Add a Comment See all 157 Comments
by naj1953 July 7, 2009 4:28 PM EDT
Why is this woman filming herself anyway....sick...
Reply to this comment
by tunaatlast July 7, 2009 4:11 PM EDT
give the teacher a week off, give the students treatment. Get the teacher a contract with playboy, then make her pay for psyc. treatment for students.
Reply to this comment
by tunaatlast July 7, 2009 4:31 PM EDT
about "give the teacher a week off" comment. I was not aware that only six seconds were shown. Heck most of the time i would have tro getting the dvd to work properly for that. leave the teacher alone.
by exaf74 July 7, 2009 3:21 PM EDT
I wanna see!!!
Reply to this comment
by AttentionDeficit July 7, 2009 2:28 PM EDT
I can't judge this woman until I have seen all the evidence. Where can I get a copy?
Reply to this comment
by zonkzilla July 7, 2009 2:21 PM EDT
Just wanted to point out that exposing a child of ten years old (or under 15) to porn is a State crime in every state and a Federal crime and a felony "accident" or not.
Guess some people missed that.
Glad they are keeping the teacher, she must be really smart.
So you really think the teacher did not preview the DVD before sending it out? Are you so stupid you actually think this was an accident?
The teacher is a sick pervert and needs help and definitely should not be around kids because we all know what she is going to do next.
Reply to this comment
by phydeux2 July 13, 2009 4:58 PM EDT
Hey Zonk, there's a little thing called INTENT! Go back to page one of these comments and the statute is listed right there showing that there MUST BE INTENT in order for it to be prosecuted. Otherwise there'd be a whole lot of people in jail for making a stupid mistake like this, or the countless people who returned the "Land Before Time" video with their homemade porn inside by accident.

Or do you not allow anyone to make mistakes.... ever?
by zonkzilla July 7, 2009 2:15 PM EDT
Oh sure, it was an "accident".
Right.
And anyone who criticizes this teacher's porn video will be in the news for the same exact thing in three years? So now if people express digust with perverts they are perverts too?
Uh,yea, right. Well I guess to a pervert that would make sense.
Reply to this comment
by skeetchamp July 7, 2009 1:55 PM EDT
she should be thrown in prison with all the rest of the perverts who prey on children.
Reply to this comment
by phydeux2 July 13, 2009 4:54 PM EDT
Riiiight, because videotaping yourself is exactly the same as preying on children. With logic like that all clowns MUST be pedophiles because they hide their identities behind makeup and play with children.

I sometimes wonder if people actually THINK before they grab their torches and pitchforks.
by pubsnomore July 7, 2009 1:33 PM EDT
This teacher made every young boy that watched this tape's dreams come true.
Reply to this comment
by willow0313 July 7, 2009 12:55 PM EDT
Parents tell CBS 13 Sacramento that the woman is a good teacher that made an honest but embarrassing mistake.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

This is unbelievable~~ The woman did not make an honest mistake...It is not that easy to record something by mistake, label it and put it on a DVD to be distributed to kids....Did that teacher NOT look at the DVD in it's entirety just to assure that it turned out "ok" before she made copies and distributed those copies? If she did not check it over, then she doesn't have the mentality to teach 5th graders......One must ask..."are you smarter than a 5th grader?".....Ummmmm....I don't think so....That sex-crazed bimbo should be prosecuted and registered as a sexual offender.....
Reply to this comment
by meatrex1 July 7, 2009 11:56 AM EDT
The fake plant and 70's lamp shade in the back really set the mood.

Looking foward to seeing this on AFV !!!!!
Reply to this comment
by NCO_E7 July 7, 2009 7:55 AM EDT
OMG! That would make the perfect commercial!
Reply to this comment
by kphx July 7, 2009 1:04 AM EDT
Right on. If it would have been gay / lesbian porn by the teacher, all these suckers would be protesting in front of the school / the teachers house. Sex by itself is nothing wrong. Thats how we all got here. But displaying it in this fashion ... No Sir.
Reply to this comment
by kphx July 7, 2009 12:58 AM EDT
I want to be in her class for next year.

Kidding aside, would I be able to keep my job, if in one of my presentations to my clients distributed via DVD, I add my own porn. I don't think so.
Reply to this comment
by NancyLou9 July 7, 2009 12:19 AM EDT
I was laughing so hard on this one I couldn't breathe. I couldn't stop ;laughing to tell my family about this one! My teenage son had to lean over to read it out loud to my husband.

Should I be looking into suing the Dad in this news report for subjecting my son to this?
Reply to this comment
by NancyLou9 July 7, 2009 12:15 AM EDT
I agree with so many of the posters here and my first thought in all of this was:

Uh, Dad... If you have three kids, how is it you don't know what to tell your kids about sex? My thinking is, if they need any counseling at all it's to overcome the embarrassment of having you for a dad. Puh-leze!

Dad, how about you go through some kind of parental counseling, you know, on how to be a parent and stop trying to set up a lawsuit.
Reply to this comment
by family2010 July 6, 2009 10:04 PM EDT
To staycalm, a minority opinion: Amen.
Reply to this comment
by family2010 July 6, 2009 9:59 PM EDT
So now I'm curious: Would the report be more serious or legitimate if the complaining parent appeared on camera and spoke like a senator? Is the issue here CBS or its local affiliate failed to provide an appropriate sound bite?

Seems to me that the underlying complaint is pretty serious, no matter who the parent is in front of the camera. Bear in mind, the victims in this story are elementary school students. And I respect a parent who tries, albeit imperfectly, to speak for his or her child, vs. someone who doesn't bother to speak out at all.
Reply to this comment
by family2010 July 6, 2009 9:48 PM EDT
Reply to lavaflow: Disagree with the "Duh." Sometimes, depending on the statute, intent can be inferred from the circumstances. The classic example are the drug laws where intent can be "found" based on the quantity of the drug found on the person (i.e., possession with intent to distribute). Whether this applies to this case remains to be seen, but I'm speaking about the general principle.
Reply to this comment
by lavaflow July 6, 2009 8:58 PM EDT
Stickdog3 is my hero!
Reply to this comment
by lavaflow July 6, 2009 8:45 PM EDT
Duhhhh......Intentional? Intent? That word mean anything to you?
Reply to this comment
See all 157 Comments

Crimesider Topics

Crimesider is the ultimate destination for true-crime fans: riveting crimes, exclusive 911 calls, police interrogations, expert forensics, and more. It's in our DNA. Now it's in yours.

BOOK 'EM

Book 'Em: It Happens Every Day

Inside the World of a Sex Crimes D.A.

Photos
Scroll Left Scroll Right