Crimesider
Crimesider
Add a Comment
by TimB.MCSE November 3, 2009 10:47 PM EST
Can a title be more misleading...
Reply to this comment
by LloydWhereProhibited November 3, 2009 8:58 PM EST
I am a proponent for the law being meted out in an unbiased fashion. Although I am not anti-porn or anti-prostitution, I regard the pornography industry as enjoying "legal prostitution". That is, they get paid for having sex-but are not arrested for it. Isn't there clear evidence of that from their films, photos and pay checks? I'm not an attorney, but it seems to me that this evidence would be rock solid in court.
Is it more permissible to get paid for having sex in a film or photo studio than to go on Craigs List or from the street? WHAT IS THE DIFFERENCE?
If anyone ever gets arrested for "solicitation", they could very well use this argument.
The law is not being enforced in as uniform a way as it should be. Ms. Lindemulder should be arrested for prostitution along with countless others...ALL in the pornography business. OR decriminalize/regulate prostitution and then everyone will live under equal law in this regard.
Been meaning to send this to Guv Schwartzeneiger,as California is the capital of porn, but haven't gotten around to it yet.
Reply to this comment
by gettyleigh November 3, 2009 5:24 PM EST
I got three words . . . Jaqmie Lee Curtis. We all know how bad of a person she turned out to be. Get over it! Jesse James is a thug. You think the kid hanging around a bunch of bikers is a healthy environment for the kid? And for the people fretting about disease . . . you all need to get a life . . . you can catch your death from a hamburger or H1N1 these days. I think the only reason this article was printed was to get people to choose a side, and by throwing the more Wholesome, Sandra Bullock in the game, the argument has a sane choice. Neither Janine or Jesse have a leg to stand on of their own, when it comes down to being a quality parent. Typical CBS poke your nose into affairs that you have no business in fluff. You guys can't even be objective about a divorce and child custody story. Why take sides?
Reply to this comment
by momn8rx November 3, 2009 5:19 PM EST
Jesse left Janine when she was seven months pregnant and had nothing to do with Sunny for the first three years of her life. Likewise, the article fails to mention him turning her over to the IRS in an attempt to wiggle through his own tax quagmire.

Janine moved to Oregon to raise her kids in a "normal" home and environment; perhaps she'll continue on that path once the jail/halfway house time is done.

It's not as though her porn profession is a revelation; Jesse knew about it when he married and procreated with her. Cutting Janine out of her daughter's life will be a huge disservice for all involved; say and assume what you wish but know that she truly, deeply loves her kids.
Reply to this comment
by labiofus November 3, 2009 3:52 PM EST
You all are a bunch of hypocrites. Porn stars can't raise a kid? How many of you drink or do other 'street drugs', surf the porn SHE is producing/directing and then consider yourselves 'good' parents? How many of you have bought a sack of weed for yourself or a friend and have the audacity to look down your nose and judge other people. How many of you don't do any of that yet still neglect/abuse your kid anyhow? How many politicians or other people in a community that are regarded as 'upstanding' citizens go to their tax-payer paid condo and do a line off their mistress/girlfriend/hooker rear then go home to their families, yet 'you' will vote or cheer for them the next time they're in the lime light? Oh I forgot, YOU have NEVER done ANYTHING wrong. YOU judgemental hypocrits are worse than she will ever be.
Reply to this comment
by androidboy November 1, 2009 5:23 PM EST
I have worked in the production of pornography. I never once saw a handgun, or street drugs, or any of the things Jesse's talking about.
Street drugs. Like Jesse doesn't burn the fern.
Another thing...there's this premise: if he had stayed with Lindemulder (who was in this biz when she met him) then it would be OK for his daughter to be around all these bad things?
Reply to this comment
by Virgil-1 November 1, 2009 2:55 PM EST
Does poor Sandra stand a chance against the devil's crowd?
Reply to this comment
by ohboy231 November 1, 2009 2:54 PM EST
You lay down with dong, you get fleas. Jesse James and his ex-wife are equally unimpressive.
Reply to this comment
by jackp32 November 1, 2009 11:41 AM EST
Wow! That Lindemulder is some dish!
Reply to this comment
by Bookworm8571 November 1, 2009 10:15 AM EST
Sandra Bullock doesn't have custody rights here. Jesse James and Janine Lindemulder are the ones who are in court over THEIR daughter, Sunny, and Jesse is the one requesting that the court make orders over who Sunny will associate with when she is spending time with her mother. Sandra Bullock is simply an interested party as the child's stepmother, who is given certain rights by the child's father when she is living with them. Jesse has a right to ask that his wife have the right to discipline the child, pick her up from school, etc., but Sandra is a legal stranger to this kid and it's quite unlikely that Janine would permit Sandra to adopt the child. Janine will always be the child's mother, with full parental rights. The only rights Sandra has are the ones that Jesse gives to her and she acts as his proxy. The headline on this story is insulting and misleading.
Reply to this comment

Follow Crimesider

Scroll Left
Scroll Right More »
48 Hours 48 Hours for iPad® A perfect companion to TV's most popular true-crime series.
CBS News on Facebook