Horserace
February 29, 2008 5:19 PM

Obama Responds To Provocative Clinton Spot

Hillary Clinton's campaign released a provocative ad earlier today in Texas asking the question: When your children are asleep at 3 am and a phone is ringing in the White House, who do you want picking up the phone?

"Your vote will decide who answers that call," an announcer said in the ad, which you can watch here. "Whether it's someone who already knows the world's leaders, knows the military, someone tested and ready to lead in a dangerous world."

Now the Obama campaign has released a response to the Clinton spot. Using a similar setup – the 3 am phone call, the children asleep – the ad makes this argument:
When that call gets answered, shouldn’t the president be the one – the only one – who had judgment and courage to oppose the Iraq war from the start… Who understood the REAL threat to America was al-Qaeda, in Afghanistan, not Iraq. Who led the effort to secure loose nuclear weapons around the globe… In a dangerous world, it’s judgment that matters.
Watch it below:

Tags:
baack obama ,
phone call ,
ad ,
hillary clinton ,
3 am ,
children sleeping ,
phone
Topics:
Barack Obama
Add a Comment See all 40 Comments
by minnick8-2009 March 3, 2008 1:58 PM EST
When the phone rings in the White House, no matter what time it is, I would prefer that it be John McCain who answers.
Reply to this comment
by jerryz7936 March 3, 2008 6:05 AM EST
Clinton people are in denial.

What was the tune for that song in the wizard of oz?

Ding dong the witch is dead?
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 2, 2008 9:35 PM EST
And his whole campaign, if Hillary didn''t say it or put it in a plan first, Obama hasn''t a clue what the hell he''s talking about unless it''s put on a teleprompter for him!
Reply to this comment
by rowdytexan2 March 2, 2008 9:34 PM EST
Whatta dummy! He criticizes her, then puts out the exact same add!

And we''re tired of hearing the FAIRY TALE about you opposing the war! You made one speech! Big deal! Lots of people made speeches! But those voting had to consider the will of the people at the time, and consider that we''d just had a catastrophic attack!

Obama is a total fruit loop claiming grandeur he doesn''t posses!
Reply to this comment
by hill4change March 2, 2008 6:18 PM EST
Obama is neglecting his duties in the job he was elected for in order to pursue a more powerful job. His surrogates point out that it''s the freshman Senator from Illinois'' judgement, that we took our eyes off the prize by going in to Iraq, as the justification for his elevation to the Presidency. I agree that we let Bin Laden off the hook by neglecting Afghanistan and going into Iraq. He is neglecting his position as Chair of the Sub-committee that oversees NATO''s activities in Afghanistan. This is tremendously important to the security of this country, but he has yet to chair a single meeting (since Jan. 2007, when he assumed the Chair) in his pursuit of higher office. If he doesn''t take this job seriously, what assurances do we have that he will take the position of the Presidency seriously?

The only thing of substance that obama says is when he says he agrees with Senator Clinton. My husband calls him oblahblah because he never says anything of substance (my husband is a Vietnam Veteran and a member of MENSA). My husband''s question is, "Where''s the Beef?" Where''s the plan, besides agreeing with Senator Clinton?
Reply to this comment
by hill4change March 2, 2008 6:15 PM EST
Obama is neglecting his duties in the job he was elected for in order to pursue a more powerful job. His surrogates point out that it''s the freshman Senator from Illinois'' judgement, that we took our eyes off the prize by going in to Iraq, as the justification for his elevation to the Presidency. I agree that we let Bin Laden off the hook by neglecting Afghanistan and going into Iraq. He is neglecting his position as Chair of the Sub-committee that oversees NATO''s activities in Afghanistan. This is tremendously important to the security of this country, but he has yet to chair a single meeting (since Jan. 2007, when he assumed the Chair) in his pursuit of higher office. If he doesn''t take this job seriously, what assurances do we have that he will take the position of the Presidency seriously?

The only thing of substance that obama says is when he says he agrees with Senator Clinton. My husband calls him oblahblah because he never says anything of substance (my husband is a Vietnam Veteran and a member of MENSA). My husband''s question is, "Where''s the Beef?" Where''s the plan, besides agreeing with Senator Clinton?
Reply to this comment
by shadowmann1 March 2, 2008 5:05 PM EST
Hilarious and revealing. Bill Clinton campaigns against the very tactics his wife uses:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Qe0BPwWAxnk
Reply to this comment
by libra127 March 2, 2008 5:00 PM EST
Posted by b-easy63 at 11:26 PM : Mar 01, 2008

The point is not whether or not it is plagerism. The point is if Clinton''s ad is regarded as "fear-mongering", then Obama is just as guilty of "fear mongering" since his ad is almost exactly the same as Hillary''s.
Reply to this comment
by abbe91 March 2, 2008 2:14 PM EST
"If we are to believe her ad, then John McCane should be answering that phone. She really is running an inane strategy.
Posted by Policrypt at 03:56 PM : Mar 01, 2008"

Let me elaborate on the spelling.
Actually, instead of voting McCain, write-in John McClane:

http://radioactiveliberty.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/mcclain01.jpg
Reply to this comment
by laurenbrillante March 2, 2008 12:28 PM EST
Please check your facts about Senator Barack Obama on his website.
I feel that Senator Clinton failed the ''''''''test'''''''' when she voted to give President Bush authority to go to war in Iraq. In my years of watching and interacting with congress I have never observed that Senator Clinton ever did or said anything that made me think she would make a good president... in fact she had left me unimpressed in every way. She has exhibited poor judgement in the way she has conducted her campaign. And now not only do I feel she should NOT be president but I have lost respect for her.
I am an educated, single, caucasian, 44 yr old, mother, and small business owner in Colorado. From the first time I heard Senator Obama I could see that he has extraordinary, natural leadership skills, integrity, honesty, and wisdom. I believe that he has the potential to become one of the greatest leaders of our time. Senator Obama is an incredible orator and very inspiring but he is also VERY SUBSTANTIVE. He is the one I want protecting our national security 24/7. He has MORE legislative ''''''''EXPERIENCE'''''''' than Senator Clinton.
I do not have any delusions about how challenging it may be to get our country back on track...this is why we NEED HOPE and why we HAVE TO BELIEVE AND SAY "YES WE CAN!"
Reply to this comment
by dovesong-2009 March 2, 2008 12:25 PM EST
I am tired of all the squabbling. I support REAL change.. Hill and Bill have ALREADY been in the whitehouse! I am fed up with them and their "machine". That is what we are sick of... the "machine" oriented politics. Please go away, Hillary!
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 March 2, 2008 12:13 PM EST
Hilary will be ready to lead on Day 1--just like she was ready to campaign and implode the Dem. Party since Day 1. LOL
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 March 2, 2008 12:12 PM EST
FOR A MAN WHO SAYS HES THE ONE TO GET THE JOB DONE HES FAILED TO CHANGE A THING WHEN HE HAD THE CHANCE TOO AGAIN HES MISSING IN ACTION ON AN ISSUE HE HAS STATED OVER AND OVER IS AN IMPORTANT ISSUE.


Posted by girlinvt at 12:54 AM : Mar 02, 2008


Hmmmmm. Whereas Hilary did what? Voted to expand FISA, and also voted to NOT restrict torture? yes...we can see how Hilary and her policies helped to keep the bushman''s game afloat--but tell us--how did it help America or the Dem Party? LOL
Reply to this comment
by girlinvt-2009 March 2, 2008 3:54 AM EST
Ring,Ring,Ring it''s 3 am and the red phone is ringing in the White house and has been ringing now for over 12 months,it''s the American troops in Afganistan trying to find the chairman of the senate commitee in charge of the combined European forces defending against the spread of Al Qaida and the Taliban in Afganistan.Seems to me the great and oh so awsome Obama has grown deaf to the ringing of this phone.HIS RED PHONE MOMENT MISSED BECAUSE HE WAS JUST TO BUSY... FOR A MAN WHO SAYS HES THE ONE TO GET THE JOB DONE HES FAILED TO CHANGE A THING WHEN HE HAD THE CHANCE TOO AGAIN HES MISSING IN ACTION ON AN ISSUE HE HAS STATED OVER AND OVER IS AN IMPORTANT ISSUE.

Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 March 2, 2008 2:26 AM EST
If Obama touts Clinton''''''''s ad as fear-mongering, why did he put out almost exactly the same ad in response? Couldn''''''''t think up anything better? Another case of plagarism? Or just can''''''''t answer anything in his own words? "Yes, Sen. Clinton is right" "I agree with Hillary".
Nothing but an empty suit with a double standard.


----------------------------------
----------------------------------------
------

Posted by NickSP2 at 10

I don''t think we want to accuse Obama of plagarizing that commercial--considering Clinton LIFTED it from words to visuals from the Mondale campaign tv ads of the 1970s. LMAO If anyone plagarized--it would be clinton--and maybe then Obama capitalized on her plagerism. LOL
Reply to this comment
by b-easy63 March 2, 2008 2:24 AM EST
February 29, 2008
Pregnant Pause

It was, in this reporter''s opinion, the most interesting moment in today''s Clinton campaign phoner with reporters. Responding to the release of HRC''s new TX TV ad, which asserts in no subtle terms that only she has the experience to deal with a major world crisis, and, relatedly, to keep your children safe, Slate''s John Dickerson asked the obvious question:

"What foreign policy moment would you point to in Hillary''s career where she''s been tested by crisis?" he said.

Silence on the call. You could''ve knit a sweater in the time it took the usually verbose team of Mark Penn, Howard Wolfson and Lee Feinstein, Clinton''s national security director, to find a cogent answer. And what they came up with was weak -- that she''s been endorsed by many high ranking members of the uniformed military.

Take a listen ...

Reply to this comment
by last1whoknew March 2, 2008 2:24 AM EST
on another topic though. some people realy love the idea of so called "change" in Washington. If you have all forgotten or in most cases the more likely response in "too young to know" the just check out the facts of Jimmy Carter''s "change" when elected and look at how disastrous his presidency was. Facts are you have to work in the walls of Washington if your going to be successful in power.
Reply to this comment
by last1whoknew March 2, 2008 2:19 AM EST
I''m confused by all the hoopla. Obviously another post has been hiden by the media once again. take a peak and decide for your self. http://www.evtv1.com/player.aspx?itemnum=10844
not sure what to think
Reply to this comment
by laffincrow March 2, 2008 2:14 AM EST
http://www.mediatakeout.com/22003/wow_barack_obamas_new_ad_uses_bill_clinton_against_hillary.html

Enough Said
Reply to this comment
by laffincrow March 2, 2008 2:13 AM EST
http://www.mediatakeout.com/22003/wow_barack_obamas_new_ad_uses_bill_clinton_against_hillary.html

Enough Said! Go Obama!
Reply to this comment
See all 40 Comments

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn