Couric & Co.
January 10, 2007 8:49 AM

A REALLY Big Apple

(AP Photo/Paul Sakuma)
Correspondent John Blackstone got a glimpse of Apple executive Steve Jobs’ latest gizmo yesterday – and says it just might make history.



Watching Steve Jobs in action as a showman and a salesman is always impressive. Watching him introduce Apple’s new iPod/cellphone device, I thought Jobs seemed to revel in unveiling something that will drive competitors crazy.

I have attended several MacWorld conferences and Jobs’ keynote speech always follows the same format. The hall is packed with several thousand Mac enthusiasts, tech analysts and news reporters. Rock music blares through the hall. A giant screen at the front carries the Apple logo.

To cheers, Jobs strides alone onto the stage, dressed in worn blue jeans and black turtleneck. Using a remote control and a laptop and apparently with no script, he demonstrates Apples’ latest advances in hardware and software. It is always a flawless performance, both humanly and technically. Then at the very end, when Jobs seems to have finished he pauses and says: “Oh, and one more thing.” The crowd cheers and applauds in anticipation. Then Jobs presents Apple’s biggest new product.

But this time, introducing Apple’s iPod/cellphone, Jobs didn’t wait until the end and “one more thing”. He said at the very top it was day that would make history. The device he unveiled -- and the crowd’s reaction -- showed that he might just be right.

It’s a slim aluminum and stainless steel cellphone, no buttons, just a huge (3.5 inch diagonal) screen. Everything works by just touching the screen with your fingers. It’s not just an iPod and a cellphone; it can also access “the real Internet” as Jobs put it. It is in fact a tiny computer, running a full version of Apple’s OS X operating system. It will carry photos and music, send and receive email. The internet looks exactly the same on Apple’s iPhone, as it does on a regular computer screen.

I think everybody in the hall watching Jobs show off the iPhone immediately wanted one. They won’t go on sale until June (and at $500) but there is little doubt that Jobs will meet his stated goal of selling 10 million of the phones in 2008.

Perhaps the most amazing thing about the iPhone is that Apple managed to keep it pretty much secret during two and a half years of development. There were rumors, of course, but nothing that really hinted at what a breakthrough this would be. Maybe one reason the rumors didn’t tell anything close to the whole story is that you have to see this phone, hold it in your hand, use it, to appreciate how very different it is. (You can a demo in the monitor on the left.)

Analysts repeatedly said Apple was so late getting into the cellphone business it could have a hard time catching up. But remember, there were plenty of MP3 players around when Apple introduced the iPod and iTunes but now iPod dominates the market.

Oh, and one more thing. Jobs announced that reflecting the company’s growth in music and the phone business it will now longer be known as Apple Computer. From now on it will just be Apple Inc.

Tags:
apple
Topics:
Field Notes
Add a Comment
by jcorbin1958 January 11, 2007 12:53 PM EST
Wouldn't have anything but Verizon.....
Reply to this comment
by jimlewis633 January 10, 2007 3:37 PM EST
Posters are forgetting that industry has generally followed Apple innovation, whenever it occurred, rather than led it. Chances are that with the infusion of capital caused by millions of people switching from Verizon or Sprint, Cingular will be able to (or forced to) upgrade its network. Or maybe they'll just keep the money. Anyway, the device itself looks to be awesome. It's like an M3, *** enough on the outside for the chicks, incredibly powerful under the hood for the dudes. I don't see a single feature on this phone that I wouldn't use every day.
Reply to this comment
by big_mig January 10, 2007 3:26 PM EST
I think there is little doubt that if iPhone is even half as successful as the iPod, Verizon and Sprint will come begging at Steve Jobs's door and throw a boatload of cash at Apple to develop a CDMA variant.

Of course, the CDMA will lag the GSM variant. But that is a fact of life for Verizon/Sprint customers - you're always getting "last year's phone" when you sign up with a CDMA carrier (it just hasn't mattered that much until now because the phones haven't been that compelling).
Reply to this comment
by nicemandan January 10, 2007 1:52 PM EST
Looks fantastic! One more thing though... how it going to look/function after 1 month in your pocket? Judging by the state of the screen on my iPod, not very good!
Reply to this comment
by WatchDog45 January 10, 2007 1:46 PM EST
The phone looks amazing but I will not own one due to his sole carrier agreement with Cingular. Unfortunate but true, beyond the cost, one of his limiting factors in gaining market share rapidly will be his carrier of choice. I have used them all and Cingular was one of my least favorite carriers. Contrary to their big ad campaign "The fewest dropped calls" they were by far the worst as far as coverage/signal strength and had the most dropped calls due to issues with tower to tower handoff. I could watch my signal drop as I approached the new cell tower, the signal would blip out, drop the call and then, bam your at 5 bars of signal strength. I thought it was my phone so I tried two more before I dumped Cingular and went with Verizon.
At any rate, its a very cool phone and I wish I could have one but Verizon would have been a better choice. I am guessing image was a big part of his choice of carriers and Verizon and Apple don't seem to fit.
Reply to this comment
by -hh January 10, 2007 1:41 PM EST
If you want a cell phone that you can use
anywhere then you'll use Verizon.

Verizon may be a big player within the USA, but CDMA isn't used in the bigger world outside: in the total worldwide market, GSM is dominant, not CDMA.

Insofar as performance within the USA, I currently have both a Verizon (personal) and a Cingular (business). I was initially concerned about coverage on GSM, but I've found there to be little real world difference within the USA.

The iPhone (as introduced) is a Quad-Band GSM that will work in Europe, Japan, the Mideast and (to whatever "lesser" degree) in the USA. As such, Apple has chosen to make a single product that will work in many markets worldwide.

Strategically, this move by Apple just might have the potential to tip the scales in the USA and cause significantly broader adoption of GSM, much to the dismay of Verizon and the installed base that they have in CDMA.

Competition is good, so it will be interesting to see where this leads.

Personally, I%u2019m fed up with my Verizon not working on vacations outside of the USA. As such, I expect that my next phone will be an unlocked and uncrippled GSM.


-hh
Reply to this comment
by bedney42 January 10, 2007 1:13 PM EST
george2221 -

I disagree - 2 reasons:

1. Something that no one has mentioned about this phone is that, because it has no buttons, its 'instantly reconfigurable' to any international market, who until now have been hobbled by the alphabet and keypad we use here in the States.

2. Maybe Jobs & Co. recognized that fact and made sure the phone used the 'GSM' digital standard, which most of the rest of the world has standardized on and which is (now) used by Cingular / AT&T. Verizon uses a different standard (CDMA).

So maybe in the U.S. only Apple fanboys (and fangirls) will buy this, but in overseas markets (where they use their cell phones for *everything* because they don't have pathetic coverage like we do here) I think he's gonna make *billions*.

Cheers,

- Bill
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Best-selling author Mitch Albom on his first nonfiction work since "Tuesdays with Morrie." Watch Now

About Couric & Co.

Go for a look behind the scenes at The CBS Evening News with Katie Couric for stuff we like and for surprises. It's also a place for you to post comments and join our conversation about the news.

Add to your favorite news reader
google
yahoo
msn
  • MOST POPULAR
Discussed
  1. House Passes Landmark Health Care Bill

    (478 recent comments)