Public Eye
November 14, 2006 2:31 PM

The Pelosi 'Honeymoon'

(AP Photo/J. Scott Applewhite)
Since the election, some observers have been complaining that Nancy Pelosi has been getting glowing coverage from the press. Media watcher Howard Kurtz, for example, has touched on this notion in both his Washington Post column and on his CNN talk show. Kurtz argues that Pelosi has been going through a "honeymoon" with the press corps, and fretting over whether she is "ever going to get the kind of tough press scrutiny that, for example, Newt Gingrich received when he became Speaker in 1995."

Let me take a stab at that one: Yes. And let me add, with all due respect: Duh. It's been about a week, and we're already seeing pieces criticizing Pelosi – such as this one chiding her for promoting Alcee Hastings to chair the House Intelligence Committee. There have been a bunch of glowing Pelosi profiles in the newspapers of late, but that's hardly a surprise, as (A) Pelosi is the first woman House speaker and (B) as Jack Shafer pointed out, reporters need to do a little beat-sweetening now that power has shifted. Even amid the post-election glow, it hasn't been all honeymoon: Though Pelosi has gotten more than her fair share of softball questions – I get it, she's a grandmother – she's also been repeatedly confronted about how she reconciles her harsh words about President Bush with her rhetoric concerning bipartisanship and civility.

I still remember the cover of Newsweek from Nov. 21, 1994, right after Republicans swept into office: It was a big headshot of a smiling Newt Gingrich, the words "Right Face" splashed across the page. Most of the early coverage of the "Republican Revolution" was pretty glowing, with many pieces focusing on the genius it took to take control of the House from the Democrats. As time passed, the pieces became more critical, just as they will with Pelosi. It's been a week, everyone. What say we take a breath?
Tags:
pelosi ,
kurtz
Topics:
Mega-Media Trends
Share:
  • Share
  • Yahoo! Buzz
  • Mixx
Add a Comment
by bmidji November 15, 2006 11:24 PM EST
Brian, while it is certainly true that a dramatic change in majority control in Congress deserves a breath for everyone to process What It All Means, and some dose of credit for the success for those who made a new majority, a deep reading of Gingrich vs. Pelosi here will not demonstrate fairness and balance in the media. The passage of time will only make the contrast more dramatic.

You may recall the "Right Face" cover of Newsweek, but ignore the Newsweek story in which the Gingrich caption is RADICAL GEEK, followed by the "Gingrich That Stole Christmas" cover. You probably shouldn't bet the meatball money on Pelosi getting slammed with the same intensity.

Tim G.
Reply to this comment
by vriss November 14, 2006 9:56 PM EST
More Republican sour grapes. Talk about sore losers! And, they didn't hesitate to rub our noses in their gloating whenever they were on top. Maybe they should try a little introspection to see why people are fed up with their politics.
Reply to this comment
by memekiller November 14, 2006 6:27 PM EST
Let me put it another way. Shouldn't you wait until Pelosi does something wrong before you rail her? And shouldn't you start reporting the Republican abuses, now that the voters sent a clear message to all the President's enablers that they want accountability back in government?
Reply to this comment
by memekiller November 14, 2006 6:10 PM EST
I totally agree. For instance, compare the Time Cover following the Republican Revolution, to the one this week: http://mediamatters.org/items/200611130001

The Democratic majority is larger than the Republicans in 1994, yet much of the media has spun this victory as vindication of centrism and conservative principles. Nevermind that many of those Democrats who won were progressives. As for the Press eventually scrutinizing Gingrich, there were quite a few years of investigations of Clinton's ethics before they thought to take a look at Gingrich's philandering and other improprieties. I would hate to see the media return to the same Dem focused scandal-mongering we saw when haircuts and land deals were front page stories for weeks and months and years, while stories of Republican malfeance were ignored. (John Solomon already has quite a track record of manufacturing scandal on Reid).

Bush got kid glove treatment for several years after the war; this Congress has engaged in numerous abuses of power and corruption. The American people sent a message that they want a check on those abuses. How about the media start holding the Republicans accountable, as Americans demanded, before you start turning your guns on Democrats?

If you do feel compelled to run with talk-radio fueled character assassinations, it's only fair that you implicate Republicans for any Democratic transgressions you report, as you did with Abramoff.
Reply to this comment

Exclusive Webshow

Mike Huckabee on GOP "rock stars," 2012, health care reform and more. Watch Now

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye

  • MOST POPULAR