Political Hotsheet
May 26, 2009 1:28 PM

Obama Pick Leaves GOP In Difficult Spot

(AP Photo/Alex Brandon)
It’s day one of a weeks-long nomination process for Sonia Sotomayor, President Obama’s selection for the Supreme Court, and given today’s political climate, the initial analysis of his choice is turning out to be quite positive. Because of this climate, the president clearly feels he has the political capital to get Sotomayor, someone that conservatives feel was the most liberal on his short list, onto the Court.

With his choice, the president pleased his base and Hispanic groups. Are there risks? Of course. But the risk-reward ratio weighs heavily in the president’s favor. Barring any major issues that have yet to be uncovered about Judge Sotomayor, even many Republicans are resigned to the fact that she’ll most likely wind up being confirmed.

The Republicans, however, will do their best to not make it a cakewalk.

And this is where Mr. Obama’s choice of Sotomayor gets interesting. He’s put the onus on the Republicans to figure out how to react.

Normally, the opposition - Republican or Democrat, depending on the president - would come out guns ablaze after the nominee, doing their darndest to tar him or her from the moment of the announcement through the confirmation process. And, normally, this tactic works in the opposition’s favor; if they can't derail the nominee, at least they can use the partisan fight as an opportunity to raise money from their base.

This year is much different, and the nomination of Sotomayor “does create a difficult situation politically for the Republicans,” said one Democratic strategist, who asked for anonymity because of their relationship with the White House.

Why is it different? Because Sotomayor is Hispanic and she’s a woman.

Fully aware of the precarious political position the Republican Party finds itself in after losing badly in 2008, especially among Hispanic and female voters, Senate Republican leaders have urged their ranks to hold their fire, specifically asking them in talking points distributed last week and obtained by CBS News not to “pre-judge” or “pre-confirm” the president’s pick.

The tightrope the Republicans have to walk on over the coming weeks: how to counter this historic nomination without alienating two important voting blocs, women and Latinos?

This, according to the Democratic strategist, is “an additional benefit” of the president’s choice, making sure to point out that choosing a Supreme Court justice is a “special case” and politics was not part of the decision-making process.

A perfect example of someone caught between two competing interests: Sen. John Cornyn, R-Tex., who’s balancing two roles as a Judiciary Committee member and the Chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee.

He and the rest of the Republicans on the Judiciary Committee will be under immense pressure to join the blowtorching from conservative groups that will be doing their best to criticize Sotomayor.

However, as chairman of the NRSC, he knows more than anyone that any negative reaction to Republicans' handling of this historic nomination could have negative repercussions in the 2010 midterm elections.

“Therefore, it is imperative that my colleagues and members of the media do not pre-judge or pre-confirm Ms. Sotomayor," Cornyn said in a statement today, modeled after the talking points distributed by the Senate Republican Conference. "It is my hope that the process will allow her to prove herself to possess the impartiality, integrity, legal expertise and judicial temperament that we have come to expect from those that sit on our highest court. She must prove her commitment to impartially deciding cases based on the law, rather than based on her own personal politics, feelings, and preferences.”

“We maintain and build credibility by approaching this with an open mind,” one Republican strategist told CBS News. “Republicans are trying to take the responsible approach.”

Ultimately, “It's going to be very hard for any senator, Republican or Democrat, to vote against her,” Sen. Chuck Schumer, D-N.Y said today.

But for those Republicans that do vote against her, that “responsible approach” may be their only strategy to avoid negative ripple effects from bucking the current pro-Obama political climate.

Steve Chaggaris is CBS News' Political Director.



Do you approve of President's Obama choice of Sonia Sotomayor for the Supreme Court?
 Yes
 No



Tags:
Sonia Sotomayor ,
Supreme Court ,
Steve Chaggaris
Topics:
Sonia Sotomayor
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 210 Comments
by BeckieBest May 26, 2009 11:44 PM EDT
It's going to be fun watching the Rushpublicans try to smear her to their own detriment.
Reply to this comment
by nearl451 May 26, 2009 11:31 PM EDT
It IS going to be entertaining to see the tack that Repubs use.

I almost wish that Arlen would switch back over for the questioning. It was very amusing to watch Arlen and Orrin tag team on sexual innuendo (an awkward topic for these two) against Anita Hill.

There will be some funny one liners, you can bet on it.
Reply to this comment
by burneb May 26, 2009 11:30 PM EDT
Scalia seems to practice his own brand of personal ideology and whims, which conservatives call judicial activism whenever liberals do it.

However Scalia's legal and scholarly credentials are cited as a redeeming excuse. Will conservatives accept the same for Sotomayer?
Reply to this comment
by DefendLiberty May 26, 2009 10:38 PM EDT
It's going to be fun watching the obsolete GOP run around shooting randomly at each other. Hey (GOP) guys, keep claiming that this is an "affirmative action pick". Keep claiming that only far right judges are acceptable. PLEASE keep up the neocon/ evangelical/ far-right game plan. Your base will love you.
Reply to this comment
by forrestlayne May 26, 2009 9:57 PM EDT
All this shows is how out of touch the US Supreme Court has gotten to be. It's people like her who are making rulings the majority of people support. It's only the minority of fruitcakes like yourself who are supporting the decisions of the Court nowadays.
Posted by tmittelstaed at 2:36 PM : May 26, 2009

The US is supposed to be republic Not a democracy. The constitution and bill of rights were set up so the majority could not trample the rights of the few. That's exactly the fight in Calf. right now. The majority said no to gay marriage, now the gay marriage supporters want the conservative court to protect their individual rights over majority rule.

Sorry - can't have it both ways
Reply to this comment
by bluegrass101-2009 May 26, 2009 9:56 PM EDT
The Party of Repukes Wrapped the American Flag around themselves and proclaimed themselves to be the True Patriots. Then they snookered the Evangelicals into believing they were the True Believers and made sure they were Photo-Op 'ed sitting in the Front Row at a church in DC. Condi, Rumsfeld, Rove, Cheney, Bush sitting in the front row their with their hands folded, as they contemplated the Neo-Cons plan for the invasion of Iraq, pushed by the American Enterprise Institute. The Failed Plan became the Destruction of the American Economy and the Constitution became a Roll of Toilet Paper for Wolfowitz, Frum, Kristol,John Yoo, Kagan,Gerson, Bybee,George Will and the Heritage Foundation.
Reply to this comment
by dfnj2009 May 26, 2009 9:41 PM EDT
The party of southern white men is not going to accept a latino woman as being equal!
Reply to this comment
by democracy1 May 26, 2009 8:42 PM EDT
Posted by alphaa10000 at 5:03 PM : May 26, 2009

Excellent post! On a number of different levels. I doubt any of the "Party of No" can substantially debate your post on any level.
Reply to this comment
by omega39-2009 May 26, 2009 8:23 PM EDT
Now only if we could formulate some inane response with which to reply and all use it during the course of a week. You know, something akin to 'I'll swoon'.


Posted by _LawyersGuns-n-Money

I suspect she means "I'll swan" which Oxford lists as an old dialect for I'll swear.
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat45 May 26, 2009 8:06 PM EDT
Hey, Jim, LGM, Gravy!

I'm just amazed she branched out with her paranoia. I was starting to think I was everyone...

I remember her even accusing Masses of being me for about a week.
Posted by slownewday_05

Right now it's you, me and hungry.

Idn't she fun? lol
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 26, 2009 7:58 PM EDT
LOL And you wonder why the Klan failed!! LOL Semper Fi Bro!!
Posted by skyk-2009 at 4:51 PM : May 26, 2009

Semper Fi, bro.

You good?
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 26, 2009 7:51 PM EDT
The Democrats can't afford to have blacks leave the plantation, gotta keep them in line with whatever it takes.
Posted by hawksprings at 4:34 PM : May 26, 2009

Right.

Just like electing one president.

Sheesh.....
Posted by formrusmcsgt at 4:37 PM : May 26, 2009


LOL And you wonder why the Klan failed!! LOL Semper Fi Bro!!
Reply to this comment
by skyk-2009 May 26, 2009 7:50 PM EDT
We don't know wheter to aim and fire or just have pity on you.
Posted by _LawyersGuns-n-Money_ at 4:49 PM : May 26, 2009

Now THAT is funny!
Reply to this comment
by gravyboat45 May 26, 2009 7:50 PM EDT
The Democrats can't afford to have blacks leave the plantation, gotta keep them in line with whatever it takes.
Posted by hawksprings at 4:34 PM : May 26, 2009

That's just friggin hilarious, given that Michael Steele is attempting to appeal to black people via his,"hop hop", slang usage.

lmao Steeley up in the hizzie!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 26, 2009 7:47 PM EDT
WELCOME TO THE IDIOT'S BRIGADE

Posted by HGOODGUY at 4:46 PM : May 26, 2009

Sorry, you just missed rowdy.....
Reply to this comment
by HGOODGUY May 26, 2009 7:46 PM EDT
WELCOME TO THE IDIOT'S BRIGADE

OH LOOK!! A NEW NOMINEEE!!!

IT'S TARGET PRACTICE TIME!!!!!!
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 26, 2009 7:43 PM EDT
Off her meds again ... very sad situation.
Posted by jimsmename at 4:40 PM : May 26, 2009

This "not finding a site" remark of hers harks back to last spring when I challenged her to put up a credible source on something.

She cited the Business Daily Journal, as I recall, and I went theough all of the articles in the news section and found nothing to validate her point.

She was using an Op/Ed piece as her "credible source"......
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 26, 2009 7:41 PM EDT
They are already calling her a LIBERAL like it's still a dirty word in America.
Posted by endrepubs at 4:38 PM : May 26, 2009

Rush had called her a racist with a couple of hours of the announcement.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 26, 2009 7:39 PM EDT
pant pant pant ...

If I could just get behind that damned curtain!

scratch scratch ....
Posted by jimsmename at 4:36 PM : May 26, 2009

One day she accused about 8 of us as being all alter-ego's of mine.

I would have to be able to do 500 key strokes a minute for that to be true.

Hilarious.
Reply to this comment
by formrusmcsgt May 26, 2009 7:37 PM EDT
Later sarge...
Posted by gravyboat45 at 4:34 PM : May 26, 2009

Roger that, bro.
Reply to this comment
See all 210 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Can the Postal Service be Saved?

    (300 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER