12 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
luvg-d says:
A man can't give birth to a baby. It takes a man and woman to conceive the baby and the woman carries the baby until it is born.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
dirtydog1776 says:
Boy, are these kids going to grow up very confused. I am sure we shall hear from them in the near future.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Aussie_Mum says:
I think its wonderful what Thomas is doing for he's wife,They love each other so much.In my book it dosent matter that Thomas was born a woman than became a man,if chooses to live that way its he's life in my opinion let them be.Thomas and Nancy congratulations on your baby and i hope you both have many more.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
anjs24 says:
Seriously, why does it matter so much to you guys if he calls himself a man or woman. It doesnt hurt you to call him a man like he wishes to be call. It doesnt change your life or even affected it. And to assume that his children will need "help" when their older is stupid, a lot of heterosexual couples mess up their children lives. I glad that their third child is healthy.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
oldlady-1016 says:
Sorry...but once again you have it wrong. It's not a pregnant "Man" and no matter how you try to spin it, it will never be so. These are sick and self absorbed human beings who have no regard for the children they are bringing into this world. It's not for love of the babies, but love of themselves. There oughta be a law.....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MariaB09 says:
Can we PLEASE stop calling this person a "Pregnant Man"????? She was born a WOMAN...chose to undergo gender alteration...and while physically may APPEAR to be a man...still has the internal female reproduction organs. A man can not get pregnant. Plain and simple.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
sam_james-2009 says:
I find it unconscionable that the news media is so quick to reclassify gender, when an operation 'does not a person make'. No matter how we may think we are manipulating sex, the reality is that the plumbing and mental imprinting that goes along with the entire package cannot be changed because of a surgeon's scalpel. This person is not a woman and never will be, no matter what medical manipulation takes place. News media: Call it what it is.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
rf35 says:
Since I read about this person getting pregnant on this site before, the shock fator from the headline wasn't there this time. Mrs. Beatie can have all the surgery she wants, but as long as the plumbing is there, she's a female. In fact, even if the plumbing was removed, she still would not be a man; at best she'd be a genderless "it." Hormones, hair, and lack of breasts do not make one a man.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
kamikaziii says:
I'm extremely happy this baby was born healthy considering all the risk associated with continuously conceiving after giving up the "femininity" that is required for a relatively effortless birth. This child is unfortunately never going to have a static male role model to understand it's OWN body, as this woman is still TRYING to learn herself. God help these psychologists who are stuck trying to help these miscreants that waste public resources trying to swim against natures current...
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Kristina Evans says:
I do not understand!! Technically he is a female with out breast and has facial hair! He is not a man!!! What is the big deal?
reply
1/2