Political Hotsheet
May 29, 2009 5:18 PM

Kennedy: Public Plan, Mandate In Health Care Bill

(CBS/John P. Filo)
Updated at 7:05 PM E.T. with new information about the timing of the bill's introduction.

Sen. Ted Kennedy, one of the major players in health care reform, could reportedly introduce a bill this month that includes a government-managed health care plan -- a key element of any proposal for liberal health care reform advocates.

A draft outline of health care legislation under preparation in the Senate Health, Education, Labor & Pensions (HELP) Committee also indicates the bill could include a mandate for all Americans to acquire health insurance, as well as a requirement for employers to contribute to workers' coverage, according to various reports.

The outline, according to the Washington Post, calls for expanding Medicaid to cover families with incomes up to 500 percent of the federal poverty level.

Bloomberg reports the bill may include a smaller expansion of Medicaid -- one that would cover people who earn up to 150 percent of the poverty level. The Children’s Health Insurance program, which currently covers people up to age 18, may also be expanded to cover people up to age 26. According to Bloomberg, the bill may also propose paying health care providers participating in a public plan 10 percent more than they receive under Medicare.

The Hotsheet confirmed the bill will likely be introduced within the first half of June, and the committee will hold mark up sessions in the second half of the month.

Meanwhile, President Obama's group Organizing for America begins on June 6 a nationwide, grassroots campaign to promote health care reform.

"If we don't get it done this year, we're not going to get it done," the president told supporters on a conference call yesterday.

The inclusion of a government-run health care plan in the legislation is a point of contention between liberal and conservative groups that are both advertising their points of view heavily.

Kennedy made clear in an op-ed he wrote Thursday in the Boston Globe that a public plan, as well as a mandate for all Americans to buy insurance, would be included in his bill.

"Some Americans want the choice of enrolling in a health insurance program backed by the government for the public good, not private profit - so that option will be available too," he wrote. "If we succeed in providing good health insurance options and make them affordable to all Americans regardless of income, then people should have a responsibility to buy it for their families."

Some more moderate senators have also expressed more interest in the idea of a public plan, according to the Huffington Post. Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.), who is working on his own health care legislation, is reportedly "fighting tooth and nail to include (a public option) in any final deal." Meanwhile, Sen. Ben Nelson (D-Neb.), who previously opposed a public option, said he is now open to the idea.
Tags:
Ted Kennedy ,
health care
Topics:
Health Care
Add a Comment See all 15 Comments
by starleo146 May 31, 2009 6:04 PM EDT
I am sorry he is sick, but I do not trust Kennedy, Dodd Kerry, Byrd, Reid,Kyl, Cornin ,Mc cain, the minority leader Mitch Mc Connell,Graham, well every republican no use printing there names none can be trusted the whole lot of them need to retire and we need to start over and elect anyone with some sense of honor I forgot the biggest doofus of all and he deserves to printed Lieberman. Vote them out folks all of them.Boehner in the house Blunt Cantor, Pelosi,We are in there hands God protect us cause they sure won't
Reply to this comment
by starleo146 May 31, 2009 5:49 PM EDT
After the credit card bill there is no telling how much they will get out of this do not trust anyone anymore all out to help the pharmaceuticals and anyone else connected to to health. What makes Kennedy a expert if the Massachusetts health plan is the answer it is costing the ordinary person plenty
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 31, 2009 4:08 PM EDT
The GOP imepedence of Health Care Reform is SICK!!
Reply to this comment
by DefendLiberty May 30, 2009 11:08 PM EDT
The GOP plan:

Health insurance for the healthy.

Health care for those who don't need it.

LIE, LIE, LIE. Try to BS America. NEVER let America figure out that the Dem plan offers the OPTION of a PUBLIC PLAN and is NOT "Government Run Care". It is a OPTION.

LIE, LIE, LIE to America that Dem. reform will take away your current health care.

Guarantee 30% PROFITS for the Health Insurance Companies who support the GOP.

No REGULATION prohibiting the Health Insurance Cuthroats from DENYING CARE to increase profits.

No REGULATION prohibiting the Health Insurance Monopoly from DENYING COVERAGE except to the HEALTHY.

LIE, LIE, LIE to protect your CONTRIBUTORS (Health Insurance Guild and the PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY).

F' the AMERICAN PEOPLE. If they are sick, then LET THEM DIE. (after bankrupting their family and friends to pay the uncovered bills of course... gotta fatten those PROFITS you know!).
Reply to this comment
by HGOODGUY May 30, 2009 5:53 PM EDT
GOP COMMENT ON HEALTH CARE PACKAGE

NOOOOOOOOOO---SCREW THE SICK!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by specialty8 May 30, 2009 9:28 AM EDT
Teddy should be in jail instead of robbing the American people for more. I would think he has enough.
Reply to this comment
by evilbusheviks May 30, 2009 9:11 AM EDT
Private insurers DENY TREATMENT ALL OF THE TIME. Their interest is in PROFIT, NOT YOUR HEALTH. They want you to just suck it up and DIE if you get sick.

WE NEED A government insurance OPTION in the USA, so you will NOT be DENIED COVERAGE BY GREEDY and UNSCRUPULOUS INSURANCE COMPANIES. At least you will have an OPTION.

posted by DefendLiberty
*********************

Yep....the CONStipated CONServitards are already fighting this health care OPTION, without even realizing they can keep their over-priced, for-profit health care with huge rising costs every year.

Did you republiCONS hear that?....keep your over-priced, for-profit health care if you want -- just let the rest of us that don't have access to corporate group rates or have pre-existing conditions that raise the for-profit health care well beyond reach.

Get over it.....and realize that the for-profit insurance companies have a 30% overhead that comes from overpriced premiums and government-run health care like Medicare has 3% overhead since they don't have GREEDY CEO's looking to skim a billion here and a billion there for their lavish lifestyles.

OPTIONS are always nice, since a one-size fits all certainly doesn't work when it comes to individuals and small businesses in the current for-profit health care debacle. America has nothing to lose to try something different, especially when it's only another OPTION.
Reply to this comment
by SITinRxcom May 30, 2009 7:50 AM EDT
I beleive the only effective measure of reducing costs is for physicians to disclose costs at the point of care, when both medical and fiancial decisions are made. I also believe that health care lobbyists will prevent Washington from enacting any legislation that protects the interests of the working family therefor I am advocating civil disobedience in the form of exam room sitins. To continue your analogy of "loading the titanic"

I believe a mutiny in the form of a tax payer revolt is in the making.

I invite you to visit my website at www.SITinRx.com to learn more.
Reply to this comment
by vinylogy May 30, 2009 1:44 AM EDT
Ted Kennedy is the guy who introduced "No Child Let Behind"! How'd that work out?
Reply to this comment
by dfnj2009 May 29, 2009 7:10 PM EDT
Hospitals and healthcare providers are in cohoots. Our system of healthcare is pure corruption.
Reply to this comment
by evilbusheviks May 30, 2009 9:19 AM EDT
This is exactly what can be expected in a for-profit health care system.
by dfnj2009 May 29, 2009 7:09 PM EDT
Now that the economy is DESTROYED, maybe it's time to close our 700+ foreign military base we have around the world we so desparately need to protect us from having our economy DESTROYED!
Reply to this comment
by DefendLiberty May 29, 2009 7:09 PM EDT
It's a public plan OPTION. You keep your private plan if you want. The ONLY reason the HEALTH INSURANCE COMPANIES and their GOP toadies are fighting this is because it will CUT INTO THEIR PROFITS.

If the public plan is no good, if it ends up being worse rationing than what the INSURANCE COMPANIES do, then NO ONE WILL USE IT.

RATIONING? What the INSURANCE COMPANIES ARE ALL ABOUT!

A "Health insurance company" denies a man treatment for COPD to INCREASE THEIR PROFITS. He paid his premiums every month. When it came time to collect it was, "sorry fella, go off and die". Now he's trying to raise $500k in donations- IN THE USA. No appeal, just suck it up and DIE.

EVERY TIME the GOP cries that you will be DENIED COVERAGE by having the OPTION of a GOVERNMENT RUN insurance plan. THINK ABOUT THIS MAN.

There was another story just like this on our local news last week. A woman with BRAIN CANCER who was denied the ONLY treatment that would save her life because BLUE SHIELD RULES would not let her be treated because the number of tumors was "over the limit" that allowed treatment (a "limit" that her DOCTOR said was completely arbitrary and without medical basis). The DOCTOR said that all she got from BLUE SHIELD was the runaround, but no "OK". The patient will just have to drawl off and die. The insurance companies are all about MAKING A PROFIT. You can DIE as far as they are concerned (as long as your estate pays your back-bills of course).

There was another article yesterday about BLUE SHIELD revoking insurance RETROACTIVELY. You PAY your premiums, then when you get SICK, the INSURANCE COMPANY RETROACTIVELY REVOKES YOUR INSURANCE and makes you pay ALL of your OLD BILLS that they paid initially. "Buy insurance from the INSURANCE COMPANIES and DIE".

Private insurers DENY TREATMENT ALL OF THE TIME. Their interest is in PROFIT, NOT YOUR HEALTH. They want you to just suck it up and DIE if you get sick.

WE NEED A government insurance OPTION in the USA, so you will NOT be DENIED COVERAGE BY GREEDY and UNSCRUPULOUS INSURANCE COMPANIES. At least you will have an OPTION.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 May 29, 2009 6:45 PM EDT
I'm sure you mean well...but every one of the socialist programs that you have engineered are now bankrupt, the funds stolen from it, or was a big scam in the first place.
Posted by TheEverReadyBunny

Kind of like all the private scams on wall street. How is the 401k doing (don't bother answering, you wouldn't be honest anyway).
Reply to this comment
by evilbusheviks May 30, 2009 9:15 AM EDT
The trust funds were added to the general funds for Vietnam spending first in 1969 under ticky dickie, and have been stolen since then, by 5 republiCON presidents and 2 Dem presidents. Medicare is in the RED for the first time this year and predicted to be bankrupt by 2017. Social Security is in much better shape and predicted to be bankrupt in 2037.
See all 15 Comments

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
HOTSHEET ON TWITTER