Public Eye
May 30, 2007 12:02 PM

Hurricane Hugo

(AP)
The bulging ranks of cable news critics saw their ranks grow by another member yesterday: None other than Venezuelan President Hugo Chavez. Welcome, El Presidente. Now settle down.

According to various news reports, Chavez – who has already has shut down one popular TV network, with another in his crosshairs – announced he is going to sue CNN International for placing his image next to Osama bin Laden during a recent news package.
[Venezuelan] Information Minister, William Lara, showed a press conference what he said was CNN footage of Mr. Chavez juxtaposed with images of Osama bin Laden, saying: “CNN broadcast a lie which linked President Chavez to violence and murder." He also accused CNN of dishonesty for using footage of a Mexican demonstration in a story about the current Venezuelan disturbances.
CNN has already aired a correction and apologized for the Mexican footage, adding that it is not “engaged in a campaign to discredit or attack Venezuela.” To the contrary, CNN was actually singled out for praise by Hugo Chavez in 2003, when he lauded their coverage of his standing up to a coup. (A coup fomented, in part, by the Radio Caracas Television network he just took off the air.)

But as far as the practice of placing Chavez’s image next to bin Laden is concerned, CNN is defending itself. And rightfully so.
[CNN International VP Tony] Maddox said that “unrelated news stories can be juxtaposed in a given segment of television news in the same way that a newspaper page or a website can have news items with no relation to each other placed side by side".
According to all the news reports examined by Public Eye, at no point in the on-air comments were the two leaders identified as partners or friends – they were merely names in the news. Additionally, the fact that they are globally known for their distaste for America makes the side-by-side positioning even more justifiable.

A few years ago, I was on CNN discussing the lack of coverage given to the civil war in Congo. Watching the tape later, I noticed that at one point the caption underneath my face read “Does Anybody Care?” Not the sort of message I wanted attached to my image, but this sort of thing happens.

Like many media critics, Hugo Chavez sees a political agenda where there probably isn't one. He is taking on the media in his homeland with a singular zest that troubles everyone from the U.S. Senate to Amnesty International, and now he's attacking one-time friend CNN for simple nonthreatening visual shorthand. Were Chavez a blogger or a dissident, it would be easier to dismiss his views. But given that he’s the President of Venezuela and in the middle of a wholesale repudiation of a free press in his country, the fact that he’s taking on an American-based media corporation may be the wake-up call we need to take a closer look at what’s happening below the equator -- and under our noses.
Tags:
Hugo Chavez ,
CNN International ,
Osama Bin Laden ,
media ,
journalism
Topics:
In The News
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by ronmwanga May 31, 2007 2:48 AM EDT
Isn't it amazing that Chavez came to the United States, to the UN's main headquarters, to issue an ad hominem attack against President Bush, and then -- irony of ironies! -- he goes gonzo when faced with the slightest internal dissent on the media in his own country, reverting to totalitarian type. Whether Charlie Rangel, or William Buckley, I think we are all -- right, left, center -- on the same "Won't you Shut up, Hugo Chavez" page here.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 30, 2007 5:55 PM EDT
The problem with a socialist government is maintaining complete control over everything. Not allowing free market creativity, expressing, and thought are detrimental to its own cause. In the same respect on the other side of the scale fascist control over the working class has the same disadvantageous effect.

I see only one parameter that is constant to the hate coming from the American Right Wing in regard to Hugo Chavez and that would be his vast oil reserve and the manner in which he has attempted to leverage his country's position on the world market. You must admit Chavez coming from a leftist socialist regime is playing hardball as a real capitalist.

Thanx for the Enlightment.
Reply to this comment
by one_american May 30, 2007 5:31 PM EDT
"What is the real obsession with Hugo Chavez and Venezuela?"

So, obviously you see nothing wrong with a Liberal Dictator squashing democracy, private industry, and the free press in Venezuela.

Maybe liberals in America care nothing about what Hugo does, but simply have an obsession for him because of what he says.

Maybe it's because he quotes Noam Chomsky.

And, F.Y.I.: the word is "enlighten".
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 30, 2007 5:11 PM EDT
Keep the blinders on. You'll make a fine (and obedient) jackass for Hugo.

Inlighten me, since I'm already an obedient US resident of George Bush. What is the real obsession with Hugo Chavez and Venezuela?

Reply to this comment
by one_american May 30, 2007 5:01 PM EDT
Mattcat25:

Keep the blinders on. You'll make a fine (and obedient) jackass for Hugo.
Reply to this comment
by mattcat25 May 30, 2007 4:42 PM EDT
I don't understand what the obsession is with people on the right wing (like the reverend Pat Robertson) and Hugo Chavez. Citco has supplied the United States with much needed oil for over half a century. Last year Chavez supplied low cost heating oil for needy people in the northeast, he also was one of the first donators to the Katrina Disaster.

I'm not real familiar with how Chavez runs his country, nor how he treats his friends and family. But, in today's United States energy conundrum one would think that Venezuela would (could) be one of our strongest allies.

Right wing rumblings of socialism and evil dictators with oil begin to compare to the unreal threat from Saddam Hussein and the now occupied country of Iraq. Are Hugo Chavez and Venezuelan oil fields our next military conflict without reason and without end?
Reply to this comment
by one_american May 30, 2007 3:51 PM EDT
"...we need to take a closer look at what%u2019s happening below the equator -- and under our noses."

Hasn't it been obvious that the Liberal Dictator has been hell-bent on squashing democracy, private industry, and the free press in Venezuela?

This is what the world gets when liberals get their way.
Reply to this comment

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye

  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. Kennedy: Bishop Barred Me From Communion

    (340 recent comments)