Comments on: Trayvon Martin gun range targets were sold online "to make money off the controversy," report says
Add a Comment
- I thought the skittles and iced tea were a nice touch.
I'd like to score one of these to hang in my bar! - Reply to this comment
- Where was the outrage when these shirts got printed up? Wait there was none, Because black people can use racist terms all day long, George Zimmerman wasnt even a "Cr@cker". What a joke all this is becoming, and all of you are feeding right into it...Fueling the fire. http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/03/new-puy-a-cracker-t-shirts-hits-the-florida-streets/
- Reply to this comment
- This story sounds like it could be a hoax.
The reporters apparently never saw any of the actual targets, just a graphic from an ad.
If the targets sold out in 2 days, they would would print more if the motivation was to make money. - Reply to this comment
- SOME PPL ARE SO IGNORANT. I HOPE AND PRAY THAT ONE DAY THIS IMAGE WILL NOT REPRESENT YOUR KID/S ONE DAY. AND I DON'T UNDERSTAND WHAT IS SO FUNNY ABOUT THIS. JUST STUPID AND IGNORANT PPL JUST TO MAKE SOME MONEY.
- Reply to this comment
- Racism is still alive and well business as usual with the crazies
- Reply to this comment
- Shameful.
- Reply to this comment
- FREEDOM OF SPEECH...loses again! Our society is becoming one of whiners, special interest and people that don't understand what Americans unalienable rights are. Good taste? unethical? sad? or sick? Who cares!-- all that matters is FREEDOM OF SPEECH is alive and well! GO USA!
- Reply to this comment
- This is just as despicable as what the media did with this story. They falsified information and evidence to vilify Zimmerman and exploit the story. They are just as guilty as the person that made these targets if not worse.
- Reply to this comment
- CBS has sunk to tabloid-level with this story.
The "main motivation was to make money off the controversy."
Sounds like the same motivation the media has for publishing stories like this. - Reply to this comment
- Incredibly tasteless.
- Reply to this comment
