....and it is a real tragedy, is nothing compared to the 100,000's of families forcibly broken up by the courts, and that lead to a parent, forced out of their children's life, over and over again, by an uncaring government, and selfish people who feel entitled.

Everyday, 1000's of times per day tragedy, that can never be forgotten, is the child support system. It's a crime against children, its a crime against parents...and obviously, somewhere deep in your heart you must know its a crime...because you assume it even drives people to murder, and can't even contemplate this news story today, in other terms.

That says a whole lot about you and your values.
Reply to this comment
by idcabouturproblems July 28, 2009 3:37 PM EDT
What a sick mother f*****.
Reply to this comment
by rdupuy11 July 28, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
Completely innocent of murder, but not negligence.

We assume he's guilty because child support exists.
It's our feelings about child support that are really shining through here.

I'm tired of cases with zero evidence going to court, and innocent people being convicted over tragedies.

He is guilty of being negligent in terms of protecting his daughter and keeping her safe from this accident. Anything further is wild eyed guessing.

It's time to end money transactions as part of post divorce parenting. Both parents should provide support to the child, not one paying, and the other receiving money.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq July 28, 2009 9:28 PM EDT
by rdupuy11 July 28, 2009 3:35 PM EDT
Completely innocent of murder, but not negligence.


---------

AND HOW ON EARTH DO YOU KNOW THAT???????

You ALSO have no evidence, so you are drawing conclusions in the VERY SAME WAY as those whom you claim or prejudiced "against fathers".

Cant you see that?

That is hypocrisy!
by differnet July 29, 2009 12:30 PM EDT
No, we assume he's guilty because one jury already heard the evidence and found him guilty. They deadlocked over the severity of the sentence.
by Vinsmom July 28, 2009 3:00 PM EDT
He pushed for abortion, did a dna test, didn't have anything to do with the little girl for the first three years of her life??? It wouldn't be a hard decision for me to assume he got rid of her to keep from paying child support. He's a detriment to society. I say tie a rather large, heavy object around his pathetic neck and toss him off a cliff. Eye for an eye is what these kinds of creeps need.
Reply to this comment
by mswolfestock July 28, 2009 2:56 PM EDT
That dumb, evil *S*O*N* *O*F* *A* *B*I*T*C*H* should have used birth control if he didn't want a kid. I mean, a box of Trojans costs, what -- less than $20 (?)

Maybe they can have him neutered in prison before they kill him.
Reply to this comment
by rdupuy11 July 28, 2009 3:40 PM EDT
mswolfestock, that is a completely ignorant comment. Most father's wanted their children, and believe, mistakenly, in equality of gender.

They are shocked to discover a few years later, that the Mother takes complete control of the entire upbringing of the child, and on top of that crime, takes a salary to boot.

I recommend to any Father, that they learn to not care so much, because caring will only bring a world of pain, and no additional input into the childs life.

The courts are NOT about bringing families to gether, but about tearing them apart.

NOT about keeping a father in a child's life, but keeping him out.

Even this article mentions their first fear was 'kidnapping' -- which is code word for the Father taking the child for an equal amount of time --- which is illegal in most cases, because the Courts order father's into the role of mere 'visitors' with 'visitation rights'.

Stop turning the world upside down.
by jcbc123 July 28, 2009 6:05 PM EDT
rdupuy11,

There is no equality of gender. If you believe, even mistakenly, you are a fool. As for your comments:

>They are shocked to discover a few years later, that the Mother takes complete control of the entire upbringing of the child, and on top of that crime, takes a salary to boot.

<True

>I recommend to any Father, that they learn to not care so much, because caring will only bring a world of pain, and no additional input into the childs life.

<That is the worst advice that I have ever heard. I recommend that you care, continue to care, and never give up caring. You push for additional input, push for more time with your children, and never give up! If nothing else, when the kids are grown, they will come to understand that you were there -- doing everything in your power to have a place in their lives.

>The courts are NOT about bringing families to gether, but about tearing them apart.

<Absolutely true.
NOT about keeping a father in a child's life, but keeping him out.

>Even this article mentions their first fear was 'kidnapping' -- which is code word for the Father taking the child for an equal amount of time --- which is illegal in most cases, because the Courts order father's into the role of mere 'visitors' with 'visitation rights'.

<I'd rather have visitation rights than no rights. Working within the system is the best way to prevail. Bucking the system rarely proves fruitful or successful.

>Stop turning the world upside down.

<Don't know how to respond to this statement.
by legacyabq July 28, 2009 9:25 PM EDT
You guys?

He has already been convicted.

12 people heard the evidence, and found him guilty.

Do you have evidence to the contrary?

Maybe you should call the police then and tell them.

OTHERWISE, GET OFF YOUR SOAPBOX.

SHAME ON YOU FOR USING THIS TO DECRY YOUR MYSOGENY AND POLITICK.
by horse3farm July 28, 2009 1:27 PM EDT
The jerk filed papers 2 weeks ahead of time to throw everyone off track and make it look like he cared. Yep, throw him off the Grand Canyon. Sicko.
Reply to this comment
by bigreddog222 July 28, 2009 2:26 PM EDT
I personally would like to knock that smug look on his face off. He is nothing but a P O S.
by DSW358 July 28, 2009 1:26 PM EDT
This is where the expression, "hell on earth" comes from... such evil; there is not punishment enough. Poor little girl, imagine her fear... and confusion, being hurt by one of two people she loved most in the world... I cannot fathom it.
Reply to this comment
by legacyabq July 28, 2009 9:21 PM EDT
Me too. Unfathomable.

This little girl has the same name as my very own precious daughter.

How does one live in a world with such evil in it?

I read this, and I thought of that scared girl falling, falling, screaming; terrified.

I read this an Lo, I wept I wept

I hopeit was an accident.

I hardly want to live knowing my fellow man, my fellow father, can do such unspeakable evil.
by bigreddog222 July 28, 2009 1:24 PM EDT
Throw his arse off a cliff. Grand Canyon maybe?
Reply to this comment
See all 21 Comments

Crimesider Topics

Crimesider is the ultimate destination for true-crime fans: riveting crimes, exclusive 911 calls, police interrogations, expert forensics, and more. It's in our DNA. Now it's in yours.

BOOK 'EM

Book 'Em: Mommy's Little Girl -- Casey Anthony and her Daughter Caylee's Tragic Fate

Diane Fanning Goes Behind the Headlines to Provide a Heartbreaking Account of a Case That Shocked the Nation

Photos
Scroll Left Scroll Right