Add a Comment
- Roman Polanski - Petition asking for "No Preferential Treatment of Polanski" by Teenage Rape Survivor
http://www.ipetitions.com/petition/nomeansnomeansnomenasno - Reply to this comment
- Makes no difference if she testifies or not.
Makes no difference how "sexually sophisticated" she was.
It is ILLEGAL for a man to have sex with a child. Period.
Polanski not only committed a crime against this child, he committed a crime against the state. He should do 10 years for raping this child, and ten years for evading justice. - Reply to this comment
- Polanski is kith and kin to sexual perversion, morbid mental illness and homicide. His poor pregnant wife was murdered while pregnant and she knew of Polanski's infidelities. Polanski's films like "Repulsion", "Chinatown" and "Knife In The Water" demonstrate a man who is willing to step out of the bounds of decency and it is no wonder that he would sodomize a 13 year old after giving her alcohol and tranquilizer. He has to face his punishment like a man. If Polanski is afraid of prisoners he can be placed in protective custody. After all, he FORCED this 13 year old girl when he was over 40.
- Reply to this comment
- I just wonder who the 'real' criminals are. Are they the ones who don't make movies? Are they the ones who don't star on TV? Are they the ones who can't afford to flee the country when they rape 13 year old girls. A girl 13 can no more give her consent to sex than a child can. Oh, wait a minute, she is a child. Hollywoods reaction to this affair shows just how out of touch with reality those phony people are. Society would be better off without them.
- Reply to this comment
- Roman Polandski drugged and rapped the little girl. Probably not his first. He did the crime, finally admitted it and escaped failing to do the time. Fleeing is a crime in inself. I believe he needs to do the full sentence for the rape plus time for avoiding incarceration. If he dies in prison great. Juctice served!
- Reply to this comment
- There are some weirdos on this site!
Sheeesh...the victim doesn't want any charges...free him already. - Reply to this comment
- As others have said this is no longer a rape case. What the victim wants no longer matters (she reached an out-of-court civil settlement with her attacker). This is a case of flight to avoid prosecution... something any government takes very seriously. If the State Of California didn't try hard to get this sleazeball back alot of accused folks would be zooming out of the state's jurisdiction to avoid prosecution. This is all about the State of California flexing its muscles. And the only thing that will stop that flexing is the Feds-- submitting to the urgings of foreign governments-- yanking the carpet out from under the state.
This is more about politics than it is about justice. - Reply to this comment
- Perhaps we need to bring up Clinton's pardons to see what other old cases we need to "go after" . Lets all move on.
- Reply to this comment
- unbelivable act on 13years old ....The man should spend rest of his life in prison....Look who is defending this paedophile "france"
- Reply to this comment
- Go to the smoking gun and read the grand jury minuets. The French did not they play the crime down. The victin reported that he raped her front and rear and she did tell him not to do this,. they tend to forget he pled from foricable rape down to satituary rape !
- Reply to this comment
