Horserace
December 3, 2007 5:06 PM

Edwards Campaigns In Iowa, Guns No Longer Blazing

From CBS News' Aaron Lewis, on the campaign trail with John Edwards:

(AP)
Just a couple weeks ago, John Edwards was waist deep in a war of words with Sen. Hillary Clinton. But now that Sen. Barack Obama is upping his public challenges to Clinton, Edwards has stepped to the side to act as a casual – and even an amused – observer.

Take, for example, the spat between Clinton and Obama in which Clinton’s campaign said that, contrary to his claims, Obama’s presidential ambitions were evident as far back as his days in elementary school -- when he wrote an essay about wanting to be president.

“The Clinton and Obama sniping over the last 24 hours is really fascinating to listen to,” said a tongue-in-cheek Edwards at a community meeting in Waterloo, IA today. “I want to confess to all of you right now. In third grade I wanted to be two things: I wanted to be a cowboy, and I wanted to be Superman.”

And last night at an event in Mason City, IA, Edwards addressed the issue with the same mocking tone.

“I think it’s fine to talk about, you know, our records and about issues,” he told the audience. “But I think we probably ought to stop maybe at age fourteen.”

It’s a curious change of tune from a candidate whose campaign was responsible for coining the phrases “Politics of Parsing” and “Plants for Hillary” in the first half of November. The rhetoric was so heated, in fact, that Edwards was charged with mudslinging by the Clinton campaign.

But though he says nothing has changed in his campaign, Edwards' rhetoric toward his opponents has noticeably dulled since Thanksgiving. And he’s even been quick to criticize the "bickering” between his opponents as “a bunch of nothing.”

“American people could care less about watching politicians fight with each other,” Edwards told New Hampshire voters in Manchester last week. “I mean really, how long have we been watching politicians fight? It’s meaningless.”

Today, Edwards was asked if he benefits from the fighting between Obama and Clinton. And while he did not directly answer that question, he hinted at the motivation behind his turn from sniper to spectator.

“I don’t think America benefits from any personal fighting between candidates,” responded Edwards. “I think [voters] want to see us behave in a presidential way, especially as we get this close to the caucus.”
Tags:
john edwards ,
negative campaigning ,
barack obama ,
hillary clinton
Topics:
John Edwards
Add a Comment
by kansas1946 December 4, 2007 12:50 AM EST
Take, for example, the spat between Clinton and Obama in which Clinton%u2019s campaign said that, contrary to his claims, Obama%u2019s presidential ambitions were evident as far back as his days in elementary school -- when he wrote an essay about wanting to be president.
************************

LMAO. Hillary''s campaign must really be getting desparate to go back to a paper someone wrote in grade school. I imagine about 50pct of American kids at one time though it would be cool to be president. Hillary, this is beneath you, and makes you look like a fool, which you are not.
Reply to this comment
by avraamjack December 4, 2007 2:47 AM EST
It is possible that Senator Clinton is the best candidate. However, even though many may like the policies that Senator Clinton proposes, they should also consider her record, just as Senator Clinton insists.
.
The last Clinton Administration, when faced with the fact that protection rackets where assaulting, torturing and murdering people with poison and radiation, chose to avoid its responsibilities to incarcerate the criminals and to protect the citizenry.
.
Instead, they made a deal with the criminal gang stalker protection rackets to leave them alone and to consequently abandon the citizenry.
.
Do we want a President who sells out the citizenry for votes?
.
Do we want a President who sends a "crime does pay" message to society?
.
Would you vote for a President who signed nonaggression deals with the KKKlan or the Nazi party? Gangs that torture with poison and radiation are much like the KKKlan and Nazi Party.
.
We do not need a sellout President. We need a principled leader President.
.
If you are one of the few who do not know what the above refers to, do a web search for %u201Cgang stalking%u201D to see the tip of the dirtberg. Please do it before you decide to reply to my post. Here let me make it easy for you: http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=%22gang+stalking%22.
.



Reply to this comment
by runningralph December 4, 2007 10:26 AM EST
John Edwards is the best choice for the democrats. Hillary and Barak are not credible.
Reply to this comment
by mlkoncbs December 4, 2007 12:44 PM EST
Why is CBS so anti-Edwards? Why do you keep trying to convince us he''s phony? I really suspect some strong, strong H. Clinton supporters making the decisions in your news organization.
Reply to this comment
by jlm0212 December 4, 2007 1:57 PM EST
I live in North Carolina and the only thing one term Senator Edwards has done for this state is run for president. Now he is once again beginning to position himself as a Vice-Presidential candidate. He doesn''t want to serve the people, he only wants power. If he were interested in serving the people, he would have done more for the citizens on NC. Look people, NC was a red state in the last election. We didn''t want him to be president, why would you?
Reply to this comment

About Horserace

Description for Horserace

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
  • Viewed
  • Commented