Crimesider
July 20, 2009 8:22 AM

Will O.J. Go Free? Nevada Court Hears Rare Appeal

( (AP Photo/Myung J. Chun))
O.J. Simpson in victory after the jury acquitted him in the murders of Nicole Brown Simpson and Ronald Goldman in 1995. Will he win again at a rare hearing for bond while appealing his verdict?

LAS VEGAS (AP) Few in Nevada legal circles believe O.J. Simpson has any real chance at freedom when the state's Supreme Court justices consider letting him trade a prison cell in rural northern Nevada for a golf course in Miami while he appeals his conviction in a gunpoint hotel room heist.

What really has them abuzz is that Nevada's only appellate court agreed to schedule oral arguments Aug. 3 to hear Simpson's plea to be allowed to post bond.

“It's unusual. This is a situation where the Nevada Supreme Court might be accused of politics or being star-struck,” said Michael Green, a state history author and professor at the College of Southern Nevada in Las Vegas. “But this is also a case where they'd want to make sure all the i's are dotted and the t's are crossed.”

The Nevada Supreme Court received 1,842 appeals in fiscal 2008, and can take two years to decide cases, court spokesman Bill Gang said. Excluding motions by inmates acting as their own lawyers, the court hasn't received more than five requests for bail pending appeal in any year since 2000, Gang said.

Only one inmate, Paul Thomas Picetti, gained release in 2007 on a written request pending his appeal of a felony drunken driving conviction.

Not once the last eight years has the court held oral arguments.

But no Nevada prison inmate is as high-profile as the NFL Hall-of-Famer, television star and celebrity criminal defendant acquitted in the 1994 slaying of his ex-wife, Nicole Brown Simpson, and her friend, Ron Goldman, in Los Angeles.

It's been more than 30 years since the state high court granted a high-profile defendant freedom pending appeal. That man, Lawrence Arvey, skipped town.

“That hurt us all,” said William Terry, a veteran Las Vegas defense lawyer who helped represent Arvey. “The Supreme Court is kind of like an elephant, they don't forget.”

Arvey, a big man and larger-than-life casino figure who wore jogging suits and big wigs to court, went by several names and nicknames including “Candy Man,” “Mr. Chin” and “Big Fat Daddy.” Some of the most prominent attorneys in town, including current Las Vegas Mayor Oscar Goodman and Harry Claiborne, represented him.

Arvey was sentenced in April 1978 to life in prison for sex crimes with minors. The high court granted his release two months later on a $100,000 bond. “Nobody thought he was a flight risk because in 1978 that was such a large amount of money,” Terry said.

Arvey, who would be 69, is still listed as a fugitive.

Terry said that in scheduling oral arguments in Simpson's case, the court might be signaling that some issues in his appeal have merit.

“In order to get bail pending appeal, you have to show there is a potential of reversal on appeal,” he said.

Simpson's lawyer, Yale Galanter, said that's what he hopes, too.

“I know my burden is high. I know them granting bond would be a really rare thing,” said Galanter, whose 30-page appeal calls Simpson's trial so rife with errors by the judge and prosecutors that his conviction should be reversed.

Galanter said Simpson, who has a residence in Miami, is so famous he couldn't possibly flee if he is released from prison.

“He's got no place to go, no place to hide,” his lawyer said. “News crews follow him to the restaurant, to the golf course, to school to pick up his kids. He's truly one of the most recognizable people on the planet.”

“The unjust outcome of not granting him a bond,” Galanter added, “is that if the case is reversed, he will have sat in prison and been punished for nothing, while the appeal winds its way through the system.”

Simpson turned 62 this month at Lovelock Correctional Center, 90 miles (145 kilometers) northeast of Reno. He's been working as a gym janitor while serving nine to 33 years for kidnapping and assault with a deadly weapon in the gunpoint robbery of two sports memorabilia dealers in a Las Vegas hotel room in September 2007.

A former golfing buddy and convicted co-defendant, Clarence “C.J.” Stewart, 55, is serving 7½ to 27 years at Northern Nevada Correctional Center in Carson City.

They have separate appeals pending with Supreme Court, along with requests to be let out of prison pending a decision.

Neither will be in court for separate 30-minute oral arguments their lawyers and prosecutors will make before three justices of the seven-member state high court — Michael Cherry, Nancy Saitta and Mark Gibbons. Gibbons is not related to the state's Republican governor, Jim Gibbons.

JoNell Thomas, a veteran Las Vegas lawyer in the special public defender's office, called the court's decision to hold a bond hearing for Simpson and Stewart “encouraging” for other appellants. “This tells me I need to file more bond motions on appeals,” Thomas said.

Howard Brooks, the Clark County deputy public defender who oversees appeals for every convicted indigent defendant in Las Vegas, called it unlikely that Simpson will win his appeal, and more unlikely that he'll be released on an appellate bond.

“The Nevada Supreme Court reverses about 2 to 5 percent of criminal appeals. That is a very low rate,” Brooks said. “The bottom line is, I'd say his chances of getting bond are one in a million.”

Justices have denied requests for bond by other high-profile defendants, including Sandy Murphy, who served nearly four years in the 1998 death of Las Vegas casino executive Ted Binion before her conviction was overturned. Murphy and co-defendant Rick Tabish won a new trial and were acquitted of murder in 2004.

The court also denied bond in 2004 to Peter Bergna, a former Lake Tahoe-area art appraiser whose conviction in the death of his wife in a staged car crash was later upheld.

Thomas, who read the Simpson appeal brief, said she doubted the high court would reveal during the hearing whether the justices think Simpson has a good case on appeal.

“All they're saying is there are interesting issues here,” she said. “That's a long way from saying they're going to reverse the case.”


Tags:
Crimesider ,
OJ ,
O.J. ,
Simpson ,
Release ,
Court ,
Las Vegas
Topics:
Daily Blotter
Add a Comment See all 30 Comments
by fuzzyi July 22, 2009 5:38 AM EDT
FREE THE MAN,,,,,,,
Reply to this comment
by harolddjohnson July 21, 2009 7:22 PM EDT
This is the worse mis-carriage of justice I have ever seen. O.J. is a prisoner for something he was accused of years ago and acquitted. This last thing stank to high heaven. I watched the trial on TV and thought it was a pure and simple set-up to get the man.

I don't have any love for O.J., but I hate to see anybody wronged. Here is a man sitting in prison for trying to reclaim His stuff. While Madoff stole billions of other people's stuff and was allowed to roam around. O.J. is not a flight risk!!! Where could he go!! He is just as much a political prisoner as anyone I've seen.

His conviction and imprisonment is shameful. "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere. " (MLK)
Reply to this comment
by ABM_21 July 20, 2009 11:28 PM EDT
YOu know, as much as it grieves me to do this, I have to disagree with OSU. O.J. flaunted his victory in CA in the collective faces of law enforcement across this nation. If a reasonable man would have been acquitted of murder, the last thing he would have done is get involved with another questionable act. That is proof of O.J.'s stupidity. Do I personally believe he is guilty? I don't know. The tapes of him insisting on keeping everyone in the room are pretty damning. Having siad that, I am conviced that the state of NV was essentially re-trying him for his ex-wife's and Ron Goldman's deaths. This time, they got the verdict many in white America thought was correct. I think he should stay there just based off his own ignorance and lacksidasical attitude towards the law. He grew up in the streets; he knew better.
Reply to this comment
by stickdog3 July 20, 2009 4:47 PM EDT
He shouldn't be in jail in the first place. That was a lame case. Just like the one in '95. Of course he should be released and all charges dropped. No brainer 101.
Reply to this comment
by jenkins501 July 20, 2009 3:59 PM EDT
He got away with it one time, I hope to God not a second time. I can't stand to see that grin ever again. Lock this Bas---d up and throw away the key. What a piece of brown stuff...............
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 21, 2009 12:26 AM EDT
Right, throw out the constitution because you don't like someone you have never met, but choose to assume that which wasn't able to be proven in court.

You neos crack me up.
by fuzzyi July 22, 2009 5:38 AM EDT
FREE THE BLACK MAN.
by Oregon_State_OSU July 20, 2009 3:43 PM EDT
FREE OJ.

Its the right thing to do.
Reply to this comment
by maddog0802 July 20, 2009 2:48 PM EDT
he should rot in jail until he dies.....at which time, he will rot in hell.....forever.
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 21, 2009 12:28 AM EDT
And so "God" has come to earth judge, using the sig of maddog0802.

Riight.
by grabandgo July 20, 2009 2:35 PM EDT
oj who?
Reply to this comment
by rafterman1 July 20, 2009 1:38 PM EDT
Those r*tards on the Supreme Court thought that most people wouldn't (easily) trade $100,000 (even in 1970's dollars) in order to not spend the rest of your life in prison? Were they that stupid?
Reply to this comment
by riob678 July 20, 2009 2:34 PM EDT
Apparently. Or, they were paid to decide in Arvey's favor.
by texasviewer July 20, 2009 1:17 PM EDT
I guess it really is true what they say -- Las Vegas is the mob capital of the world! Their involvement has to be the only way this poor excuse for a human being would be allowed out of prison pending appeal! And they really think he will return for the trial?

I'm in total agreement with Imadinnerjacket.... Let him have his appeal for the armed robbery then let us have a new trial for a double murder!
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 21, 2009 12:29 AM EDT
Why do you deserve to throw out the constitution?

An appeal is legal, double jeopardy is not.
by govtguy July 20, 2009 12:36 PM EDT
Simpson is a continuing reminder of the fallacies of fair and equal justice system. He has easily proven that the more money he can throw at the system, the less inconvenience and annoyance he has to deal with. It is no longer a murder case issue, but another instance of a high-profiler getting his (or her) own way. In his mind, he did his "time" for the robbery, now he wants back on the golf course. Personally, the space time continuum could open up and swallow him, and the world would be a better place...
Reply to this comment
by cwarner23 July 20, 2009 12:06 PM EDT
I could care less about this guy. But I think the sentence O.J. got was unfair and for payback for the fact that people think he got away with murder previously. Like I said, I'm not tossing and turning at night over this guy, but giving him that much time as payback is like double jeopardy. You are not only putting O.J. in jail for what he did in the hotel room but what many believe he did to Nicole and Goldman. It's illegal to try someone twice for the same crime.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 12:27 PM EDT
by itsjustathought "The man's ego is what got him caught....and only an ego the size of his would keep a man from taking advantage of getting away with 2 murders and staying out of trouble for the rest of a life"


EGO???

Are you forgetting that these men stole his football cards ? ? ?
by fedup12 July 20, 2009 1:26 PM EDT
Vicar....

Two wrongs dont make a right!
by barehand000 July 20, 2009 3:43 PM EDT
your point is very straight and to the point, but in the halls of justice, justice is in the halls...!!! This cat is a moron who simply does not understand power.
by jessec259 July 20, 2009 11:59 AM EDT
They need to let him go so that he can find the real killer
Reply to this comment
by ejcspau July 20, 2009 11:59 AM EDT
anyone got a white bronco?
Reply to this comment
by Slrman July 20, 2009 11:56 AM EDT
I have predicted all along that OJ will not serve much time. Now it looks as if that's coming true even faster than I expected.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 12:03 PM EDT
Never bet against the Juice!
by Imadinnerjacket July 20, 2009 11:34 AM EDT
I say, "give him a new trial for the stick up"

then give us a new trial for the double murder"

;)
Reply to this comment
by brianbwb-2009 July 21, 2009 12:21 AM EDT
Give "us"? as if you are even remotely significant enough to warrant consideration? Are You related in some form to Goldman? He doesn't even get a "new" one.

If you committed a double murder, then you by all means should stand trial, but if you are found not guilty, there is no "new trial". It is called "double jeopardy", and according to the constitution you cannot...

Oh I forgot, neos don't believe in the law any more.
by quickly101 July 20, 2009 11:33 AM EDT
I'm surprised he was ever put in jail to begin with. In America there are dual systems of justice, one for the wealthy, one for the poor. I hope this killer does not win release but he undoubtly will. I can't help if that jury who acquited him in the Brown and Goldman slaughter has trouble sleeping. Especially after a civil court found him guilty.
Reply to this comment
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
The Civil Court has a different Bourbon of Proof...about 80 Proof lower than the Criminal Court - that's why the Criminal Court got it right, and the civil court was just out to give the Jewish Goldman family reparations for the Holocaust.
by fedup12 July 20, 2009 1:24 PM EDT
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 11:36 AM EDT
The Civil Court has a different Bourbon of Proof...about 80 Proof lower than the Criminal Court - that's why the Criminal Court got it right, and the civil court was just out to give the Jewish Goldman family reparations for the Holocaust.
_______________________________________________________

LOL I liked Bourbon of Proof.
by DaVicar5 July 20, 2009 11:18 AM EDT
Run, O.J., RUN!
Reply to this comment
See all 30 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

Crimesider Topics

Crimesider is the ultimate destination for true-crime fans: riveting crimes, exclusive 911 calls, police interrogations, expert forensics, and more. It's in our DNA. Now it's in yours.

BOOK 'EM

Book 'Em: Mommy's Little Girl -- Casey Anthony and her Daughter Caylee's Tragic Fate

Diane Fanning Goes Behind the Headlines to Provide a Heartbreaking Account of a Case That Shocked the Nation

Photos
Scroll Left Scroll Right