15 Comments Add a Comment
linkicon reporticon emailicon
carlocaraluzzo69 says:
Im sorry, how is ANY of this MEXICO?S fault? Its American economic black mail that forces the Mexican Government to pass antiquated drug laws in some misguided American drug war, America sends thousands of military grade weapons as a gift to the Cartels and you are threatening Mexico? You need to get your beer swilling, tobacco chewing butt up to DC and complain to your ruling "white guys", who are in the pockets of the alcohol and pharmacuetcal industries and being controlled by protestant fundamentalists.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
whiteguysrule says:
yea mexico grow up or die.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
myth1958 says:
This is little more than closing the barn door after the bull has escaped. The earlier message to the cartels: "We'll help supply top-end weapons to you in your slaughtrer of everyone in Mexico" overshadows the belated "Hey! You killed our guy, so we're cracking down!" message. It makes you wonder where their priorities (and heads) are: would they have let a suitcase nuke 'walk' so they could follow the radioactive fingerprint to a destroyed city? Would they have allowed anti-aircraft missiles to 'walk' so they could pick up the serial numbers on it after thugs shot down an airliner? Where do they stand? They react to their own stupid moves rather than acting forceful in the first place. Makes you think someone high up got a bribe to let all that brand new hardware through, and now they're sopping up the results with a hankie of regret. Pshaw.
reply
CarloCaraluzzo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Do you really think this was an accident? Do you really think that people with that much experience in law enforcement would have made the series of decisions that led to this?
Go to ithinkrevolution.com and read the entire sad story.
linkicon reporticon emailicon
babooph says:
Wow victory in the hispanic America drug war[well just more media lies-the drug stuff will not miss one step....]
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
CarloCaraluzzo says:
"We know who you are and we are coming for you". First of all, straight from an Rambo movie. Give me a freaking break. Second of all, if they knew enough about their locations to arrest 200 people in a few days, my question is: Why did you not arrest them BEFORE?
Couple of other questions. Why would the drug cartels kill an ICE agent? No a DEA, FBI, or ATF agent, all of the agencies who deal with narcos, but a IMMIGRATION agent? And finally, what was a US Immigration agent doing "On Duty" several hundred miles deep into Mexico? Hot pursuit maybe? Or are we blurring jurisdictional lines?
People who make statements, school yard bully statements, like the ones above really have zero understanding exactly who they are dealing with.
In his book 1984 the author explains that one way governments use to distract voters from digging too deep is to keep them distracted with one endless war after another against invisible enemies. We at ithinkrevolution.com think it is curious the the drug cartels had no power or money until the early 1980?s when Reagan declared his "War on Drugs" and they suddenly, within a year or so,amazingly, they all became millionaires with military weapons. Now keep in mind that these are the same people who recruited and trained Al Quada.
Now, 25 years later, who are our main enemies? Rich and powerful drug cartels and a huge terrorist organization, BOTH created from US Government policy.
Are we there yet? Is is time to start asking questions about all these "coincidences"?
Sound familiar?
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
jackp32 says:
Why is it that the only time the U.S. gov't enforces laws that apply to illegals is after someone of importance is murdered? We are a reactionary nation.
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
morris2196 says:
A drug addict will purchase drugs if they are available. This is especially true of the more strongly addictive drugs (e.g., heroine, rock cocaine, powder cocaine and meth). Another issue is that it is not possible to physically prevent the smuggling of drugs into the US. It seems to me that the only solution to the drug problem is to deter people from selling drugs at the street level (or higher). That can be done by executing several thousand drug traffickers every month until deterrence has been established. That will solve the problem. It will be a horrifying sight to see, but the drug problem in the US is more horrible.
reply
CarloCaraluzzo replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yeah, that works really well in Afghanistan where 80% of the worlds herion comes from and they execute them if they catch them. Really effective it is.
Your just a serial killer looking for more thrills. And of course someone addicted to drugs is much more horrible then publically executing several thousand people a month.
You must be from Texas. Dont THEY hold the current world record for public executions? See how low the crime rate is in TEXAS?
linkicon reporticon emailicon
MissMeYetAbdullah says:
Let's go right to the source and nuke the bastids that sell them weapons and buy their filthy....

....uh, wait a minute, forget...forget I said anything.....
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
amerilatino says:
Thats right America, speak FORCEFULLY (right before you light up your doobies and crack pipes).
reply
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Clouseau2 says:
For every person you arrest, there are two more waiting to take their place. Want to send a real message to the cartels? Legalize marijuana, for starters. That will actually have an effect.
reply
jahjdh replies:
linkicon reporticon emailicon
Yes to pot and 3 quarters of our problem will be gone. Meth is a drug though,lock them up!
1/2
Scroll Left Scroll Right