Public Eye
December 15, 2005 9:00 AM

The DaVince-y Code

(CBS)
Rarely in most professions outside of the theater do superiors request that their employees color their hair gray or use an eyebrow pencil to create the appearance of forehead wrinkles. Unless you’re Vince Gonzales, who worked for a news director who suggested that he do both because he looked too young on camera. As a general assignment reporter based in Los Angeles who focuses on investigative reporting, Gonzales has had some other unique experiences and he shares some of them below by answering our questions and yours.

So, what do you do for a living?
I am a general assignment correspondent in our Los Angeles bureau. If anything happens in the Western U.S., Mexico, Alaska or Hawaii, there’s a chance I’ll be sent to cover it.

CBS has also allowed me to carve out a niche as an investigative reporter. Working with producer Barbara Pierce I’ve been able to uncover some fascinating stories that I’m very proud of. Basically, my job is to find stories or documents some people would prefer to keep hidden. Then we track them down to ask the questions they don’t want to answer.

Investigative stories can be complicated and take quite a bit of time. What ends up on the air is just a small portion of our research. We always end up with boxes of documents and supporting information. Thanks to that research, my friends tell me I’ve become a “jack of all trades.”

For example, over the years, I’ve learned way too much about how blood banks work, how anthrax vaccine is made, and how energy traders conduct business.

The best part about this kind of work is you’re usually out there on your own. On my wall is the favorite motto of an investigative reporter I worked with in Arizona, Rich Robertson. It reads: “There is no news where there are other reporters.”
What is not being covered enough at CBS News?
I have to echo my colleague Sharyl Attkisson. We could always do more original, investigative reporting. That’s what will differentiate us in a world of 24-hour news channels and internet news on demand.
What’s the strangest thing that has ever happened to you on the job?
There have been so many strange experiences. Covering the Michael Jackson trial was a six-month long strange trip. Nearly every day had its surreal moments. Off the air, I guess it would be when a local news director who told me I looked too young and that I should put powder in my hair to give it gray streaks and draw lines in eyebrow pencil on my forehead to simulate wrinkles. I declined, figuring I would get there soon enough.
If you had 10 broken fingers and no gas in the car, which colleague would you want to be there?
Any of our great CBS News producers, photojournalists or editors would do, but if I have to pick one person it would be producer Eleanore Vega. Whenever news breaks, people in our bureau turn to her to make the impossible happen. It doesn’t matter whether you’re facing off with Mexican police along the border, standing in the middle of a massive forest fire, or going undercover with a hidden camera … with Eleanore you know you’re going to get the story.
If you were not in news, what would you be doing?
I’ve been told by the subjects at the heart of some of our investigative pieces that I would have made a good cop or prosecutor. I’ll take that as a compliment.
What is the biggest change at CBS during the time you’ve been here?
That has to be the departure of Dan Rather from the anchor chair. When I decided at age 11 that I wanted to be a reporter, he was there. When I first became an intern at CBS News, he was there. And he was anchor when I became a correspondent. I was lucky enough to work for him and learn from him.
What are the last three books you’ve read or the last three movies you’ve seen?
I recently saw (and really enjoyed) the Johnny Cash biopic “Walk The Line.” I just finished reading “Brodie’s Report” by Jorge Luis Borges, “Year of The Hangman” by Glenn F. Williams and “Swords Against The Senate, The Rise of The Roman Army and The Fall of The Republic” by Erik Hildinger.
What is your first memory of TV News?
My first memory is watching the “CBS Evening News with Walter Cronkite” with my father. I also have a vivid memory of both my parents being glued to the TV as CBS covered the Watergate hearings.
Would you want your child to go into the news business?
I don’t have children yet, but if I do I’m not sure the news business as I know it will be around when they are old enough to consider it as a profession. Maybe the state of the news business will be better, but when I see the boom in celebrity news and cable channels devoting hours to stories that in the past didn’t even rate a mention, I worry the industry is not heading in the right direction.
Who is the most fascinating person you’ve covered and who is the biggest jerk?
The most fascinating person I ever covered was a man I never met. In fact, he died in Vietnam when I was 4 years old. His name was Michael Blassie and he was the “Unknown Soldier” from the Vietnam conflict. Our seven month CBS News investigation proved that for two decades the government hid the fact that it actually knew the identity of this Unknown Soldier. I was fortunate to get to know Michael through my research and from the many hours I spent talking to his family and fellow pilots. As the son of a career military man, I think what some government officials did to Michael and his family is reprehensible. I still have many questions for those officials … who may be the biggest jerks I’ve ever covered.
And finally, Ph47f3, posed this question in our comments section: “Most news tends to come from New York or Washington, with little daily hard news from the Western U.S. I know Vince is posted to the West Coast … Does he think that the CBS “Evening News” shows enough news for the Western U.S.?”
I actually think the West is well-represented on CBS News broadcasts. When there is a story of national significance, it’s covered by the Los Angeles bureau. There are plenty of nights on the CBS “Evening News” where there are two or three pieces from the West. We also tend to do at least one or two pieces nearly every day for “The Early Show.”

CBS has also tailored broadcasts to Western viewers. For example, producers in New York have updated the West Coast feed of the “Evening News” by providing extended coverage of events like the California recall election. Other times they’ve replaced stories that aired in the East with pieces focused on the West for that feed.




Tags:
vince gonzales ,
10 plus 1
Topics:
10 Plus 1
Add a Comment
by smickelson1 December 16, 2005 3:48 PM EST
Vaughn Not a single post has been personal, they are simply factual. If you deem providing factual reference to CBS's own published material and pointing out published material concerning a subject of your original post "angry" or "personal" that would be your "subjective" view - true. All I would say is in the same vein is that Mary Mapes, Dan Rather and others I am sure have the same view of the people who "attacked" them on what I am sure they would consider "personal" and "angry. That similar view although "subjective" would be nothing less than BS and CYA. Keep up the good work, but try and be a little less of a protector of CBS employees "personal" feelings and more of a vanguard of Public Eye's purpose and mission. Vince I am sure is a seasoned "tough" investigative reporter as your post said who should and can defend himself and his work without your assistance. Public Eye readers would get some true "transparency" into the "news business" if he did so. I always invite an open public "robust debate" based on true provable facts. So should you.
Reply to this comment
by v_ververs December 16, 2005 12:36 PM EST
smickelson1 Your posts yesterday were removed because they were identical to previous comments you have left and your attacks have become increasingly personal in nature. For the record, our rules of engagement state: "Yes, what is not allowable is subjective. Public Eye and CBSNews.com absolutely reserve the right to remove posts we think break any of the rules or the spirit of the rules and we reserve the right to ban individuals from commenting. We will use language filtering programs to block certain words and we will use human editing too. Comments should be limited to the topic of the original Public Eye posting and should always be discussions about news, journalism, public affairs, and politics -- public things." We will continue to excercise our right. We encourage a substantive dialogue -- substantive. Unfortunately your personal and angry attacks do not foster such a dialogue, they discourage it.
Reply to this comment
by smickelson1 December 16, 2005 3:06 AM EST
Also it does seem you are a bit short of posts and comment here .. so I am sure its not for "bandwith" space that my previous post was removed. Come on Public Eye .... don't play dirty and censor legitimate posts to this forum .. it's beneath you. I know you aspire to higher "journalistic" ideals! Or at least I hope you do!
Reply to this comment
by smickelson1 December 16, 2005 3:01 AM EST
I would like to point Public Eye readers to Mr. Gonzales public bio posted on the CBS news site: http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2002/10/08/eveningnews/main524826.shtml Which states clear states Gonzales was and is a product of the CBS News Minority Training Program. As I said before I thought CBS would be proud to tout the sucess of such a journalistic "affirmative action" program designed to train young "minority reporters" who have successfully advanced at CBS News via the program. Also - for more info about Vince and his producer Barbara Pierce (who Vince refers to in his answers to the 10 and 1 -- take a look at this on Newsbusters.org: "An Undeserved Honor for CBS's Gonzales" http://newsbusters.org/node/291 A bit of a different take than the "glowing" PR release like bio posted on Public Eye. I hope Public Eye doesn't remove this post as it did my last. It adheres to its own "rules of engagement" concerning a strictly factual post which is clearly part of a "robust debate" Now if the the CBS News bosses say otherwise ( I understand) and reguire you to remove this post -- that's OK ( well, not really) but have the guts to inform Public Eye readers via your much ballyhooed "transparency" as to why you did so.
Reply to this comment

About Public Eye

Description for Public Eye