Political Hotsheet
December 21, 2008 11:29 AM

N.Y. Republicans Slam Caroline Kennedy

As the daughter of Camelot bids for Hillary Clinton's Senate seat, New York Republicans launched a full-out attack on the potential appointee on CBS' Face The Nation this morning.

"We've seen the Senate sort of become a House of Lords," Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y., former chairman of the NRCC, told Bob Schieffer. "We are seeing a seat-warmer in Delaware, a seat-seller in Illinois, and we are making seat cushions in New York for sort of an aristocrat, royalty and entitlement coming in here."

Reynolds also noted that during her last visit to blue-collar Buffalo, Kennedy arrived in a foreign SUV and left in a Jeep.

Rep. Peter King, R-N.Y., who has publicly made clear his intention to run for Clinton's seat in 2010, said that in New York "the last thing we need is a People Magazine celebrity as our United States Senator, especially someone who has no experience, as far as I know, has never held a real job and now it's come out she hasn't voted."

King warned that if Kennedy wins the nod from Gov. David Paterson over other prospects, including several sitting Congressmen and women, "there is going to be magnifying glass on her," and "the Republican candidate in 2010 will have a better opportunity against Caroline Kennedy than against the others."

Though admitting she is an attractive candidate, even N.Y. Democrat Rep. Gary Ackerman was guarded about Kennedy: "DNA can only take you so far in the business," he said.
Tags:
Carolyn kennedy ,
new york ,
senate ,
clinton ,
king ,
ackerman
Topics:
Senate
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment See all 32 Comments
by McHineguy December 21, 2008 5:55 PM EST
So a democrat running for president and spending most of his time on the campaign trail, is expected to vote MORE than people that are supposed to be working in Washington?


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by IamHungry68 at 02:04 PM : Dec 21, 2008

Actually, the statistics I was quoting were from before his campaign. Back when he was part of Blagojovichs campaign and Rev Wrights flock. And my goal was nto to start this whole debate again. It was to point out to another poster that the statistics about how often a person votes were hardly relevent to the argument.
Reply to this comment
by McHineguy December 21, 2008 5:53 PM EST
...
and the republicans want to mock the democrats about having another kennedy in washington? so what royal family is the kennedy''''s related to? NONE! The republicans just can''''t stand the fact that us working class people like the Kennedy''''s because they support working class people... and not oil companies and walmart executives!


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by auscross1277 at 02:04 PM : Dec 21, 2008

Not mocking at all. We just think you should get to vote for your choices. But when you cant do that, they chould choose someone who you voted for in the past. Or, maybe someone who has done somethign like that job in the past. Or maybe someone like the person who held the job recently. But at all costs, not another rich elite who has more money than a even a CEO and has no philanthropic ties.

Have you noticed that the Democrat leaders are all rich and SAY they are for the working class? Its because they need well mannered servants.
Reply to this comment
by auscross1277 December 21, 2008 5:24 PM EST
I am an independent who voted for Obama. I am against the appointment of Caroline Kennedy. She is a spoiled, rich society matron, who happens to have a famous name. I suspect she is being groomed to run for president after Obama leaves office. I, for one, have never admired the Kennedys who were more media than substance.
Posted by allmymarbles at 02:18 PM : Dec 21, 2008
** I''d rather have someone with no substance... rather than someone that supports oil companies or the walmart executives the way the evil republicans have lately!
Reply to this comment
by auscross1277 December 21, 2008 5:18 PM EST
"Shouldn''''t voter have to pass an intelligence test?"
reply, "You don''''t have to be intelligent to vote!"
reply, "What if there are more stipid people than intelligent people??"
reply,,"Then the Democrat wins!!"
Posted by Platteman at 02:10 PM : Dec 21, 2008
*** So you really want over 20 million illegals getting amnesty and taking our jobs? Why do you so blindly support republicans that only care about rich people and illegal immigrants?
Reply to this comment
by allmymarbles December 21, 2008 5:18 PM EST
I am an independent who voted for Obama. I am against the appointment of Caroline Kennedy. She is a spoiled, rich society matron, who happens to have a famous name. I suspect she is being groomed to run for president after Obama leaves office. I, for one, have never admired the Kennedys who were more media than substance.
Reply to this comment
by platteman December 21, 2008 5:10 PM EST
The Wizard of Id said it best.

"Shouldn''t voter have to pass an intelligence test?"
reply, "You don''t have to be intelligent to vote!"
reply, "What if there are more stipid people than intelligent people??"
reply,,"Then the Democrat wins!!"
Reply to this comment
by auscross1277 December 21, 2008 5:07 PM EST
Interesting statistics you have posted. Did you bother to notice how often B Obama voted? My sources say it was less than 50%
Posted by machineguy at 01:55 PM : Dec 21, 2008
** I would rather have Obama as president and have him not vote on anything... rather than amnesty mccain... that when amnesty mccain wants to try and do his job... he tries passing amnesty for over 20 million illegal immigrants... why doesn''t he pass a bill that will give help to over 20 million LEGAL CITIZENS!! just goes to show that amnesty mccain and the republicans only care about their very wealthy buddies... and illegal foreigners!
Reply to this comment
by auscross1277 December 21, 2008 5:04 PM EST
We''ve seen the Senate sort of become a House of Lords," Rep. Tom Reynolds, R-N.Y.,.... and yet the Bush family of the republican party..The Bush family is related to the Royal family of Queen Elizabeth.. and the republicans want to mock the democrats about having another kennedy in washington? so what royal family is the kennedy''s related to? NONE! The republicans just can''t stand the fact that us working class people like the Kennedy''s because they support working class people... and not oil companies and walmart executives!
Reply to this comment
by cdfoxtrot6 December 21, 2008 5:02 PM EST
I didn''t hear the Republicans complaining about "celebrity" when ramming Sarah Palin down our throats. There''s a celebrity, who has done everything she can to stay in the spotlight. I don''t know that much about Caroline Kennedy, but I''d feel a lot safer with a Kennedy representing me than a Palin. You betcha. Wink, wink.
Reply to this comment
by zzy-izzy December 21, 2008 5:00 PM EST
ANY PEICE OF S-H-I-T REPUBLICAN THAT IS FIVE UP FROM THE BOTTEM CANT SAY ANYTHING ABOUT ANYBODY HOW CAN ANYONE SAY ANYTHING THAT IS 430 OUT OF 435 MY DOG WOULD BE BETTER AT THE JOB THAN A REPUBLICAN.
Reply to this comment
by McHineguy December 21, 2008 4:57 PM EST
She know more then all the DUMB Republicans in N.Y. Wht don''''t you all shut the HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLL up. You, The Republicans, are no more then SCUM.


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by hitoyou11 at 01:47 PM : Dec 21, 2008

WOW!!! Intelligent, well reasoned posts like that sure are convincing. Now I kow why everyone likes the humanitarian Democrats.
Reply to this comment
by McHineguy December 21, 2008 4:55 PM EST
Hmmm... sour grapes is right... According to the voting records at votesmart, Reynolds misses 6% of all vote and King misses 3% of all votes.. You don''''t need friggin'''' experience to be absent.. We elect these *** to a FULL TIME job... and we get absences..

The top four delinquents in Congressional voting are all Republicans.. The top one, Norwood from Georgia, has missed more than 90% of the votes.. who the hell elected that jerk..??

The four Congresspeople that have not missed a single vote are three Democrats and one Republican... just goes to show you who takes their ELECTED positions seriously...

Republicans aren''''t worth ***...




--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Posted by ne_patriot7 at 01:50 PM : Dec 21, 2008

Interesting statistics you have posted. Did you bother to notice how often B Obama voted? My sources say it was less than 50%
Reply to this comment
by ne_patriot7 December 21, 2008 4:50 PM EST
Hmmm... sour grapes is right... According to the voting records at votesmart, Reynolds misses 6% of all vote and King misses 3% of all votes.. You don''t need friggin'' experience to be absent.. We elect these *** to a FULL TIME job... and we get absences..

The top four delinquents in Congressional voting are all Republicans.. The top one, Norwood from Georgia, has missed more than 90% of the votes.. who the hell elected that jerk..??

The four Congresspeople that have not missed a single vote are three Democrats and one Republican... just goes to show you who takes their ELECTED positions seriously...

Republicans aren''t worth ***...

Reply to this comment
by hitoyou11 December 21, 2008 4:47 PM EST
She know more then all the DUMB Republicans in N.Y. Wht don''t you all shut the HELLLLLLLLLLLLLLL up. You, The Republicans, are no more then SCUM.
Reply to this comment
by bradkt1 December 21, 2008 4:47 PM EST
As long as he/she is a Democrat and isn''t associated with the Clintons, I''m good with the choice!
If it''s Caroline Kennedy, so be it.
Reply to this comment
by JRC_903 December 21, 2008 4:46 PM EST
I guess it is not surprising that the republicans are finding fault with Caroline Kennedy--after all that is their job. In general, I support her candidacy for this job--however, in my opinion, she must not continue to rest on the assumption that her name--and her name alone is all that matters here. I know *** well she has the smarts and the education for this job. But to replace the ice-lady, she better start looking the camera in the face, and answering some questions. (--her excellent background notwithstanding, she is about as inspiring as Sarah (the dub) Palin.) Otherwise,despite what the governor does, many people (including me) will put the state/country first, and her second.
Reply to this comment
by karenbe111 December 21, 2008 4:35 PM EST
The best endorsement a candidate could get, being slammed by a Republican, a totally bankrupt (in every way) political party!
Reply to this comment
by luvcomments December 21, 2008 4:26 PM EST
habu99

Amen !!!! That''s what we''ve all been thinking all along !!!

And, of course the Republicans are slamming her - that''s the only thing they are good at: slamming other people...... because they have absolutely nothing worthy of offering to the people themselves.
Reply to this comment
by hetup-2009 December 21, 2008 4:20 PM EST
Is she good looking? Maybe more of us would like to slam her, ha ha
Reply to this comment
by habu99-2009 December 21, 2008 4:09 PM EST
Kennedy has a "lack of experience", according to the GOP, to perform the job she is campaigning for? Pure hypocrisy as Sarah Palin and George W. Bush were singularly unqualified to run for the positions they ran for and yet the Republicans embraced both as saviors. Today''s Republican Party-the home of hypocrites, liars, and thieves.
Reply to this comment
See all 32 Comments

About Political Hotsheet

Stay up to the minute on the latest news and developments from Washington, from the White House to Congress and everything in-between with the best political reporters from CBS News and CBSNews.com.

E-Mail Political Hotsheet
Follow On Twitter

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Obama, GOP Clash over cure for Economy

    (327 recent comments)

HOTSHEET ON TWITTER