Horserace
May 1, 2008 9:42 AM

Starting Gate: Worth Fighting For

(AP Photo/Carolyn Kaster)
Everyone knows the mantra by now when it comes to the shape of the Democratic race and even the most devoted supporters of Hillary Clinton would surely acknowledge that her chances of wresting the nomination away from Barack Obama are slim at best. And Slim may be leaving the building should Obama win Indiana on Tuesday.

Barring a complete meltdown, Clinton will almost certainly finish the primaries behind in pledged delegates won and most likely trailing in the popular vote. And, if you believe the buzz that has been emanating from the Obama camp recently, those all-important superdelegates are poised to put him over the top – or at least get him very, very close.

So why is Clinton fighting so hard still? Because, while every nomination is worth having, this one is worth doing almost anything to get and it might even be worth the risk of blowing up the party.

The latest CBS News/New York Times poll tells the tale. Despite the seeming strength of presumptive GOP nominee John McCain in current head-to-head matchups, the party’s brand could not get much lower. Just 33 percent of registered voters said they have a favorable opinion of the Republican Party. Voters say they are likely to vote Democratic in congressional races by a 50 percent to 32 percent margin. The Democratic Party has wide advantages when it comes to dealing with issues like the economy, health care, the war in Iraq, immigration and even higher marks on sharing moral values.

In the perception game, voters expect a Democrat to win the White House by a 56 percent to 32 percent margin.

And the poll holds some troubling signs for Obama’s campaign. Clinton does better against McCain in the general election matchup, giving her more ammunition for the electability argument. White women are deserting him in the poll and his unfavorable ratings have risen. He remains in a strong position to win the nomination but his support has eroded in the wake of his Pennsylvania loss and the “bitter” and Wright controversies.

Given the vulnerabilities that seem to be creeping into Obama’s campaign, why should Clinton drop out – even in June. Why not hang around and see what happens during the summer, if not wage an active campaign, then at least remain viable until Denver?


Another “Judas?” Former Clinton friends and associates are bailing out all over the place. Former DNC chairman Joe Andrew, who was appointed to head the party by then-President Clinton, is de-endorsing Hillary Clinton and supporting Obama. Andrew will announce his decision in his home state of Indiana today and tells the AP that he wants to heal the rifts in the party. “I am convinced that the primary process has devolved to the point that it's now bad for the Democratic Party," Andrew said. In a letter he wrote to fellow superdelegates, Andrew says that “a vote for Hillary Clinton is a vote to continue this process, and a vote to continue this process is a vote that assists (Republican) John McCain. … While I was hopeful that a long, contested primary season would invigorate our party, the polls show that the tone and temperature of the race is now hurting us.”


Sneaking Up In North Carolina? With all the attention for next Tuesday’s primary fixated on Indiana, which is widely considered a near toss-up, don’t forget about North Carolina. Despite having held a twenty-point lead or more just weeks ago, recent polls indicate a tightening in the state. And Obama supporters, many of whom argued that their candidate did well by closing a similar Clinton lead in Pennsylvania to ten points on election day, are playing down expectations. “We didn't accept the double-digit lead of a couple of weeks ago,” Rep. G.K Butterfield, an Obama backer, tells the Raleigh News & Observer. “People are beginning to settle down and look at the race and make final choices. I think it will be a single-digit win.”


Around The Track

  • John McCain will continue his week-long focus on health care in Cleveland today where he’ll talk about giving patients more choices and information on their options. “When families are informed about medical choices, they are more capable of making their own decisions, less likely to choose the most expensive and often unnecessary options, and are more satisfied with their choices,” McCain will say according to prepared remarks.

  • Former presidential candidate and ordained Baptist minister Mike Huckabee said yesterday that he thinks the Rev. Wright does not want to see Obama succeed because it would show there has been improvement in race relations in the U.S. “Jeremiah Wright needs for Obama to lose so he can justify his anger, his hostile bitterness against the United States of America," Huckabee said.

  • Clinton’s campaign has turned around an ad with their most recent high-profile North Carolina backer, Gov. Mike Easley. “These are tough times in America and I think that Hillary is the one we can count on to get the job done,” Easley says in the ad.

  • With all the attention on next Tuesday, the Clinton campaign is signaling they’re looking ahead. Bill Clinton is visiting the University of West Virginia today. That state’s primary is May 13th.

  • Tags:
    Hillary Clinton ,
    Barack Obama ,
    John McCain ,
    CBS News poll
    Topics:
    Starting Gate
    Share:
    • Share
    • Yahoo! Buzz
    • Mixx
    Add a Comment See all 29 Comments
    by petronew May 4, 2008 1:31 AM EDT
    True the Starting Gate is worth fighting for IFF you are a strong contender NOT a strong Pretender. Mrs. C is not a strong contender and should not be racing anyone. As for Mr. Wright, in your heart of hearts you all know the News machine is responsbile for keeping this issue alive. Politics and news, will when it ever change, when Obama gets elected I suppose.
    Reply to this comment
    by b-easy63 May 2, 2008 1:45 PM EDT
    And Governor Huckabee has a unique way with words that he can keep the Democrats on the defensive while McCain makes his case to the people."

    In a dramatic turn of events the Republicans are seeing daylight at the end of the tunnel after all. Well that is if they can tap Huckabee as McCain''''s VP before his talent agency places Huckabee in a prime time TV sitcom slot.

    Posted by giantrobot2 at 09:41 PM : May 01, 2008


    Huckabee? Well in the words of Mike Huckabee as quoted in the above article about Obama and Wright:

    "Former presidential candidate and ordained Baptist minister Mike Huckabee said yesterday that he thinks the Rev. Wright does not want to see Obama succeed because it would show there has been improvement in race relations in the U.S. %u201CJeremiah Wright needs for Obama to lose so he can justify his anger, his hostile bitterness against the United States of America," Huckabee said."


    Maybe the "words" of your beloved Huckabee will give a boost to the Obama campaign as others reflect on why Wright is saying the things he is saying. I would not be surprised if we learn Wright was always a Clinton supporter and it was he that leaked his sermons out and he is being paid by HRC right now to try to nullify Obama. Because only a backstabbing enemy would say the things Wright has said in the past few days. Somebody better check who else Hill owes money too--or maybe Wright is smart enough to get his upfront, in nice foil wrapped packages already for his freezer. LMAO
    Reply to this comment
    by b-easy63 May 2, 2008 1:40 PM EDT
    just by the way - there was NOT EVEN ONE, who switched from Obama to Clinton''''''''s camp.

    Keep in mind.





    -----------------------
    ----------------------------------------
    -----------------

    Posted by lordmi at 04:30 PM : May 01, 2008

    Keep in mind Obama didn''''t have ANY! lol

    Clinton got 5 new ones today, who knows if they were going to support Obama and then decided to endorse Clinton.

    Especially now they''''ve gotten proof of how Obama lies after his conduct over Rev. Wright this week!

    Posted by RowdyTexan2 at 01:20 AM : May 02, 2008


    Would, coulda, shoulda---the POINT is, that Hillary has avowed supporters who already were pledged to her--but are now stepping out and reneging on that pledge to her.

    Who knows? It could be a true change of heart. It could what is expedient....It could be true abhorrence to what HRC is doing and they want NO part of it.


    Then again, a leader leads by example. In that case--Promises and pledges mean nothing to Hillary--so why should they mean anything to the people who initially supported her? She has taught them all very well.
    Reply to this comment
    by rowdytexan2 May 2, 2008 4:20 AM EDT
    just by the way - there was NOT EVEN ONE, who switched from Obama to Clinton''''s camp.

    Keep in mind.





    --------------------------------------------------------------------------------

    Posted by lordmi at 04:30 PM : May 01, 2008

    Keep in mind Obama didn''t have ANY! lol

    Clinton got 5 new ones today, who knows if they were going to support Obama and then decided to endorse Clinton.

    Especially now they''ve gotten proof of how Obama lies after his conduct over Rev. Wright this week!
    Reply to this comment
    by rowdytexan2 May 2, 2008 4:18 AM EDT
    Posted by daninmadison at 05:18 PM : May 01, 2008

    lol, No they''re not. Everybody knows when Magnequench was sold to the Chinese the agreement was that the plant would stay in Indiana.

    When Bush took office, they appealed again to move it China and Bush let them.

    Geezus, Obama honkers will lie about anything!
    Reply to this comment
    by lordmi May 2, 2008 3:47 AM EDT
    it is incorrect approach trying to predict, whAt would be the picture, when you include all 3 candidates. Specially in reference of elections, which already passed : it is just speculation, ''What if". Having 3 on the ballot You can not propose, how it will play, when only 2 would be left.
    Except - mcCain has no chances to win , when Bush is behind.
    So what matters more - to have a Decent Honest person as Dem''s Candidate, which is CERTAINLY NOT Dirty Clinton.
    Reply to this comment
    by popstom1 May 2, 2008 2:41 AM EDT
    Magnequench was sold by the stock
    holders Bush could have stop it
    Reply to this comment
    by popstom1 May 2, 2008 2:34 AM EDT
    Obama can not beat huckabee and
    McCain
    Reply to this comment
    by popstom1 May 2, 2008 2:28 AM EDT
    Just what was the back room deal
    the cheep gold plated chicago
    slum lord lawyer politiciian Obama
    made to Mr Andrew maybe a nice
    post or Rev.Wright Job
    Reply to this comment
    by giantrobot2 May 2, 2008 12:41 AM EDT
    *** BREAKING NEWS ***

    Senator McCain & Governor Huckabee are teaming up to take on the Democrats this November.

    Sources that can''t be identified have said, "I think Senator McCain feels very comfortable with Governor Huckabee, I wouldn''t be suprised if he picks him as his Vice Presidential running mate."

    It''s becoming clear, McCain can use Huckabee''s articulate speaking skills to toss zingers over to the Obama Hillary campaign while McCain concentrates on keeping his agenda moving.

    "The McCain Romney ticket has no chance of blooming in my opinion. Both are too mechanically driven, making it unbalanced and artifical. The RNC now realizes this and your starting to see signs of them warming up to Governor Huckabee."

    Can the RNC really turn the tide and support Governor Huckabee?

    "I''m not one to predict anything, but let me tell you this. Money can''t beat the Democrats this year, but words can. We are seeing it in the Obama flack now, he was leading in the polls but now he can''t pull himself out no matter how much money he has. It goes to show money is not as important as words in this election. And Governor Huckabee has a unique way with words that he can keep the Democrats on the defensive while McCain makes his case to the people."

    In a dramatic turn of events the Republicans are seeing daylight at the end of the tunnel after all. Well that is if they can tap Huckabee as McCain''s VP before his talent agency places Huckabee in a prime time TV sitcom slot.
    Reply to this comment
    by greenfun May 1, 2008 9:31 PM EDT
    Obama has a way of ducking hard votes or explaining away his bad votes by trying to blame poorly-written statutes. Case in point: an amendment he voted on as part of a recent bankruptcy bill before the US Senate would have capped credit card interest rates at 30 percent. Inexplicably, Obama voted against it, although it would have been the beginning of setting these predatory lending rates under federal control. Even Senator Hillary Clinton supported it.

    Now Obama explains his vote by saying the amendment was poorly written or set the ceiling too high. His explanation isn''t credible as Obama offered no lower number as an alternative, and didn''t put forward his own amendment clarifying whatever language he found objectionable.

    Why wouldn''t Obama have voted to create the first federal ceiling on predatory credit card interest rates, particularly as he calls himself a champion of the poor and middle classes? Perhaps he was signaling to the corporate establishment that they need not fear him. For all of his dynamic rhetoric about lifting up the masses, it seems Obama has little intention of doing anything concrete to reverse the cycle of poverty many struggle to overcome.
    Reply to this comment
    by truthyness May 1, 2008 8:42 PM EDT
    OBAMA/REV. WRIGHT IN ''08
    Reply to this comment
    by DCropp May 1, 2008 8:18 PM EDT
    Hillary does not even know how to get coffee from the gas station. Watch the video from yesterday and you''ll be rolling on the ground.

    CBS is covering up Hillary''s Magnequench lie.
    Reply to this comment
    by lordmi May 1, 2008 7:30 PM EDT
    just by the way - there was NOT EVEN ONE, who switched from Obama to Clinton''s camp.

    Keep in mind.


    Reply to this comment
    by memekiller May 1, 2008 6:18 PM EDT
    This is the first time Hillary stying in made sense to me.

    Of course, all the reasons Obama is "unelectale" is trumped up nonsense, but the danger of Obama''s campaign is the double standard -- he wants to appeal to our better angels, whereas Clinton doesn''t pretend to be anything but the devil. For Obama to hit back will be portrayed as hypocrisy, in stark contrast to Nicholas Kristof and others'' rationalizations of all of McCain''s flip-flopping and cynicism.
    Reply to this comment
    by texaslj May 1, 2008 5:16 PM EDT
    May 1, 2008, Today Show:
    "Obama knows why he%u2019s attracted the attacks. ''Here I am. An African-American named Barack Obama who''s running for president,'' he said with a chuckle. ''I mean, that''s a leap for folks.''"

    He is so out of touch it''s downright frightening.
    Reply to this comment
    by rowdytexan2 May 1, 2008 4:57 PM EDT
    Posted by realpatriot1 at 12:22 PM : May 01, 2008

    Where do you drive your car? To the post office and back?

    There are hundres of people in Texas rural areas community to work and independent trucking families all over the US that can use as much as a 25 cent reducation on gas prices for a few months!

    City people don''t have a clue when they drive a few blocks every day!
    Reply to this comment
    by rowdytexan2 May 1, 2008 4:54 PM EDT
    "Another %u201CJudas?%u201D Former Clinton friends and associates are bailing out all over the place."

    What a bunch of bull! ROFL! Only an Obama honker could come up with krap like this!
    Reply to this comment
    by realpatriot1 May 1, 2008 3:22 PM EDT
    I''m struggling to keep gas in my car but I''m not stupid enough to not see through this election year stunt.

    Beyond the fact that the savings are minimal for an individual family, it''s not without cost, and not just to the government.

    Less money for roads equals contruction delays equals less hiring plus more gridlock. More gridlock means more gas consumed equals even higher prices.

    We need a PERMANENT solution in the form of confronting pricing! It was just reported yesterday that supplies are way up while the prices continue to climb.

    The oil companies and the politicians who love them(McCain & Clinton both receive substantially more thn Obama) want you to ignore prices and concentrate on taxes so you''ll blame the government and not theem.

    Hillary says her plan is paid for with windfall profits from the oil companies. Another Bosnian-style fantasy.

    There is no windfall profits tax and there won''t be during this year when this is supposed to happen. It will be next spring at the earliest before a new Congress can take up any budget proposals of the next President.
    Reply to this comment
    by blkpresident May 1, 2008 3:11 PM EDT
    Somewhere in NY a kitchen stove needs a woman''s touch. Where''s lil'' Hillary? Still criss crossing the nation pipe dreaming about a woman becoming president. Somebody please tell lil'' missy that terrorist don''t play SOFTball or powder-puff football.
    Reply to this comment
    See all 29 Comments

    About Horserace

    Description for Horserace

    Add to your favorite news reader
    google
    yahoo
    msn
    • MOST POPULAR
    Discussed
    1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

      (340 recent comments)